Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 8:1 (2022) ► pp.85–113

Degrees of authenticity

Emulation, hybridity, and place-making in Vietnamese landscapes

ORCID logo | University of Manchester

This paper presents a taxonomy of indexicalities attached to Linguistic Landscapes in the city of Manchester, UK, which utilise Vietnamese writing and imagery. The taxonomy contrasts the employment of Vietnamese as a foreign language by a British restaurant chain, as a heritage language by second-generation Vietnamese businesses, and as a first language by first-generation businesses. Through the incorporation of scale analysis, the paper aims to show that while all three types of landscapes index Vietnamese authenticity on the surface level of indexicality, on a higher level, a distinction can be drawn between place-making, identity work, and purely commercial indexicalities. That distinction is argued not to be identifiable in the visual resources of the landscapes themselves, but rather in the shared knowledge drawn on in their interpretation. The paper hopes to further contribute to the theoretical diversity of Linguistic Landscape by demonstrating the compatibility and benefits of scale analysis.

Keywords: Vietnamese, Manchester, scale analysis, indexicality, authenticity, commodification, identity, place-making, language maintenance, language shift
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Emulated Vietnam
  • 4.British-Vietnamese hybridity
    • 4.1Viet shack
    • 4.2Nam MCR
    • 4.3Self-commodification and hybrid identities
  • 5.Diasporic place-making
    • 5.1The Vietnamese store
    • 5.2The barber shop
    • 5.3Pragmatism and place-making
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 20 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21004.ngu
References
Agnihotri, R. K. and McCormick, K.
(2010) Language in the material world: Multilinguality in signage. International Multilingual Research Journal, 4(1), pp.55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aguilar-San Juan, K.
(2005) Staying Vietnamese: community and place in Orange County and Boston. City & Community, 4(1), pp.37–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Augé, M.
(1995) Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. Brooklyn: Verso.Google Scholar
Barber, T.
(2018) The integration of Vietnamese refugees in London and the UK: Fragmentation, complexity, and “in/visibility” (No. 2018/2). WIDER Working Paper.Google Scholar
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Hasan Amara, M. and Trumper-Hecht, N.
(2006) Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International journal of multilingualism, 3(1), pp.7–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, A. and Hirsch, S.
(2017) “Second generation” refugees and multilingualism: identity, race and language transmission. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40 (14), pp.2444–2462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., Collins, J. and Slembrouck, S.
(2005) Spaces of multilingualism. Language & Communication, 25 (3), pp.197–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Maly, I.
(2015) Ethnographic linguistic landscape analysis and social change: A case study. In Language and Superdiversity (pp. 207–227). Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(2007) Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural pragmatics, 4 (1), pp.1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity (Vol. 181). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Backus, A.
(2013) Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. In Multilingualism and multimodality (pp. 9–32). Brill Sense. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burdick, C.
(2012) Mobility and language in place: A linguistic landscape of language commodification. Dissertations and Theses based on CHESS-Sponsored Field Research. 2 1.
Canagarajah, S., and De Costa, P. I.
(2016) Introduction: Scales analysis, and its uses and prospects in educational linguistics. Linguistics and Education, 34 1, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, J., and Slembrouck, S.
(2007) Reading shop windows in globalized neighborhoods: Multilingual literacy practices and indexicality. Journal of Literacy Research, 39 (3), 335–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Companies House
(2020) Retrieved 19/01/2020 at: [URL]; [URL]; [URL]; [URL]
Coupland, N., and Garrett, P.
(2010) Linguistic landscapes, discursive frames and metacultural performance: The case of Welsh Patagonia. International journal of the sociology of language 2010(205), 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F.
(1988) A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.
(2004) Language Minorities. In A. Davies and C. Elder (Eds), Handbook of Applied Linguistics, (pp. 451–476). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M., and Miskowiec, J.
(1986) Of other spaces. diacritics, 16 (1), 22–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, P.
(2009) Multilingualism of Autochthonous Minorities. In P. Auer and L. Wei (Eds). Handbook of Multilingualism and Multilingual Communication, (pp. 469–491). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gorter, D., and Cenoz, J.
(2015) Translanguaging and linguistic landscapes. Linguistic landscape, 1 (1–2), 54–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorter, D. and Cenoz, J.
(2020) Theoretical development of linguistic landscape studies. Linguistic Landscape, 6 (1), pp.16–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorter, D.
ed. (2006) Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, M.
(2010) The commodification of language. Annual review of Anthropology, 39 1, 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1972) On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.) Sociolinguistics. London: Penguin. 269–293.Google Scholar
Ivkovic, D., & Lotherington, H.
(2009) Multilingualism in cyberspace: Conceptualising the virtual linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6 (1), 17–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Käihkö, I.
(2020) Conflict chatnography: Instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine. Ethnography, 21 (1), 71–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y.
(1997) Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of language and social psychology, 16 (1), 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. W., and Lou, J. J.
(2019) The ordinary semiotic landscape of an unordinary place: spatiotemporal disjunctures in Incheon’s Chinatown. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16 (2), 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeman, J., and Modan, G.
(2009) Commodified language in Chinatown: A contextualized approach to linguistic landscape 1. Journal of sociolinguistics, 13 (3), 332–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeman, J. and Modan, G.
(2010) Selling the city: Language, ethnicity and commodified space. In Shohamy, E. G., Rafael, E. B., and Barni, M. (Eds.) Linguistic landscape in the city (pp.182–198). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H., and Nicholson-Smith, D.
(1991) The production of space (Vol. 1421). Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Lou, J.
(2007) Revitalizing Chinatown into a heterotopia: A geosemiotic analysis of shop signs in Washington, DC’s Chinatown. Space and Culture, 10 (2), 170–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, K.
(2017, January 19). #mysanfrancisco: Social Media and the Conceptual Linguistic Landscape. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, D., and Tufi, S.
(Eds.) (2020) Reterritorializing linguistic landscapes: Questioning boundaries and opening spaces. Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y., Gaiser, L., and Reershemius, G.
(2018) Multilingual repertoire management and illocutionary functions in Yiddish signage in Manchester. Journal of Pragmatics, 135 1, 53–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam MCR website
retrieved 19/01/2020 at: [URL]
Nguyễn, T. S. T.
(2006) “They don’t even know what Vietnam is!”: the production of space through hybrid place-making and performativity in an urban public elementary school (Doctoral dissertation).
Nguyên, T. S. T.
(2010) Vietnamese diasporic placemaking: An ethnographic moment in uneven geographic development. Educational Policy, 24 (1), 159–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pho Café website
2020 Accessed 19/01/2020 at: [URL]
Postill, J.
(2017) Doing remote ethnography. In Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Galloway, A., and Bell, G. (Eds.) The Routledge companion to digital ethnography. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Reershemius, G. K.
(2009) Post-vernacular language use in a Low German linguistic community. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 21 (2), 131–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., and Scollon, S. W.
(2003) Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E., and Gorter, D.
(Eds.) (2008) Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M.
(2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and communication, 23 (3–4), 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sims, M., and Sims, J. M.
(2007) The Vietnamese community in Great Britain: thirty years on. London: Runnymede Trust.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C.
(2008) Other Asias. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B.
(2020) Linguistic landscape: The semiotics of public signage. Linguistic Landscape, 6 (1), 2–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Telegraph
2019 Retrieved 19/01/2020 at: [URL]
Thurlow, C., and Jaworski, A.
(2012) Elite mobilities: The semiotic landscapes of luxury and privilege. Social Semiotics, 22 (4), 487–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Visible-invisible: The social semiotics of labour in luxury tourism. Elite mobilities, 176–193.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S.
(2007) Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 1, 1024–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, I.
(1998) The time of space and the space of time: The future of social science. Political geography, 17 (1), 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viet Shack Facebook page
2020 Retrieved 19/01/2020 at: [URL]