Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 10:1 (2024) ► pp.22–54

Turn-taking in the interactive Linguistic Landscape

ORCID logo | University of Alberta
| University of Waterloo
| University of Alberta

Building on Linguistic Landscape (LL) research that highlights its interactivity, we examine how interaction is a crucial element in the creation of meaning in the LL. Our analysis draws on the concept of turn-taking from conversation analysis, in applying the concept of turn, i.e. individual interactants’ contributions to conversation, and introducing its counterpart in the LL. Pairing this with the principles of geosemiotics and Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis (ELLA), we demonstrate that LLs can consist of interlinked semiotic turns that proceed similarly to turns of a conversation. Combining turn-taking, geosemiotics and ELLA encourages us to go beyond the fixation of ‘top-down’ vs. ‘bottom-up’ and ‘transgressive’ processes. Not only does the LL hold an ever-present possibility of an interactive response but we show that actors attend to the turn-taking mechanism that includes consistent approaches to dealing with discernible interactants, taking turns, and turn-design.

Keywords: linguistic landscape, conversation analysis, turn-taking, semiotic turn, interaction, geosemiotics, ELLA, Germany
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Framework and research questions
    • 2.1Focus of our analysis and data
    • 2.2Analysing the interactive LL: Geosemiotics, ELLA, and conversation analysis
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Partial covering of turns
    • 3.2Writing over a turn
    • 3.3Parallel turns
    • 3.4Partial destruction of turns
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.22029.fed
References
Alsaif Ali, S. R., & Starks, D.
(2021) The sacred and the banal: linguistic landscapes inside the Grand Mosque of Mecca. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18 (1), 153–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P.
(1998) Introduction. Bilingual conversation revisited. In P. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity (pp. 1–24). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Backhaus, P.
(2007) Linguistic landscapes: A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) ‘Meeting of styles’ and the online infrastructure of graffiti. Applied Linguistics Review, 7 (2), 99–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busch, B.
(2013) The career of a diacritical sign: Language in spatial representations and representational spaces. In S. Pietikainen & H. Kelly-Holmes (Eds.), Multilingualism and the Periphery (pp. 199–221). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, J., & Slembrouck, S.
(2007) Reading shop windows in globalized neighborhoods: Multilingual literacy practices and indexicality. Journal of Literacy Research, 39 (3), 335–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, P.
(2013) Turn design. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 131–149). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Drew, P., & Heritage, J.
(Eds.) (2006) Conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, O.
(2013) ‘The sun is not a star’: Conversations, semiotics, and space in bathroom graffiti Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (1537763)
Gaiser, L.
(2021) Negotiating family language policy: The interplay of Arabic and English in Manchester. Elia, 2 (21), 53–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garvin, R. T.
(2010) Responses to the linguistic landscape in Memphis, Tennessee: An urban space in transition. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscape in the city (pp. 252–271). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T.
(1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A.
(2009) Language conflict in post-Soviet linguistic landscapes. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 17 (1/2), 247–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A.
(2010) Language as a local practice. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schlegoff, E., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Language, 50 1, 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
(2003) Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebba, M.
(2012) Multilingualism in written discourse: An approach to the analysis of multilingual texts. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17 (1), 97–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M.
(2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23 1, 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B. & Cooper, R. L.
(1991) The languages of Jerusalem. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Mensel, L., Vandenbroucke, M., & Blackwood, R.
(2016) Linguistic landscapes. In O. Garcia, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 423–449). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar