The notion of phonetic segment, phone and phoneme are closely related and all are intuitively appealing. At least one of them seems like the right description for speech. But all those who report these intuitions happen to be people who learned to write using a phonetic alphabet in early childhood. Speech is difficult to attend to because of its rapidity, its variability, and the invisibility of the most important body movements, so some cognitive scaffolding for attending to speech accurately is required. The technology of alphabetic writing was modified for this purpose about a hundred years ago. Our alphabet experience accounts for the persuasiveness of our intuitions but segments (phonemic or phonetic) are probably not important units in the psychological representation of language.
2013. Revisiting the phonological deficit in dyslexia: Are implicit nonorthographic representations impaired?. Applied Psycholinguistics 34:4 ► pp. 649 ff.
Chuang, Hui-Kai, R. Malatesha Joshi & L. Quentin Dixon
2012. Cross-Language Transfer of Reading Ability. Journal of Literacy Research 44:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Kluender, K.R. & J.M. Alexander
2008. Perception of Speech Sounds. In The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference, ► pp. 829 ff.
Kluender, Keith R. & Michael Kiefte
2006. Speech Perception within a Biologically Realistic Information-Theoretic Framework. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ► pp. 153 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In Foundations of Voice Studies, ► pp. 398 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.