Article published in:Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment
Edited by Gisela Granena and Mike Long
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 35] 2013
► pp. 3–42
Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA
Claims for a biologically based schedule for language learning were first advanced 50 years ago. 100+ studies later, debates continue as to the existence, scope and timing of one or more sensitive periods for SLA. At least eight reasons can be identified for the lack of consensus, several of which appear to be without basis. They are discussed, along with ten more positive developments over the past decade, including research into the possibility that the very few learners who achieve near-native L2 abilities do so because of superior language learning aptitude(s).
Published online: 22 May 2013
Cited by 27 other publications
No author info given
Austin, Lynette, Arturo E. Hernandez & John W. Schwieter
Biedroń, Adriana & Mirosław Pawlak
Bosch, Sina, João Veríssimo & Harald Clahsen
Bylund, Emanuel, Kenneth Hyltenstam & Niclas Abrahamsson
DeLuca, Vincent, David Miller, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
Gisela Granena, Long, Michael H. & Yucel Yilmaz
Hulstijn, Jan H.
Kachinske, Ilina, Peter Osthus, Katya Solovyeva & Mike Long
Long, Michael H.
Long, Michael H.
LONG, MICHAEL H. & GISELA GRANENA
Long, Michael H., Gisela Granena & Fátima Montero
Long, Michael M.
Paul, Jing Z. & Theres Grüter
Roberts, Leah, Jorge González Alonso, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
Singleton, David & Simone E. Pfenninger
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.