Chapter published in:
Interlanguage: Forty years later
Edited by ZhaoHong Han and Elaine Tarone
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 39] 2014
► pp. 27–46

Chapter 2. Rediscovering prediction

| Ohio State University
This chapter focuses on predictions involving language transfer, which are among the predictions that Selinker (1972) regarded as feasible. Recent studies (e.g., Jarvis 2002) show results that make plausible some predictions for novel SLA contexts (e.g., “Speakers of Finnish as a group will have a greater difficulty with the articles of Portuguese than will speakers of Swedish as a group”). Although predictions involving structures such as articles seem viable (along with some inferences about their significance for what Selinker called the Latent Psychological Structure), there are limits on predictability. Group tendencies often seem predictable but individual behavior much less so, particularly in light of three phenomena considered in the chapter: multilingualism, idiosyncrasy in IL forms, and idiosyncrasy in IL meanings.
Published online: 30 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.04ch2
References
Alhawary, M.
(2009) Speech processing prerequisite or language transfer? Evidence from English and French L2 learners of Arabic. Foreign Language Annals , 42, 367–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
(1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning , 33, 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, F.
(1938) Language. In F. Boas. (Ed.), General Anthropology (pp.124–145). Boston, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N., & Alario, F.
(2001) A crosslinguistic investigation of determiner production. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, Brain, and Cognitive Development (pp.209–226). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chesterman, A.
(1991)  On Definiteness: A Study with Special Reference to English and Finnish . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G.
(1999) Agreement. In J. Miller (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories (pp.12–18). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Craig, C.
(1977)  Jacaltec: The Structure of Jacaltec . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1985)  Understanding Second Language Acquisition . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. & Barlow, M.
(1988) Introduction. In M. Barlow & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Agreement in Natural Language (pp.1–22). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1984)  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Volume I . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z-H
(2010) Grammatical inadequacy as a function of linguistic relativity: A longitudinal case study. In Z.-H. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in Second Language Acquisition: Evidence of First Language Thinking for Speaking (pp.154–182). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Helms-Park, R.
(2003) Transfer in SLA and creoles: The implications of causative serial verbs in the interlanguage of Vietnamese ESL learners Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 25, 211–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S.
(1998)  Conceptual Transfer in the Interlanguage Lexicon . Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications.Google Scholar
(2002) Topic continuity in L2 English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 24, 387–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A.
(2008)  Ccross-linguistic Influence in Language and Cognition . Ney York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Crossley, S.
(Eds.) (2012)  Approaching language Transfer through Text Classification . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., Castañeda-Jiménez, G., & Nielsen, R.
(2012) Detecting L2 writers’ L1s on the basis of their lexical styles. In S. Jarvis & S. Crossley (Eds.), Approaching Language Transfer through Text Classification (pp.34–70). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1922)  Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin . London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kamimoto, T., Shimura, A., & Kellerman, E.
(1992) A second language classic reconsidered—the case of Schachter’s avoidance. Second Language Research , 8, 251–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lado, R.
(1957)  Linguistics across Cultures . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008)  Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S. Thompson (Eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse (pp.181–225). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. & Thompson, S.
(1987) Chinese. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The World’s Major Languages (pp. 811–833). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lucy, J.
(1992)  Grammatical Categories and Cognition . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luk, Z., & Shirai, Y.
(2009) Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural -s, articles, and possessive's . Language Learning , 59, 721–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Migge, B.
(2003)  Creole Formation as Language Contact . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T.
(1989)  Language transfer: Cross-linguistic Influence in Language Learning . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Cross-linguistic influence. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 436–486). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Could a contrastive analysis ever be complete? In J. Arabski (Ed.), Cross-linguistic Influences in the Second Language Lexicon (pp. 22–35). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2008) Conceptual transfer and meaning extensions. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 306–340). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012a) The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 129–131). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012b) Nothing will come of nothing. In B. Kortmann & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Linguistic Complexity in Interlanguage Varieties, L2 Varieties, and Contact Languages (pp.62–89). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
(20012c) Reconciling group tendencies and individual variation in the acquisition of L2 and L3. In D. Gabrys´-Barker (Ed.), Cross-linguistic Influences in Multilingual Language Acquisition, Second Language Learning and Teaching . (pp. 81–97). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
(2013) Accelerator or inhibitor? On the role of substrate influence in interlanguage development. In D. Schreier & M. Hundt (Eds.), English as a Contact Language (pp. 298–313). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Orr, G.
(1987)  Aspects of the Second Language Acquisition of Chichewa Noun Class Morphology . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Ringbom, H.
(1987)  The Role of the First Language in Foreign Language Learning . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2007)  Cross-linguistic Similarity in Foreign Language Learning . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., Stowe, L.
, & de Haan, G. (2006) Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research , 22, 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J.
(1974) An error in error analysis. Language Learning , 24, 205–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
(1969) Language transfer. General Linguistics , 9, 67–92.Google Scholar
(1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics , 10, 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992)  Rediscovering Interlanguage . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.
(1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 97–114). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E.
(1993) Articles in translation: An exercise in cognitive linguistics. In R. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (pp. 785–800). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, R.
(1970) The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly , 4, 123–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, R., & Jackson, K.
(1972) The unpredictability of contrastive analysis” Language Learning , 22, 29–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Annick De Houwer & Lourdes Ortega
2018.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism, Crossref logo
Han, ZhaoHong
2016. Research meets practice. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 51:3 ► pp. 236 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.