Adams, R., Nuevo, A., & Egi, T. (2011). Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner-learner interactions?Modern Language Journal, 95, 42–63.
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–265). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Alcón, E. (2002). Relationship between teacher-led versus learners’ interaction and the development of pragmatics in the EFL classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 359–377.
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483.
Anderson, J. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Angelova, M., Gunawardena, D., & Volk, D. (2006). Peer teaching and learning: Co-constructing language in a dual language first grade. Language and Education, 20(3), 173–190.
Ballinger, S., & Lyster, R. (2011). Student and teacher oral language use in a two-way Spanish/English immersion school. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 289–306.
Batstone, R. (2010). Issues and options in sociocognition. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 3–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bergman, M. (2011). The good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research and design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 271–275.
Brooks, F., & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania, 77(2), 262–274.
Brown, A. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60.
Bruton, A., & Samuda, V. (1980). Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work. RELC Journal, 11(2), 49–63.
Buckwalter, P. (2001). Repair sequences in Spanish L2 dyadic discourse: A descriptive study. The Modern Language Journal, 85(3), 380–397.
de Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46(3), 529–555.
DeKeyser, R. (2010). Practice for second language learning: Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 155–165.
DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 20–60). London: Longman.
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative dialogue in learner–learner and learner–native speaker interaction. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 229–256.
Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 1–23.
Foster, P., & Ohta, A. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402–430.
Fotos, S. (1998). Shifting the focus from forms to form in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 52(4), 301–307.
Fujii, A., & Mackey, A. (2009). Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3), 267–301.
Galaczi, E. (2008). Peer-peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English Examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), 89–119.
García Mayo, M.P., & Alcón Soler, E. (2013). Negotiated input and output / interaction. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 209–299). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
García Mayo, M.P., & Pica, T. (2000). L2 learner interaction in a foreign language setting: Are learning needs addressed?International Review of Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 35–58.
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55(4), 575–611.
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1989). Incorporated repairs in nonnative discourse. In M. Eisenstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation (pp. 71–86). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Gupta, D. (2004). CLT in India: Context and methodology come together. ELT Journal, 58(3), 266–269.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Baralt, M. (2014). Exploring learner perception and use of task-based interactional feedback in FTF and CMC modes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 1–37.
Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401–435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Hulstijn, J., Young, R., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N., Lantolf, J., Mackey, A., & Talmy, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 1–61.
Iwashita, N. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on interactional moves and modified output in nonnative-nonnative interaction in Japanese as a foreign language. System, 29(2), 267–287.
Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 168–196.
Jean, G., & Simard, D. (2011). Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring?Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 467–494.
Khazaei, Z., Zadeh, A., & Ketabi, S. (2012). Willingness to communicate in Iranian EFL learners: The effect of class sizeEnglish Language Teaching, 5(11), 181–187.
Kim, Y. (2013). Effects of pretask modeling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 8–35.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199.
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kormos, J., & Kiddle, T. (2013). The role of socio-economic factors in motivation to learn English as a foreign language: The case of Chile. System, 41(2), 399–412.
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A. (2012). The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62(2), 439–472.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 364–377). New York: Routledge.
Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 102–120.
Lam, R. (2015). Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 32, 169–197.
Lantolf, J. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J.M. (2005). Error correction: Students’ versus teachers’ perceptions. Language Awareness, 14(2-3), 112–127.
Levelt, W. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556.
Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–278.
Long, M. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments in non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–193.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp. 123–167). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Lyster, R. (1987). Speaking immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 43(4), 701–717.
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). State-of-the-art article: Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.
Mackey, A. (2007). Introduction: The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. (2012). Interactionist approach. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 7–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53(1), 35–66.
McCollum, P. (1999). Learning to value English: Cultural capital in a dual language bilingual program. Bilingual Research Journal, 23(1), 133–134.
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224.
McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 79–103.
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2010). Collaborative syntactic priming activities and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), 817–841.
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2000). Communicative tasks, conversational interaction, and linguistic form: An empirical study of Thai. Foreign Language Annals, 33(1), 82–91.
Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskyan perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help in the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34–51.
Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 169–184.
Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 384–402.
Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 97–111.
Ortega, L. (2009). Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honour of Susan Gass (pp. 226–253). New York, NY: Routledge.
Palinscar, A. (1998). Social constructionist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375.
Pasfield-Neofitou, S. (2012). Online communication in a second language: Social interaction, language use, and learning Japanese. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Philp, J., & Tognini, R. (2009). Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3-4), 245–266.
Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form?Language Awareness, 19(4), 261–279.
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners?TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 59–84.
Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45–141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Center, Adult Migrant Education Program.
Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200–222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Potowski, K. (2007). Language and identity in a dual immersion school. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Pritchard, R., & Maki, H. (2006). The changing self-perceptions of Japanese university students of English. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(2), 141–156.
Russell, V. (2014). A closer look at the Output Hypothesis: The effect of pushed output on noticing and inductive learning of the Spanish future tense. Foreign Language Annals, 47(1), 25–47.
Sato, M. (2007). Social relationships in conversational interaction: A comparison between learner-learner and learner-NS dyads. JALT Journal, 29(2), 183–208.
Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611–633.
Sato, M. (2015a). Density and complexity of oral production in interaction: The interactionist approach and an alternative. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 53(3) 307–329.
Sato, M. (2015b). The noticeability and effectiveness of corrective feedback in video-based interaction. Selected plenary presented at XVII International CALL Research Conference, Tarragona, Spain.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-method examination. Language Awareness, 21(1-2), 157–179.
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2007). Modified output of Japanese EFL learners: Variable effects of interlocutor vs. feedback types. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 123–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–262.
Sauro, S. (2011). SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 1–23.
Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010). Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 554–577.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult leaner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Shehadeh, A. (1999). Non-native speakers’ production of modified comprehensible output and second language learning. Language Learning, 49(4), 627–675.
Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self- and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 433–457.
Shonerd, H. (1994). Repair in spontaneous speech: A window on second language development. In V. John-Steiner, C. Panofsky, & L. Smith (Eds.), Sociocultural approaches to language and literacy: An interactionist perspective (pp. 82–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, B. (2009). The relationship between scrolling, negotiation, and self-initiated self-repair in an SCMC environment. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 231–245.
Steel, C., & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2011. ReCALL, 25(3), 306–320.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158.
Storch, N. (2009). The nature of pair interaction: Learners? interaction in an ESL class: Its nature and impact on grammatical development. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Students’ engagement with feedback on writing: The role of learner agency/beliefs. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 166–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Harlow, UK: Longman.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 285–304.
Tarone, E., & Swain, M. (1995). A sociolinguistic perspective on second language use in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 166–178.
Toth, P. (2008). Teacher- and learner-led discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for L2 morphosyntactic development. Language Learning, 58(2), 237–283.
Toth, P., Wagner, E., & Moranski, K. (2013). ‘Co-constructing’ explicit L2 knowledge with high school Spanish learners through guided induction. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255–278.
Ullman, M. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 71–90.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180.
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142.
Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583–625.
Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29(3), 325–340.
Yanguas, Í. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time. Language Learning and Technology, 14(1), 72–93.
Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Task effects on focus on form in synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 115–132.
Yoshida, R. (2008). Learners’ perception of corrective feedback in pair work. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 525–541.
Cited by (32)
Cited by 32 other publications
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
2024. Peer interaction and attention to form in web-based synchronous and asynchronous L2 collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 37:7 ► pp. 1602 ff.
Ky Nhan, Lam
2024. Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Peer Interaction in Developing English Speaking Skills. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)► pp. 2333 ff.
2024. The Impact of Different Kinds of Collaborative Prewriting on EFL Learners’ Degree of Engagement in Writing and Writing Self-Efficacy. Reading & Writing Quarterly 40:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Spinelli, Franciele
2024. Examining learning opportunities and perceptions of Latin American ESL learners in varying proficiency‐level groups. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:3 ► pp. 884 ff.
Ting, Kuang-yun
2024. Students’ perspective toward anonymous peer feedback in online writing classes. Interactive Learning Environments 32:8 ► pp. 4458 ff.
Ebadijalal, Marjan & Shahab Moradkhani
2023. Impacts of computer-assisted collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual writing on EFL learners’ performance and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning► pp. 1 ff.
Gorham, Tom, Rwitajit Majumdar & Hiroaki Ogata
2023. Analyzing learner profiles in a microlearning app for training language learning peer feedback skills. Journal of Computers in Education 10:3 ► pp. 549 ff.
Labrović, Jelena Anđelković, Nikola Petrović, Jelena Anđelković & Marija Meršnik
2023. Patterns of behavioral engagement in an online english language course: cluster analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education
2023. EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research 27:3 ► pp. 689 ff.
Tosun, Sibel & Nuray Alagözlü
2023. THE EFFECT OF INTERACTIONAL STRATEGY TRAINING ON PEER COLLABORATION AND INTERACTION PATTERNS. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 33:2 ► pp. 701 ff.
Sato, Masatoshi
2022. Mindsets and language-related problem-solving behaviors during interaction in the classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 16:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
Sato, Masatoshi & Neomy Storch
2022. Context matters: Learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context. Language Teaching Research 26:5 ► pp. 919 ff.
Dao, Phung, Mai Xuan Nhat Chi Nguyen & Do-Na Chi
2021. Reflective learning practice for promoting adolescent EFL learners’ attention to form. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 15:3 ► pp. 247 ff.
Clifford, Elisabeth, Christine Pleines, Hilary Thomas & Susanne Winchester
2019. Learners as teachers? An evaluation of peer interaction and correction in
a German Language MOOC. In CALL and complexity – short papers from EUROCALL 2019, ► pp. 88 ff.
McDonough, Kim, Jindarat De Vleeschauwer & William J. Crawford
2019. Exploring the benefits of collaborative prewriting in a Thai EFL context. Language Teaching Research 23:6 ► pp. 685 ff.
Xu, Jinfen, Yumei Fan & Qingting Xu
2019. EFL learners’ corrective feedback decision-making in task-based peer interaction. Language Awareness 28:4 ► pp. 329 ff.
Baralt, Melissa, Laura Gurzynski-Weiss & YouJin Kim
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.