Article published in:
Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda
Edited by Masatoshi Sato and Susan Ballinger
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 45] 2016
► pp. 3361
References
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M.P
(2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M.P. Garca Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Allwright, R
(1980) Turns, topics and tasks: Patterns of participation in language teaching and learning. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 165–187). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F
(1998) Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H., & Iwashita, N
(2016) Interactional behaviours of low-proficiency learners in small group work. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 113–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Donato, R
(1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A
(1994) Classroom interaction, comprehension, and L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 44, 449–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A
(2012) Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014a) Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair and small group interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 14, 158–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A
(2013) Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41, 365–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Ohta, A
(2005) Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M.P
(2002) The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 156–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, M.C.M. de
(2005) Inner speech - L2: Thinking words in a second language. New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y
(2008) The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K
(2008) The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M
(2002) Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 485–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasito, & Storch, N
(2013) Comparing pair and small group interactions on oral tasks. RELC Journal, 44, 361–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M.J
(2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A.S
(2000) Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Philp, J., & Iwashita, N
(2013) Talking, tuning in and noticing: Exploring the benefits of output in task-based peer interaction. Language Awareness, 22, 353–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N
(2016) A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S
(2012) Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21, 157–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M
(1988) Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent’ period. Child Language, 15, 567–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shekary, M., & Tahririan, M
(2006) Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 557–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slimani, A
(1989) The role of topicalisation in classroom language learning. System, 17, 223–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N
(2001a) Comparing ESL learners’ attention to grammar on three different classroom tasks. RELC Journal, 32, 104–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 457–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A
(2013) Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17, 31–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G
(2010) Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L
(2011) Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M
(2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N
(2012) Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In R. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69–100). Boston, MA: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Williams, J
(1999) Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y
(2011) Task effects on focus on form in synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 115–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, A., & Tedick, D.J
(2016) Collaborative dialogue in a two-way Spanish/English immersion classroom: Does heterogeneous grouping promote peer linguistic scaffolding? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 135–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, S
(2009) Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37, 434–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Bernstein, Katie A.
2018. The Perks of Being Peripheral: English Learning and Participation in a Preschool Classroom Network of Practice. TESOL Quarterly 52:4  pp. 798 ff. Crossref logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2020.  In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55],  pp. 20 ff. Crossref logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Effects of proficiency and collaborative work on child EFL individual dictogloss writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2  pp. 246 ff. Crossref logo
Castañeda, Daniel A.
2021. Improving conversational interactions with task-based activities in a Spanish as a second language class. Computer Assisted Language Learning 34:8  pp. 1154 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Wenxue
2016. The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal  pp. ccw075 ff. Crossref logo
Feng, Ruiling, Kyunghee Pyun, Wenzhong Zhang & Rafael Márquez Flores
2021. When Different Language Groups Meet Online: Covert and Overt Focus on Form in Text-Based Chats. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Fernández-Dobao, Ana
2020.  In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55],  pp. 92 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Youn-hee
2020. Willingness to engage: the importance of what learners bring to pair work. Language Awareness 29:2  pp. 134 ff. Crossref logo
Loewen, Shawn & Masatoshi Sato
2018. Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching 51:3  pp. 285 ff. Crossref logo
Peace, Meghann M.
2021. Noticing without negotiation?: What L2 Spanish learners report hearing in peer-produced language . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4  pp. 491 ff. Crossref logo
Peeters, Ward
2018. Applying the networking power of Web 2.0 to the foreign language classroom: a taxonomy of the online peer interaction process. Computer Assisted Language Learning 31:8  pp. 905 ff. Crossref logo
Peeters, Ward
2019. The peer interaction process on Facebook: a social network analysis of learners’ online conversations. Education and Information Technologies 24:5  pp. 3177 ff. Crossref logo
Philp, Jenefer
2016.  In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45],  pp. 377 ff. Crossref logo
Philp, Jenefer & Susan Duchesne
2016. Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36  pp. 50 ff. Crossref logo
Sato, Masatoshi
2017. Interaction Mindsets, Interactional Behaviors, and L2 Development: An Affective-Social-Cognitive Model. Language Learning 67:2  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Claudia Dussuel Lam
2021. Metacognitive instruction with young learners: A case of willingness to communicate, L2 use, and metacognition of oral communication. Language Teaching Research 25:6  pp. 899 ff. Crossref logo
Storch, Neomy & Ali Alshuraidah
2020.  In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55],  pp. 112 ff. Crossref logo
Swain, Merrill & Yuko Watanabe
2019.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sydorenko, Tetyana, John Hellermann, Steven L. Thorne & Vanessa Howe
2019. Mobile Augmented Reality and Language‐Related Episodes. TESOL Quarterly 53:3  pp. 712 ff. Crossref logo
Tajabadi, Azar, Moussa Ahmadian, Hamidreza Dowlatabadi & Hooshang Yazdani
2020. EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882095120 ff. Crossref logo
Tavakol, Mahbube, Mansoor Tavakoli & Saeed Ketabi
2022. The impact of linguistic background on the nature of classroom dyadic interactions: evidence from L2 and L3 learners of English as a foreign language. International Multilingual Research Journal 16:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Young, Amy I. & Diane J. Tedick
2016.  In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45],  pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 december 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.