Part of
Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical potential and research agendaEdited by Masatoshi Sato and Susan Ballinger
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 45] 2016
► pp. 185–208
Edited by Masatoshi Sato and Susan Ballinger
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 45] 2016
► pp. 185–208
7. Thai EFL learners’ interaction during collaborative writing tasks and its relationship to text quality
Second language (L2) writing research has shown that L2 learners routinely scaffold each other when working together to co-construct written texts. The analysis of peer interaction has focused largely on the occurrence of language-related episodes (LREs), with fewer studies documenting how learners discuss other elements of written texts, such as their content or organization (Elola & Oskoz 2010; Storch 2005; Storch & Wigglesworth 2007; Wigglesworth & Storch 2009), or establishing a link between student interaction and text quality. This chapter describes the interaction that occurred when Thai EFL students worked in pairs to write summary and problem/solution paragraphs and explores whether their discussions were related to text quality in the form of analytic ratings. The results indicated that problem/solution collaborative writing tasks showed a positive relationship between student talk and text quality and elicited significantly more discussion of content, organization, and language than summary tasks. Implications are discussed in terms of pedagogical considerations for the use of collaborative writing tasks in EFL contexts.
References (61)
Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 29–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M.P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.91–116). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Basterrechea, M. & García Mayo, M.P. (2013). Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 25–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Bosher, S. (1998). The composing processes of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 205–241.
Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58–89). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning 39, 81–141.
. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), 51–71.
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.
Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41, 365–378.
Fortune, A. (2005). Learners’ use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks. Language Awareness, 14, 21–38.
Fujii, A., Zeigler, N., & Mackey, A. (2016). Learner-learner interaction and metacognitive instruction in the EFL classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 63–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hu, G., & Lam, S. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38, 371–394.
Hyland, K. (2011). Learning to write: Issues in theory, research, and pedagogy. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234.
. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). Collaborative writing in L2: The effect of group interaction on text quality. In S. Randsdell & M.-L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 169–188). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lantolf, J. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). London: Routledge.
Leeser, M.J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81.
Liu, J., & Sadler, R. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193–227.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lundstrum, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43.
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malmquist, A. (2005). How does group discussion in reconstruction tasks affect written language output? Language Awareness, 14, 128–141.
Manchón, R. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McDonough, K., Crawford, W., De Vleeschauwer, J. (2013).
Collaborative and individual writing in a Thai university context
. Paper presented at the 24th European Second Language Association conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
. (2014). Summary writing in a Thai EFL university context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24, 20–32.
Min, H. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118–141.
Neumann, H., & McDonough, K. (2014). Exploring the relationships among student preferences, prewriting tasks, and text quality in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 14–26.
. (2015). Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 84–104.
Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18, 384–402.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers. Language Learning 37, 439–469.
Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 9, 259–291.
Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 611–633.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591–626.
Sato, M. Viveros, P. (2016). Interaction of collaboration? Group dynamics in the foreign language classroom. In M. Sato & Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 91–112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Scott, V.M, & de la Fuente, M.J. (2008). What’s the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during consciousness-raising form-focused tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 100–113.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 286–305.
Shi, L. (1998). Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students’ compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 319–345.
Storch, N. (2002a). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158.
. (2002b). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 305–322.
. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173.
. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2010). Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14, 355–375.
. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17, 31–48.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effects of collaboration. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.157–177). Clevedon, UK; Multilingual Matters.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2006). Languaging, agency, and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.
Swain, (2010). Talking-it-through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337.
. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research 4, 251–274.
. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 99–118). Harlow, UK: Longman.
Sweigart, W. (1991). Classroom talk, knowledge development, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 469–496.
Van Weijen, D., van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsam, G., & Sanders, T. (2009). L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 235–250.
Wagner, E., & Toth, P. (2013). Building explicit L2 Spanish knowledge through guided induction in small group and whole class interaction. In K. McDonough, & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 89–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26, 445–466.
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Abad, José Vicente & María Fernanda Arango Salazar
2024. Escritura colaborativa en educación superior y su aporte a la formación de maestros investigadores. Forma y Función 37:1 
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
2023. The effect of collaborative prewriting on L2 collaborative writing production and individual L2 writing development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Li, Mimi & Meixiu Zhang
2023. Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching 56:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
Payant, Caroline & Derek Reagan
2023. Engaging lower proficiency learners of Spanish in collaborative writing tasks. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 36:2 ► pp. 643 ff.
Sang, Zilin & Weicheng Zou
2023. The Effect of Joint Production on the Accuracy and Complexity of Second Language Writing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:2 ► pp. 425 ff.
Tajabadi, Azar, Moussa Ahmadian, Hamidreza Dowlatabadi & Hooshang Yazdani
2023. EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research 27:3 ► pp. 689 ff.
Tri, Pham Manh, Nguyen Thi Thanh Van & Cao Thi Xuan Tu
2023. EFL Students’ Perceptions and Challenges of Computer-Mediated Collaborative Writing in Academic Writing Courses at Van Lang University. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL 2022) [Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 744], ► pp. 34 ff.
Van, Cong Hoang Truong & Thi Thanh Mai Tran
2023. VLU EFL Students’ Perceptions Toward the Use of Collaborative Writing. International Journal of TESOL & Education 3:3 ► pp. 57 ff.
Zhang, Meixiu & Mimi Li
2023. Collaborative writing in face-to-face and computer-mediated L2 settings. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 53 ff.
Horii, Sachiko Yokoi
2022. Material Mediation in L2 Writing Activities in a College Russian as a Foreign Language Classroom in Japan. In New Perspectives on Material Mediation in Language Learner Pedagogy [Educational Linguistics, 56], ► pp. 171 ff.
Toth, Paul D. & Yohana Gil‐Berrio
2022. Exploring “Intersubjectivity Negotiation Episodes” and “Language Related Episodes” in Second‐Language Peer Interaction. Language Learning 72:S1 ► pp. 275 ff.
Zhang, Meixiu & William J. Crawford
2022. Attention to form in collaborative writing: language-related episodes in L1 and L2 use conditions. Language Awareness 31:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Li, Hui Helen, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Haoran Xie
2021. Effects of structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions on Chinese university EFL students’ individual writing: A quasi-experimental study. PLOS ONE 16:5 ► pp. e0251569 ff.
Salem Aldossary, Khaled
2021. The Impact of Collaborative Writing on EFL Learners’ Writing Development: A Longitudinal Classroom-Based Study in Saudi Arabia. SSRN Electronic Journal
Zhang, Meixiu
2021. Understanding L1 and L2 interaction in collaborative writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis. Language Teaching Research 25:3 ► pp. 338 ff.
Zhang, Meixiu
2022. A re-examination of pair dynamics and L2 learning opportunities in collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research 26:1 ► pp. 10 ff.
Zhang, Meixiu
2024. Collaborative writing in an EFL secondary setting: the role of task complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 325 ff.
Li, Hui Helen, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Judy M. Parr
2020. Small-Group Student Talk Before Individual Writing in Tertiary English Writing Classrooms in China: Nature and Insights. Frontiers in Psychology 11
McDonough, Kim & William J. Crawford
2020. Identifying effective writing tasks for use in EFL write-to-learn language contexts. The Language Learning Journal 48:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
Mohammadzadeh, Aysheh, Touran Ahour, Mahnaz Saeidi & María Consuelo Sáiz Manzanares
2020. A Sociocultural Perspective on Second Language Writing: The Effect of Symmetrical versus Asymmetrical Scaffolding on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity and Their Attitudes. Education Research International 2020 ► pp. 1 ff.
Sippel, Lieselotte
2020. German Learners' Beliefs About Peer Interaction and Peer Feedback. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 53:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
McDonough, Kim, Jindarat De Vleeschauwer & William J. Crawford
2019. Exploring the benefits of collaborative prewriting in a Thai EFL context. Language Teaching Research 23:6 ► pp. 685 ff.
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2019. Methodological strengths, challenges, and joys of classroom-based quasi-experimental research. In Doing SLA Research with Implications for the Classroom [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 52], ► pp. 31 ff.
Philp, Jenefer
2016. New pathways in researching interaction. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 377 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.