Cover not available
Part of
Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda
Edited by Masatoshi Sato and Susan Ballinger
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 45] 2016
► pp. 241–266

9. EFL task-based interaction

Does task modality impact on language-related episodes?

| University of the Basque Country
| University of the Basque Country
Research on L2 interaction has shown that task modality (written vs. oral) influences language learning opportunities. However, most research has been carried out in ESL settings and few studies have investigated task modality differences in EFL contexts, where both quantity and quality of exposure to the target language differ considerably. In addition, most research has only focused on how task modality impacts on the incidence, nature and outcome of language-related episodes (LREs), but has not considered the relationship between task modality and learners’ level of engagement. This chapter examines the impact of task modality on the LREs and level of engagement in the oral interaction of 44 Spanish-Basque EFL learners while completing four communicative tasks. The findings point to a significant impact of task modality on the incidence, nature and outcome of LREs but a minor impact on learners’ level of engagement.
Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.10gar
References (62)
Adams, R. (2006). L2 tasks and orientation to form: A role for modality? ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 7–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–265). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M.P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M.P. (2012). Does gender influence task performance in EFL? Interactive tasks and language related episodes. In E. Alcón Soler & M.P. Safont Jordá (Eds.), Discourse and learning across L2 instructional contexts (pp. 249–278). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M.P. (2013). Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 25–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, A. (1993). Dictogloss – When the words get in the way. TESOL in Context, 3(2), 21–23.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M.P. (2001). Focus on form tasks in EFL grammar pedagogy. In D. Lasagabaster & J.M. Sierra (Eds.), Language awareness in the foreign language classroom (pp. 221–236). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country Press Service.Google Scholar
. (2002a). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 156–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002b). Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: A comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 323–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M.P, & Alcón Soler, E. (2013). Negotiated input and output interaction. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 209–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M.P, & García Lecumberri, M.L.(Eds.). (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M.P., & Pica, T. 2000. L2 interaction in a foreign language setting: Are learning needs addressed. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 35–58.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (175–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Keck, C.M, Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A quantitative meta-analysis. In J.M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 364–377). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leeser, M.J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lukin, A. (1994). Functional grammar and dictogloss: What does ‘Good Grammar’ really mean? TESOL in Context, 4(2), 49–51.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–472). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Sunitham, W. (2009). Collaborative dialogue between Thai EFL learners during self-access computer activities. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 2321–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2000). Towards integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classroom: some pedagogical possibilities. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 241–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 384–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, G., & Dunn, W. (2010). Taking teacher education to task: Exploring the role of teacher education in promoting the utilization of task-based language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(2), 161–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxenden, C., Latham-Koenig, C., & Seligson, P. (1997a). New English file. Elementary student’s book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1997b). New English file. Pre intermediate student’s book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1997c). New English file. Upper intermediate. student’s book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Philp, J., & Tognini, R. (2009). Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 245–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp. 9–34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pica, T., Kang, H., & Sauro, S. (2006). Information gap tasks. Their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 301–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 52–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2007). Modified output of Japanese EFL learners: Variable effects of interlocutor vs. feedback types. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 123–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language. A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R.R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2009). Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 77–101). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interaction between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (1998a). Comparing second language learners’ attention to form across tasks. Language Awareness, 7, 176–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998b). A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative, text reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 52(4), 291–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17(2), 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair-work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2005). The Output Hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research 4(3), 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 99–118). London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Syndicate, U.C.L.E. (2001). Quick placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A sociocultural approach. In R. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69–100). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 10–25). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Cited by (49)

Cited by 49 other publications

Aksoy-Pekacar, Kadriye
2024. Task-related collaborative behaviours in task-based oral peer interactions. The Language Learning Journal 52:4 ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane & Asier Calzada
2024. A multi-faceted view of engagement with language: a study with young EFL learners working on a collaborative writing task. Classroom Discourse ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gallardo del Puerto, Francisco & María Basterrechea
2024. The role of proficiency and pair formation method in language-related episodes: A study of young CLIL learners’ interaction. Language Teaching Research 28:3 ► pp. 1087 ff. DOI logo
Villarreal, Izaskun & Amaia Martínez-Sánchez
2024. Exploring immediate and prolonged effects of collaborative writing on young learners’ texts: L2 versus FL. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 1039 ff. DOI logo
Ren, Wei, Yuchen Peng & Yiman Wu
2023. The influence of task complexity and task modality on learners’ topic and turn management. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
Sletova, Natalia
2023. L2 writing as a scaffold for L2 speaking accuracy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
TOSUN, Sibel & Nuray ALAGÖZLÜ
2023. THE EFFECT OF INTERACTIONAL STRATEGY TRAINING ON PEER COLLABORATION AND INTERACTION PATTERNS. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 33:2 ► pp. 701 ff. DOI logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane, Rhonda Oliver & Yohana Gil‐Berrio
2022. Examining Deductive Versus Guided Instruction From an Interactionist Perspective. Language Learning 72:S1 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Gallardo-del-Puerto, Francisco & María Martínez-Adrián
2022. Task-modality effects on young learners’ language-related episodes in collaborative dialogue. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 480 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
2022. Peer interaction and attention to form in web-based synchronous and asynchronous L2 collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kirchhoff, Natalie
2022. interacción entre pares y el input escrito. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades 11:Monográfico ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Leow, Ronald P., Rosa M. Manchón & Charlene Polio
2022. Chapter 13. Writing. In Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Canals, Laia
2021. Multimodality and translanguaging in negotiation of meaning. Foreign Language Annals 54:3 ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Feick, Diana & Antonie Alm
2021. Gruppenarbeit in Zeiten der sozialen Isolation: Zur Nutzung und Wahrnehmung von Breakout-Räumen. Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache 48:5 ► pp. 516 ff. DOI logo
Hidalgo, María Ángeles & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. The influence of task repetition type on young EFL learners’ attention to form. Language Teaching Research 25:4 ► pp. 565 ff. DOI logo
La Russa, Francesca & Elena Nuzzo
2021. Peer corrective feedback as an opportunity for metalinguistic reflection in tandem telecollaboration. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 8:2 DOI logo
Lázaro-Ibarrola, Amparo & María Ángeles Hidalgo
2021. Give me a second chance. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Lázaro-Ibarrola, Amparo & María Ángeles Hidalgo
2024. Collaborative writing among young EFL learners in a school context: product and process. The Language Learning Journal 52:3 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Martínez-Adrián, María & Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto
2021. Task modality and language-related episodes in young learners: An attempt to manage accuracy and editing. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110528 ff. DOI logo
Martínez-Adrián, María, M. Juncal Gutiérrez-Mangado, Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto & María Basterrechea
2021. Language-related episodes by young CLIL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Nuzzo, Elena & Diego Cortés Velásquez
2021. Minding the gap. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 5:2 DOI logo
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet
2021. Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Roca de Larios, Julio, Francisco Javier García Hernández & Yvette Coyle
2021. A theoretically-grounded classification of EFL children’s formulation strategies in collaborative writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Zalbidea, Janire
2021. ON THE SCOPE OF OUTPUT IN SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane, María del Pilar García Mayo & Rhonda Oliver
2020. The effect of task repetition on the patterns of interaction of ESL children. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:1 ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2020. Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing task. Language Teaching for Young Learners 2:1 ► pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2020. Chapter 1. Child EFL grammar learning through a collaborative writing task. In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55], ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: when form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Youn-hee
2020. Willingness to engage: the importance of what learners bring to pair work. Language Awareness 29:2 ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi & Jonathan Newton
2020. Learner proficiency and EFL learning through task rehearsal and performance. Language Teaching Research 24:5 ► pp. 588 ff. DOI logo
Saller, Marcus
2020. Chapter 12. The meaning-making potential of collaborative L2 writing at tertiary level. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Storch, Neomy & Masatoshi Sato
2020. Comparing the Same Task in ESL vs. EFL Learning Contexts: An Activity Theory Perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane & Rhonda Oliver
2019. Negative feedback on task repetition: ESL vs. EFL child settings. The Language Learning Journal 47:3 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
KIM, KATHY MINHYE & ALINE GODFROID
2019. Should We Listen or Read? Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Knowledge . The Modern Language Journal 103:3 ► pp. 648 ff. DOI logo
Manchón, Rosa M. & Olena Vasylets
2019. Language Learning Through Writing: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda & Agurtzane Azkarai
2019. Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 1:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Swain, Merrill & Yuko Watanabe
2019. Languaging: Collaborative Dialogue as a Source of Second Language Learning. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sydorenko, Tetyana, John Hellermann, Steven L. Thorne & Vanessa Howe
2019. Mobile Augmented Reality and Language‐Related Episodes. TESOL Quarterly 53:3 ► pp. 712 ff. DOI logo
Alcón-Soler, Eva
2018. Chapter 3. Effects of task supported language teaching on learners’ use and knowledge of email request mitigators. In Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10], ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
del Pilar García Mayo, María
2018. Dictogloss Technique. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
del Pilar García Mayo, María
2024. Dictogloss Technique. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Loewen, Shawn & Masatoshi Sato
2018. Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching 51:3 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi
2017. Interaction Mindsets, Interactional Behaviors, and L2 Development: An Affective‐Social‐Cognitive Model. Language Learning 67:2 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Baralt, Melissa, Laura Gurzynski-Weiss & YouJin Kim
2016. 8. Engagement with the language. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Gilabert, Roger, Rosa Manchón & Olena Vasylets
2016. Mode in Theoretical and Empirical TBLT Research: Advancing Research Agendas. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Loewen, Shawn & Dominik Wolff
2016. 6. Peer interaction in F2F and CMC contexts. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Philp, Jenefer
2016. New pathways in researching interaction. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Philp, Jenefer & Susan Duchesne
2016. Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Paula Viveros
2016. 3. Interaction or collaboration? Group dynamics in the foreign language classroom. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.