Article published in:
Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL
Edited by Ana Llinares and Tom Morton
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 47] 2017
► pp. 125144
References

References

Al-Arishi, A.Y.
(1994) Role-play, real-play, and surreal-play in the ESOL classroom. ELT Journal, 48(4), 337–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berry, M.
(1981) Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis (pp. 120–145). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
(2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C.
(2006) Learning the language of school history: the role of linguistics in mapping the writing demands of the secondary school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 413–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C., & O’Halloran, K.
(2008) Researching argumentation in educational contexts: New directions, new methods. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 219–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2007) Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T.
(2006) Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 241–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, S., McNaught, L., & Humphrey, S.
(2011) Understanding joint construction in the tertiary context. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(2), 135–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eggins, S., & Slade, D.
(1997) Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. I. M.
(2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joughin, G.
(2010) A short guide to oral assessment. Leeds: Leeds Met Press in association with University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
Kosti, K., Κοndoyianni, A., & Tsiaras, A.
(2015) Fostering historical empathy through drama‐in‐ education: A pilot study on secondary school students in Greece. Drama Research, 6(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2015) The role of different tasks in CLIL students’ use of evaluative language. System, 54, 69–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., & Morton, T.
(2010) Historical explanations as situated practice in content and language integrated learning. Classroom Discourse, 1(1), 46–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., & Nikula, T.
(2016). Evaluative language use by teachers and students in CLIL across contexts: integrating SFL and pragmatic approaches. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz Milne, P. Moore, & U. Smit Eds. Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Llinares, A., & Pascual Peña, I.
(2015) A genre approach to the effect of academic questions on CLIL students’ language production. Language and Education, 29(1), 15–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maillat, D., & Serra, C.
(2009) Immersive education and cognitive strategies: Can the obstacle be the advantage in a multilingual society? International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 186–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
(2007) Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mohan, B., & Beckett, G. H.
(2003) A functional approach to research on content-based language learning: Recasts in causal explanations. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 421–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P.
(2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Nikula, T.
(2007) The IRF pattern and space for interaction: comparing CLIL and EFL classrooms. In C. Dalton-Puffer, & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 179–204). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nikula, T., Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2013) European research on CLIL classroom discourse. International Journal of Immersion and Content Based Education, 1(1), 70–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
North, S., Coffin, C., & Hewings, A.
(2008) Using exchange structure analysis to explore argument in text-based computer conferences. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 257–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M.
(2008) Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (Companion Volume) (pp. 13–16). Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S., & Leopold, L.
(2012) A critical role for role-playing pedagogy. TESL Canada Journal, 29(2), 121–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, S.
(2008) Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 277–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, S.
(2011) Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A.
(2009) CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written productions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, & R.M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Banegas, Darío Luis
2017. Teaching linguistics to low-level English language users in a teacher education programme: an action research study. The Language Learning Journal  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 march 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.