Part of
Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL
Edited by Ana Llinares and Tom Morton
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 47] 2017
► pp. 125144
Al-Arishi, A.Y.
(1994) Role-play, real-play, and surreal-play in the ESOL classroom. ELT Journal, 48(4), 337–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, M.
(1981) Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis (pp. 120–145). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
(2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C.
(2006) Learning the language of school history: the role of linguistics in mapping the writing demands of the secondary school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 413–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C., & O’Halloran, K.
(2008) Researching argumentation in educational contexts: New directions, new methods. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 219–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T.
(2006) Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 241–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, S., McNaught, L., & Humphrey, S.
(2011) Understanding joint construction in the tertiary context. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(2), 135–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, S., & Slade, D.
(1997) Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. I. M.
(2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joughin, G.
(2010) A short guide to oral assessment. Leeds: Leeds Met Press in association with University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
Kosti, K., Κοndoyianni, A., & Tsiaras, A.
(2015) Fostering historical empathy through drama‐in‐ education: A pilot study on secondary school students in Greece. Drama Research, 6(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2015) The role of different tasks in CLIL students’ use of evaluative language. System, 54, 69–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., & Morton, T.
(2010) Historical explanations as situated practice in content and language integrated learning. Classroom Discourse, 1(1), 46–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., & Nikula, T.
2016). Evaluative language use by teachers and students in CLIL across contexts: integrating SFL and pragmatic approaches. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz Milne, P. Moore, & U. Smit Eds. Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education Bristol Multilingual Matters
Llinares, A., & Pascual Peña, I.
(2015) A genre approach to the effect of academic questions on CLIL students’ language production. Language and Education, 29(1), 15–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maillat, D., & Serra, C.
(2009) Immersive education and cognitive strategies: Can the obstacle be the advantage in a multilingual society? International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 186–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
(2007) Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mohan, B., & Beckett, G. H.
(2003) A functional approach to research on content-based language learning: Recasts in causal explanations. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 421–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P.
(2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Nikula, T.
(2007) The IRF pattern and space for interaction: comparing CLIL and EFL classrooms. In C. Dalton-Puffer, & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 179–204). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nikula, T., Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2013) European research on CLIL classroom discourse. International Journal of Immersion and Content Based Education, 1(1), 70–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
North, S., Coffin, C., & Hewings, A.
(2008) Using exchange structure analysis to explore argument in text-based computer conferences. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 257–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M.
(2008) Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (Companion Volume) (pp. 13–16). Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S., & Leopold, L.
(2012) A critical role for role-playing pedagogy. TESL Canada Journal, 29(2), 121–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, S.
(2008) Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 277–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, S.
(2011) Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A.
(2009) CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written productions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, & R.M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Alejo-González, Rafael, Manuel Lucero, Mary Schleppegrell & Ana Sánchez
2023. Student-teacher interaction in CLIL and non-CLIL elementary education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 11:1  pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Lo, Yuen Yi, Angel M. Y. Lin & Yiqi Liu
2023. Exploring content and language co-construction in CLIL with semantic waves. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:3  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.