Chapter 3
Neural complexity meets lexical complexity
An issue both in language and in neuroscience
Complexity Theory provides avenues for understanding many aspects of language acquisition and use, including the language neuroscientists use to label the brain and to think about its structure and functions. A major concern for neuroscience has been the mapping of structure to function. The tendency has been to seek one-to-one mappings between the two, but advances in research have revealed that the brain is characterized by degeneracy in which two or more architecturally different structures can serve the same function. Thus, the brain can operate with many-to-one mappings. This complexity in neural structure is met with the complexity of synonymy in the lexicon of human language that is used to describe the brain. In this chapter I discuss the relationship between degeneracy and complexity and draw an analogy between neural degeneracy and lexical complexity, specifically as seen in synonymy.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Degeneracy
- Degeneracy, complexity, and synonymy
- Synonymy and degeneracy: The case of “motivation”
- One response from neuroscience to the degeneracy/synonymy issue
- Other responses: Evolutionary and semiotic
- Network neural architectures
- The ultimate complexity response: Mind-brain distinctions
- The structure-function/ degeneracy-synonymy conundrum
- Conclusion
-
References
References
Anderson, M. L.
(
2014)
After phonology: Reuse and the interactive brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barrett, L. F.
(
2006)
Solving the emotional paradox: Categorization and experience of emotion.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 20–46.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barrett, L. F.
(
2009)
The future of psychology: Connecting mind to brain.
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 326–339.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barrett, L. F.
(
2014)
The conceptual act theory: A précis.
Emotion Review, 6, 292–297.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barrett, L. F. & Satpute, A. B.
(
2013)
Large-scale brain networks in affect in and social neuroscience: Towards an integrated functional architecture of the brain.
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23, 361–372.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bilder, R. M., Sabb, F. W., Parker, D. S., Kolar, D., Chu, W. W., Fox, J., Freimer, N. B., Poldrack, R. P.
(
2009)
Cognitive ontologies for neuropsychiatric phenomics research.
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 14, 419–450.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danziger, K.
(
1997)
Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deacon, T. W.
(
2013/2012)
Incomplete nature. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edelman, G. M.
(
1987)
Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York, NY: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edelman, G. M.
(
1989)
The remembered present. New York: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edelman, G.M.
(
1992)
Bright air brilliant fire: On the matter of mind. New York: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edelman, G. M. & Gally, J. A.
(
2001)
Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science United States of America, 98, 13763–13768.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordin, M. D.
(
2015)
Scientific babel: How science was done before and after global English. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hastings, J., Frishkoff, G. A., Smith, B., Jensen, M., Poldrack, R. A., Lomax, J., Bandrowsky, A., Imam, F., Turner, J. K., & Martone, M. E.
(
2014)
Interdisciplinary perspectives on development, integration, and application of cognitive ontologies.
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Honey, C. J., Thivierge, J-P., Sporns, O.
(
2010)
Can structure predict function in the human brain? NeuroImage, 52, 766–776.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LeDoux, J.
(
2014)
Coming to terms with fear.
PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), 111, 2871–2878.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LeDoux, J.
(
2015)
Feelings: What are they & how does the brain make them? American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 1, Winter, 97–111.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. N.
(
1981)
Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Logan, R. & Schumann, J. H.
(
2005)
The symbolosphere, conceptualization, language and neo-duality.
Semiotica, 155, 201–214.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pavlenko, A.
(
2008)
Emotion and emotion-laden in words in the bilingual lexicon.
Bilingualism, Language, and Cognition, 11, 147–164.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peirce, C. S.
(
1897, 1903)
Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In
J. Buchner (Ed.),
The philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 98–119). New York: Dover Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pessoa, L.
(
2014)
Understanding brain networks and brain organization.
Physics of Life Review, 11, pp. 400–435.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kolar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., Parker, T. S., Sabb, F. W. Sabb, F. W. & Bilder, R. P.
(
2011)
The cognitive atlas: Toward knowledge foundation for the cognitive neurosciences.
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Price, C. J. & Friston, K. J.
(
2002)
Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy.
TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 6, 416–421.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Price, C. J. & Friston, K. J.
(
2005)
Functional ontology is for cognition: The systematic definition of structure and function.
Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 262–275.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schumann, J. H.
(
1997)
The neurobiology of affect in language. Malden, MA: Blackwell (also published as a special issue of
Language Learning, 48, 1998).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schumann, J. H.
(
2003)
The evolution of the symbolic sphere. Paper presented at the Great Ideas and Social Science Lectures, University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Governance, November 21.
Schumann, J. H.
(
2012)
Symbolosphere. In
D. Favareau,
P. Cobley, &
K. Kull (Eds),
A more developed sign: Interpreting the were of Jesper Hoffmeyer (pp. 281–282) (
Tartu Semiotics Library, 10). Tartu, Estonia: Tartu University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schumann, J. H., Crowell, S. E., Jones, N. E., Lee, N., Schuchert, S. A., Wood, A. W.
(
2004)
The neurobiology of learning: Perspectives from second language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sporns, O.
(
2011)
Networks in the brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sporns, O.
(
2014)
Contributions and challenges or network models in cognitive neuroscience.
Nature Neuroscience, 5, 652–660.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stanojević, N.
(
2009)
Cognitive synonymy: A general overview.
Facta Universitatis Series: Linguistics and Literature, 7, 193–200.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wager, T. D., Kang, J., Johnson, T. D., Nichols, T. E., Satpute, A. B., Barrett, L. F.
(
2015)
Of Bayesian model of category-specific Emotional brain responses.
PLoS Computational Biology.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Dörnyei, Zoltán
2019.
From Integrative Motivation to Directed Motivational Currents: The Evolution of the Understanding of L2 Motivation over Three Decades. In
The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning,
► pp. 39 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Pallotti, Gabriele
2022.
Cratylus’ silence: On the philosophy and methodology of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory in SLA.
Second Language Research 38:3
► pp. 689 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
SCHUMANN, JOHN H.
2019.
Sources of Definitional Problems in the Study of Emotion: Nonphysical Aspects of Mind.
The Modern Language Journal 103:2
► pp. 536 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.