Cover not available
Part of
Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman
Edited by Lourdes Ortega and ZhaoHong Han
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 48] 2017
► pp. 97–122

Chapter 5
The emerging need for methods appropriate to study dynamic systems

Individual differences in motivational dynamics

| Cape Breton University
| Cape Breton University
| Cape Breton University
| University of East London
There is a pressing need to develop methodology to study complex dynamic systems. In this chapter we review 12 specific methods that offer solutions to the methodological challenges presented by a dynamic approach. Specific methods include several qualitative interview designs, longitudinal cluster analysis, Q-methodology, the trajectory equifinality model, the idiodynamic method, latent growth modelling, and change point analysis. The collection of methods provides an overview of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches that have been applied to the study of complex dynamic systems. Each reviewed procedure has been applied to the study of motivation for language learning and demonstrates how to take account of multiple timescales, initial conditions, and dynamic stability among other issues. Even as methods are being refined, novel research findings are emerging. The lasting impact of Complexity Theory on the field of second language development depends on closing the present gap between metaphorical and/or theoretical development and specific research methods.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Lessons for SLA from psychology
  • CDST in SLA, applied motivation
  • Specific methods for the CDST study of individual differences in motivation
    • Longitudinal qualitative interview design
    • Retrodictive qualitative modelling
    • Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
    • Two-stage qualitative interview design
    • Qualitative interview design gathering data on multiple timescales
    • Longitudinal cluster analysis
    • Triangulation
    • Q methodology
    • Trajectory equifinality model
    • Idiodynamics
    • Latent growth curve modelling
    • Change point analysis
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.06mac
References (69)
References
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. Oxford, MA: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
(1962). The general and the unique in psychological science. Journal of Personality, 30(3), 405–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baba, K. & Nitta, R. (2014). Phase transitions in the development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64(1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & Crombie, G. (2003). Modelling and testing change: An introduction to the latent growth curve model. Understanding Statistics, 2(3), 177–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2014). Complexity theory and the social sciences: The state of the art. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corbetta, D., & Ulrich, B. D. (2008). Esther Thelen’s legacy: A dynamic world that continues to reach out to others. Infancy, 13(3), 197–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csizér, K., & Jamieson, J. (2013). Cluster analysis. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K. (2011). Epilogue. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 123–127). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247–267). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (2015). Introduction: Applying complex dynamic systems principles to empirical research on L2 motivation. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 1–7). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (2015). Motivational dynamics. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fink, S. (2013). An exploration of the dynamic processes affecting EFL learners’ willingness to communicate during speaking activities. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
Gregersen, T. & MacIntyre, P. D. (2015). ‘I can see a little bit of you in myself’: A dynamic systems approach to the inner dialogue between teacher and learner selves. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 260–284). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Meza, M. D. (2014). The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 574–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. S. (1954). A primer of Freudian psychology. New York, NY: World Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henry, A. (2015). The dynamics of L3 motivation: A longitudinal interview/observation based study. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 315–342). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hiver, P. (2015). Once burned, twice shy: The dynamic development of system immunity in teachers. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 214–237). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Howritz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irie, K. & Ryan, S. (2015). Study abroad and the dynamics of change in learner L2 self-concept. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 343–366). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity Theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z-H. Han (Eds.), Complexity Theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Legewie, N. (2013). An Introduction to applied data analysis with qualitative comparative analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 14(3). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Lewis, M. D. (2011). Dynamic systems approaches: Cool enough? Hot enough? Child Development Perspectives 5(4), 279–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowie, W. (2017). Lost in state space? – Methodological considerations in Complex Dynamic Theory approaches to SLD research. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity Theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D. (2010). Perspectives on motivation for second language learning on the 50th anniversary of Gardner & Lambert (1959). Language Teaching, 43, 374–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). The idiodynamic method: A closer look at the dynamics of communication traits. Communication Research Reports 29(4), 361–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The dynamics of sexual relationship development. In R. S. Stewart (Ed.), Talk about sex: A multidisciplinary discussion (pp. 67–83). Sydney, Canada: CBU Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D. & Serroul, A. (2015). Motivation on a per-second timescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 109–138). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z, & Henry, A. (2015). Conclusion: Hot enough to be cool: The promise of dynamic systems research. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 419–429). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McArdle, J. J. & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves with developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58(1), 110–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McArdle, J. J. & Kadlec, K. M. (2013). Structural equation models. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods, Volume 2, Statistical analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). The self from a complexity perspective. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 160–176). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2015). Dynamics of the self: A multilevel nested systems approach. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 139–163). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nitta, R. (2013). Understanding motivational evolution in the EFL classroom: A longitudinal study from a dynamic systems perspective. In M. T. Apple, D. DaSilva & T. Fellner (Eds.), Foreign language motivation in Japan (pp. 268–290). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nitta, R. & Baba, K. (2015). Self-regulation in the evolution of the ideal l2 self: A complex dynamic systems approach to the L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 367–396). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Papi, M., & Teimouri, Y. (2014). Language learner motivational types: A cluster analysis study. Language Learning, 64(3), 493–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2012). The dynamic nature of motivation in language learning: A classroom perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 2(2), 249–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinel, K. & Csizér, K. (2015). Changes in motivation, anxiety, and self-efficacy during the course of an academic writing seminar. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 164–194). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Wichman, A. L., MacCallum, R. C., & Briggs, N. E. (2008). Latent growth curve modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ragin, C. (1989). The logic of the comparative method and the algebra of logic. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 1(2), 373–398.Google Scholar
(2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. In B. Rihoux & C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(2009b). Reflections on casing and case-oriented research. In D. Byrne & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of case-based methods (pp. 523–534). London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rihoux, B., & Lobe, B. (2009). The case for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison. In D. Byrne & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of case-based methods (pp. 222–242). London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryckman, R. M. (2008). Theories of personality (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Sato, T. (2009). TEM de hajimeru shitsuteki kenkyu [Qualitative research using TEM]. Tokyo: Seishinshobo.Google Scholar
Steenbeek, H., Jansen, L. & van Geert, P. (2012). Scaffolding dynamics and the emergence of problematic learning trajectories. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 64–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, R., Plumridge, L., & Holland, J. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: A developing methodology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6(3), 185–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J. & Sato, T. (2006). Historically structured sampling (HSS): How can psychology’s methodology become tuned into the reality of the historical nature of cultural psychology? In J. Straub, C. Kölbl, D. Weidemann & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of meaning: Advances in cultural and cross-cultural psychology (pp. 215–251). Bielefeld, Germany: Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability and DST. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 179–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., van Geert, P., van Dijk, M., & Schmid, M. S. (2011). How to sections. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.) A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 129–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Waninge, F. (2015). Motivation, emotion and cognition: Attractor states in the classroom. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 195–213). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Waninge, F., Dörnyei, Z., & de Bot, K. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning: Change, stability and context. Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 704–723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, S. & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Q methodology: The inverted factor technique. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 28(1–2), 63–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Yashima, T. & Arano, K. (2015). Understanding EFL learners’ motivational dynamics: A three-level model from a dynamic systems and sociocultural perspective. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 285–314). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
You, J. C. & Chan, L. (2015). The dynamics of L2 imagery in future motivational self-guides. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 397–418). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Henry, Alastair, Cecilia Thorsen & Peter D. MacIntyre
2024. Willingness to communicate in a multilingual context: part two, person-context dynamics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:4 ► pp. 1033 ff. DOI logo
Henry, Alastair, Cecilia Thorsen & Peter D. MacIntyre
2024. Willingness to communicate in a multilingual context: part one, a time-serial study of developmental dynamics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:4 ► pp. 937 ff. DOI logo
Piniel, Katalin
2024. Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and Language Anxiety. In Investigating Foreign Language Anxiety [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Fraschini, Nicola
2023. Language learners’ emotional dynamics: insights from a Q methodology intensive single-case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum 36:2 ► pp. 222 ff. DOI logo
Freeborn, Lani, Sible Andringa, Gabriela Lunansky & Judith Rispens
2023. Network analysis for modeling complex systems in SLA research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:2 ► pp. 526 ff. DOI logo
Han, ZhaoHong, Eun Young Kang & Sarah Sok
2023. The complexity epistemology and ontology in second language acquisition: A critical review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:5 ► pp. 1388 ff. DOI logo
Fogal, Gary G.
2022. Second language writing from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Teaching 55:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Hiver, Phil, Ali H. Al-Hoorie & Reid Evans
2022. COMPLEX DYNAMIC SYSTEMS THEORY IN LANGUAGE LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:4 ► pp. 913 ff. DOI logo
Morea, Nicola
2022. Investigating change in subjectivity: The analysis of Q-sorts in longitudinal research. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1:3 ► pp. 100025 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Shuang, Huiping Zhang & Cun Zhang
2022. A Dynamic Systems Study on Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in English Writing Development by Chinese University Students. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Pinner, Richard S. & Richard J. Sampson
2021. Humanizing TESOL Research Through the Lens of Complexity Thinking. TESOL Quarterly 55:2 ► pp. 633 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Jianbo
2021. Revisiting Research Methods in Language Learning Psychology From a Complexity Dynamic System Theory Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Levine, Glenn S.
2020. References. The Modern Language Journal 104:S1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Dörnyei, Zoltán
2019. From Integrative Motivation to Directed Motivational Currents: The Evolution of the Understanding of L2 Motivation over Three Decades. In The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning, ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Zheng, Yongyan, Xiuchuan Lu & Wei Ren
2019. Profiling Chinese university students’ motivation to learn multiple languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40:7 ► pp. 590 ff. DOI logo
ZHENG, YONGYAN, XIUCHUAN LU & WEI REN
2020. Tracking the Evolution of Chinese Learners’ Multilingual Motivation Through a Longitudinal Q Methodology. The Modern Language Journal 104:4 ► pp. 781 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.