Chapter 8
Using metacognitive strategies to induce phase shifts
A complex systems approach to L2 listening instruction
In this chapter, we critically self-evaluate a previously published study through the lens of Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theory. In this way we propose a Complex Adaptive Systems approach to second language (L2) language development in order to examine the effectiveness of explicit listening instruction and metacognition. We do this by conceiving of problems in listening comprehension as attractors in the state space of L2 language development and interpreting explicit instruction as a way of inducing a phase shift. The original study used a traditional pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of a teaching method using metacognitive listening strategies and audiovisual media. We present the original design and results, discuss why this method is insufficient for considering language from a usage-inspired complexity perspective, and offer some suggestions for how it may be re-conceptualized via CAS theory. We argue that a complex systems perspective allows for more freedom in interpreting results by taking into account the nonlinear nature of language development and its inherent variability.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Complexity theory and language development
- Critical features of complex systems
- Systems and timescales in L2 instruction
- Complexity theory, listening, and metacognition in the classroom
- The original study
- A critical self-analysis using complexity theory: Design problems from a complexity perspective
- Re-conceptualizing the research questions
- Designing studies and interpreting results with CAS theory
- Conclusion
-
Note
-
References
References
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M.
(
2011)
Exploring the utility of action research to investigate second-language classrooms as complex systems.
Educational Action Research, 19(2), 121–136.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(
1987)
Competition, variation, and language learning. In
B. MacWhinney (Ed.),
Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Becker, S. R., & Sturm, J. L.
(
2017)
Effects of audiovisual media on L2 listening comprehension: A preliminary study in French.
CALICO, 34(2), 1–31.
Bybee, J.
(
2006)
From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition.
Language, 82(4), 711–733.
Calais, G. J.
(
2008)
Microgenetic analysis of learning: Measuring change as it occurs.
National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 1–7.
Dörnyei, Z.
(
2009)
Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment.
Language Learning, 59, 230–248.
Ellis, N. C.
(
1998)
Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning.
Language Learning, 48, 631–664.
Ellis, N. C.
(
2008)
The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition.
Modern Language Journal, 92, 232–249.
Goh, C.
(
2000)
A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems.
System, 28, 55–75.
Goh, C.
(
2008)
Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications.
RELC Journal, 39(2), 188–213.
Hasan, A. S.
(
2000)
Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems.
Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13, 137–153.
Hohenberger, A., & Peltzer-Karpf, A.
(
2009)
Language learning from the perspective of nonlinear dynamic systems.
Linguistics, 47(2), 481–511.
Holland, J. H.
(
1998)
Emergence: From chaos to order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holt, R. F.
(
2011)
Enhancing speech discrimination through stimulus repetition.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1431–1447.
Kauffman, S. A.
(
1995)
At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
(
1997)
The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?).
Second Language Research, 14, 301–347.
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(
1997)
Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition.
Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(
2006)
The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English.
Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(
2008)
Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levy, E. S., & Strange, W.
(
2008)
Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience.
Journal of Phonetics, 36, 141–157.
Lorenz, E. N.
(
1963)
Deterministic nonperiodic flow.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130–141.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B.
(
1994)
A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
Thomson, R.
(
2012)
Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach.
Language Learning, 62(4), 1231–1258.
Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L.
van Geert, P.
(
1994)
Vygotskian dynamics of development.
Human Development, 37, 346–365.
van Geert, P., & Van Dijk, M.
(
2002)
Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data.
Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 340–374.
Vandergrift, L.
(
1998)
La métacognition et la compréhension auditive en langue seconde.
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 83–105.
Vandergrift, L.
(
2002)
‘It was nice to see that our predictions were right’: Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension.
Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(4), 555–575.
Vandergrift, L.
(
2003)
From prediction through reflection: Guiding students through the process of L2 listening.
Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 425–440.
Vandergrift, L.
(
2004)
Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25.
Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H.
(
2010)
Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study.
Language Learning, 60(2), 470–497.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P.
(
2006)
Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations.
Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M.
(
2008)
Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective.
Modern Language Journal, 92, 214–231.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Dickinson, Paul
2020.
Understanding participation in CALL vocabulary tasks through complexity
theory. In
CALL for widening participation: short papers from EUROCALL 2020,
► pp. 57 ff.
Godwin-Jones, Robert
2019.
Re-orienting CALL through the lens of complexity theory. In
CALL and complexity – short papers from EUROCALL 2019,
► pp. 151 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.