The present chapter illustrates how Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) can inform a usage-inspired approach to researching and teaching L2 writing in a postsecondary context. We first outline an SFL perspective to multilingual academic literacy development and then illustrate this perspective by means of longitudinal, corpus data on nominalization use in the English academic writing of francophone university students over four years. By means of quantitative indicators (nominalization frequencies, erroneous forms, measures of L2 proficiency scores and syntactic complexity) and qualitative analyses (of the discourse functions that nominalization serve), we argue that French-speaking writers’ use of nominalization in English indexes both language-specific and language-interdependent aspects of multilingual academic literacy development. We conclude with implications for further SFL-informed research and instruction that aims to promote multilingual academic literacy development by raising crosslinguistic awareness of the forms and functions of nominalization in academic discourse.
Article outline
Introduction
An SFL perspective to multilingual academic literacy development
Nominalization use and academic literacy development
An exploratory study of nominalization use
Curricular context and participants
Data sources
Operationalizing and counting nominalizations
Insights from quantitative analyses of nominalization
Additional insights from finer-grained analyses of two focal learners
Implications for usage-based theory-building, research, and instruction
(2004) Oxford placement tests 1: Test pack. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, K.
(2011) The scientific revolution and its repercussions on the translation of technical discourse. The Translator, 17(2), 189–210.
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D. & Conrad, S., Leech, G.
(2002) Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, P.
(2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Byrnes, H.
(2009) Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 50–66.
Caffarel, A.
(2006) A systemic functional grammar of French. London: Continuum.
(2006) Grammatical metaphor: Academic language development in Latino students in Spanish. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 147–163). London: Continuum.
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J.
(2007) Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221–240. Available from [URL]
Devrim, D. Y.
(2015) Grammatical metaphor: What do we mean? What exactly are we searching?Functional Linguistics, 2(3), 1–15.
Gentil, G.
(2011) A biliteracy agenda for genre research. Journal of Second Language Writing. 20(1), 6–23.
Gentil, G.
in press). Multilingualism as a writing resource. In J. Liontas Ed. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching Vol. Teaching Writing co-edited by D. Belcher & A. Hirvela New York, NY Wiley
Gebhard, M., Chen, I., & Britton, L.
(2014) “Miss, nominalization is a nominalization:” English language learners’ use of SFL metalanguage and their literacy practices. Linguistics and Education, 26, 106–125.
Gilquin, G., Granger, S., & Paquot, M.
(2007) Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 319–335.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1989) Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J.
(1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburg University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I .M.
(2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
(2013) An exploration of Chinese EFL learner’s development of grammatical metaphor. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 161–178.
Liardét, C.
(2016) Grammatical metaphor: Distinguishing success. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 109–118.
Littré, D.
(2015) A Cognitive, longitudinal study of the use of the English present progressive by intermediate and advanced French-speaking learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Lyster, R.
(2015) Using form-focused tasks to integrate language across the immersion curriculum. System, 54, 4–13.
(2009) Meaning in the making: Meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1), 206–229.
McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., Cai, Z., & Graesser, A.
(2005, January 1) Coh-Metrix version 1.4. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from [URL]
Meunier, F.
(2015a) Introduction to the LONGDALE project. In E. Castello, K. Ackerley, & F. Coccetta (Eds.), Studies in learner corpus linguistics: Research and applications for foreign language teaching and assessment (pp. 123–126). Bern: Peter Lang.
Meunier, F.
(2015b) Developmental patterns in learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 379–400). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Meunier, F., & Littré, D.
(2013) Tracking learners’ progress: Adopting a dual ‘corpus cum experimental data’ approach. Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 61–76.
Ortega, L.
(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518.
Ortega, L.
(2015) Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing, 82–94.
Paquot, M.
(2012) The LEAD dictionary-cum-writing aid: an integrated dictionary and corpus tool. In S. Granger, S. Paquot & M. Paquot (Eds.), Electronic lexicography (pp. 163–185). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rayson, P.
(2009) Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Department, Lancaster University. [URL]
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
(2012) Learning to write, reading to learn. London: Equinox.
Rundell, M., & Granger, S.
(2007) From corpora to confidence. English Teaching Professional, 50, 15–18.
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H.
(2013) Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 179–197.
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Street, B.
(1984) Literacy in theory and practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
Terblanche, L.
(2009) A comparative study of nominalisation in L1 and L2 writing and speech. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 27(1), 39–52.
Tyler, A. E.
(2010) Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 270–291.
Yasuda, S.
(2015) Exploring changes in FL writers’ meaning-making choices in summary writing: A systemic functional approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 105–121.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Khan, Moazzam Ali
2023. Book review. Assessing Writing 58 ► pp. 100782 ff.
Meunier, Fanny, Isa Hendrikx, Amélie Bulon, Kristel Van Goethem & Hubert Naets
2023. MulTINCo: multilingual traditional immersion and native corpus. Better-documented multiliteracy practices for more refined SLA studies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:5 ► pp. 572 ff.
Paquot, Magali, Hubert Naets & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Using Syntactic Co-occurrences to Trace Phraseological Complexity Development in Learner Writing: Verb + Object Structures in LONGDALE. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 122 ff.
Yeh, Ellen
2021. Intentional Plagiarism? Strategies for Teaching Language Learners Academic Integrity. Kappa Delta Pi Record 57:3 ► pp. 132 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.