Chapter published in:
Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched pedagogy
Edited by Andrea E. Tyler, Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno and Hae In Park
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 49] 2018
► pp. 315–321

Chapter 14. Usage-inspired L2 instruction

Some reflections and a heuristic

| Georgetown University
| Georgetown University

The work gathered in this collection suggests that usage-inspired second language (L2) instruction is beginning to take hold in instructed second language acquisition (SLA) and has a bright future as a researched pedagogy in support of adult L2 learning and multilingualism. In this closing chapter, we offer our personal reflections on the study of usage-inspired L2 instruction as a new research domain within instructed SLA. We also propose four broad criteria by which one might be able to judge the degree to which a particular instructional proposal is usage-inspired, related to meaningfulness, contextualization, prior knowledge, and learning goals and mechanisms.

Published online: 13 February 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.14tyl
References

References

Douglas Fir Group
(2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 1, Centenary Anniversary), 19–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2011) Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. In C. Sanz & R. P. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism (pp. 35–47). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2015) Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2016) Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J.
(2015) Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., Vol. I, pp. 309–323). Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L.
(2007) Sociocultural theory and second learning. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.) Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Madlener, K.
(2018) Do findings from artificial language learning generalize to second language classrooms? In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2005) For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Epistemological diversity and moral ends of research in instructed SLA. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 206–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. E.
(1994a) The role of repetition in perceptions of discourse coherence. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(6), 671–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994b) The role of syntactic structure in discourse structure: Signaling logical and prominence relations. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 243–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. E., & Evans, V.
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S.
(2015) What learner corpus research can contribute to multilingualism research. International Journal of Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Morton, Tom
2020. Afterword: SFL, theoretical pluralism and content and language integration at the levels of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.