Cover not available
Part of
Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched pedagogy
Edited by Andrea E. Tyler, Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno and Hae In Park
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 49] 2018
► pp. 315–321

Chapter 14
Usage-inspired L2 instruction

Some reflections and a heuristic

| Georgetown University
| Georgetown University

The work gathered in this collection suggests that usage-inspired second language (L2) instruction is beginning to take hold in instructed second language acquisition (SLA) and has a bright future as a researched pedagogy in support of adult L2 learning and multilingualism. In this closing chapter, we offer our personal reflections on the study of usage-inspired L2 instruction as a new research domain within instructed SLA. We also propose four broad criteria by which one might be able to judge the degree to which a particular instructional proposal is usage-inspired, related to meaningfulness, contextualization, prior knowledge, and learning goals and mechanisms.

Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Unifying ethos, multiple pursuits
  • The complementarity of explicit and implicit learning
  • But is it usage-inspired?: A heuristic to evaluate instructional implementations
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 13 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.14tyl
References
Douglas Fir Group
(2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 1, Centenary Anniversary), 19–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2011) Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. In C. Sanz & R. P. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism (pp. 35–47). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2015) Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2016) Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J.
(2015) Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., Vol. I, pp. 309–323). Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L.
(2007) Sociocultural theory and second learning. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.) Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Madlener, K.
(2018) Do findings from artificial language learning generalize to second language classrooms? In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2005) For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Epistemological diversity and moral ends of research in instructed SLA. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 206–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. E.
(1994a) The role of repetition in perceptions of discourse coherence. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(6), 671–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994b) The role of syntactic structure in discourse structure: Signaling logical and prominence relations. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 243–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. E., & Evans, V.
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S.
(2015) What learner corpus research can contribute to multilingualism research. International Journal of Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Morton, Tom
2023. Afterword: SFL, theoretical pluralism and content and language integration at the levels of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:3 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual
2022. A systematic review of the uses and spread of corpora and data-driven learning in CALL research during 2011–2015. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:1-2 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Suzuki, Yuichi, Masaki Eguchi & Nel de Jong
2022. Does the Reuse of Constructions Promote Fluency Development in Task Repetition? A Usage‐Based Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 56:4 ► pp. 1290 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Yuanheng (Arthur) & Xiaofei Lu
2024. Conceptualizing Corpus-Based Genre Pedagogy as Usage-Inspired Second Language Instruction. Corpus-based Studies across Humanities 1:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.