This study investigates the developmental trajectories of
L2 writing fluency in 105 university students when the same task procedure
was repeatedly used in a classroom setting throughout an academic year. The
students wrote a timed narrative composition in their English L2 along with
reflective writing in their L1 Japanese every week. Individual growth curve
modeling revealed that their writing fluency increased over a year, but the
rate of change varied significantly from person to person. Case analyses of
high- and low-growth performers suggested that the former seemed to benefit
more from task iteration, and actions that showed reflection in
action and a positive attitude toward the task may have
contributed to increased growth.
(2011) Reflection in second language writing: A longitudinal
study of task repetition from a Complexity Theory
perspective. 金城学院大学論集(社会科学編), 8, 70–101.
Baba, K., & Nitta, R.
(2014) Phase transitions in the development of writing fluency
from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64(1), 1–35.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A.
(2017) Synactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways
and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28, 147–164.
Bygate, M.
(2018) Dynamic systems theory and the issue of predictability in
task-based language: Some implications for research and practice in
TBLT. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. D. P. Garcia Mayo (Eds.), Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and
teaching (pp. 143–166). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Chan, H., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L.
(2015) Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in
identical twins. Language Learning, 65, 298–325.
Fogal, G. G.
(2019a) Tracking microgenetic changes in authorial voice
development from a complexity theory perspective. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 432–455.
Fogal, G. G.
(2019b) Investigating variability in L2 development: Extending a
complexity theory perspective on L2 writing studies and authorial
voice. Applied Linguistics, 1–27.
Friginal, E., Li, M., & Weigle, S. C.
(2014) Revisiting multiple profiles of learner compositions: A
comparison of highly rated NS and NNS essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 1–16.
Garner, J., & Crossley, S.
(2018) A latent curve model approach to studying L2 n-gram
development. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 494–511.
Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D., & Ferris, D.
(2003) Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner
compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 377–403.
Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C.
(2013) L1/L2/L3 writing development: Longitudinal case study of
a Japanese multicompetent writer. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 4–33.
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the
oral and written production of five Chinese learners of
English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.
(2019) On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems
theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 61–79.
Lavelli, M., & Fogel, A.
(2002) Developmental changes in mother-infant face-to-face
communication: Birth to 3 months. Developmental Psychology, 38, 288–305.
Lewis, M. D.
(2000) The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an
integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71(1), 36–43.
McCarthey, S. J., Guo, Y.-H., & Cummins, S.
(2005) Understanding changes in elementary Mandarin students’ L1
and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 71–104.
McKean, C., Mensah, F. K., Eadie, P., Bavin, E. L., Bretherton, L., Cini, E., & Reilly, S.
(2015) Levers for language growth: Characteristics and
predictors of language trajectories between 4 and 7
years. PLOS ONE, 10, e0134251.
Mehta, S. R., & Al-Mahrooqi, R.
(2015) Can thinking be taught? Linking critical thinking and
writing in an EFL context. RELC Journal, 46, 23–36.
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q.
(2011) Kindergarten children’s growth trajectories in reading
and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 472–488.
Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & vom Hofe, R.
(2013) Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics
achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive
strategies. Child Development, 84, 1475–1490.
Nguyen, H., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2018) Using tasks to teach formulaic sequences: Interindividual
and intraindividual variation. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. D. P. Garcia Mayo (Eds.), Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and
teaching (pp. 167–193). Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2014) Task repetition and L2 writing development: A
longitudinal study from a dynamic systems
perspective. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchon (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching: Insights from
writing (pp. 107–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sasaki, M., Kozaki, Y., & Ross, S. J.
(2017) The impact of normative environments on learner
motivation and L2 reading ability growth. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 163–178.
Schön, D. A.
(1987) Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B.
(2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event
occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M.
(2010) Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and
complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of
Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532–553.
Taylor, W. A.
(2000) Change-point analysis: A powerful new tool for detecting
changes. [URL]> (7January 2020).
Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. L.
(2015) Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on
writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition, 38, 79–95.
Vercellotti, M. L.
(2017) The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in
second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics, 38, 90–111.
Verspoor, M., & Smiskova, H.
(2012) Foreign language writing development from a dynamic
usage-based perspective. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 17–46). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M.
(2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic
systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231.
Vyatkina, N.
(2012) The development of second language writing complexity in
groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus
study. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 576–598.
Weissberg, R.
(1998) Acquiring English syntax through journal
writing. College ESL, 8(1), 1–22.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Attila M. Wind
2023. Dynamic development of cohesive devices in English as a second language writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Fogal, Gary G.
2022. Second language writing from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Teaching 55:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Rokoszewska, Katarzyna
2023. Dynamic Relationships Between Lexical Frequency Levels in L2 English Writing at Secondary School: A Learner Corpus Analysis. In Contemporary Issues in Foreign Language Education [English Language Education, 32], ► pp. 191 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.