Edited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. 27–48
Chapter 2Coordination of linguistic subsystems as a sign of
automatization?
This study explored retrodictively differences in developmental patterns between a learner who makes some progress and one that does not. Their twelve successive writings were analyzed on holistically scored measures of complexity, accuracy, fluency, idiomaticity, and coherence (CAFIC) and on two analytical measures to operationalize syntactic and lexical complexity. Their developmental trajectories were explored with visual graphs (LOESS curves), Monte Carlo analyses, and correlational analyses. The stronger learner showed rather synchronous development in most measures and a significant jump in lexical complexity (operationalized as average word length), suggesting a level of coordination of subsystems and therefore automaticity of the system as a whole. The weaker learner, on the other hand, showed more competitive or random patterns in the measures.
Article outline
- Introduction
- CDST and development
- The study
- Subjects
- Texts
- Holistic scoring
- Operationalizing constructs
- Statistical analyses
- Results
- Statistical analyses
- Correlation analyses
- Variability and variation over time
- Interactions of variables over time
- Discussion and conclusion
-
References
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.02hou