Chapter published in:
Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing DevelopmentEdited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. 49–78
Chapter 3The dynamic co-development of linguistic and discourse-semantic
complexity in advanced L2 writing
Yu Wang | Soochow University
Shoucun Tao | Suzhou Industrial Park Xinghui School
This study reports on an exploratory investigation of the
developmental and interaction patterns of linguistic and discourse-semantic
complexity in two advanced Chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writings.
Adopting a complex dynamic systems theory approach, this work captures
linguistic complexity by using subordination and phrasal elaboration
metrics, and semantic complexity by examining grammatical metaphor. The
findings are: (a) the two sub-systems of linguistic complexity develop
through different paths, featuring nonlinearity with progress and
regression; (b) semantic complexity generally undergoes dynamic
development – however, there seems to be inter-participant variation in
terms of transitional phases; (c) the interaction of linguistic and semantic
complexity is diversified between the subsystems and at the individual
level. The level of L2 skillfulness and integrated feedback are likely to
contribute jointly to the results. These findings have implications for both
L2 writing research and instruction.
Keywords: CDST, linguistic complexity, discourse-semantic complexity, L2 writing
Article outline
- Introduction
- Rationale
- Complexity in L2 research
- Connecting nominalization to semantic complexity
- Measuring L2 linguistic complexity
- Nominalization as an indicator of discourse-semantic complexity in advanced L2 writing
- The present study
- The setting
- The participants
- Measures
- Data coding and analysis
- Results
- Intra-variability in the development of linguistic and semantic
complexity
- Lucy
- Mary
- Interaction between linguistic complexity and semantic
complexity
- Lucy
- Mary
- Intra-variability in the development of linguistic and semantic
complexity
- Discussion
- Conclusion
-
Note -
References
Published online: 04 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.03wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.03wan
References
Baba, K., & Nitta, R.
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A.
Byrnes, H.
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H., & Norris, J. M.
Colombi, M. C.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
Cumming, A.
Flahive, D. E., & Snow, B.
Fogal, G. G.
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Gilmore, A.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C.
Johnson, M. D.
Larsen-Freeman, D.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
Lennon, P.
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
Lowie, W., Verspoor, M., & van Dijk, M.
Lu, X. F.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
Ortega, L.
Pallotti, G.
Polat, B., & Kim, Y.
Rifkin, B.
Ryshina-Pankova, M.
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H.
Ryshina-Pankova, M.
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M.
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B.
Storch, N.
Tin, T. B.
Vercellotti, M. L.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., Chan, H. P., & Vahtrick, L.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M.
Verspoor, M., Schmidt, M., & Xu, J.
Wette, R.
Yoon, H.-J., & Polio, C.
Zheng, Y. Y.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Tsehaye, Wintai, Tatiana Pashkova, Rosemarie Tracy & Shanley E. M. Allen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.