Chapter published in:

Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development
Edited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. 81–108

Chapter 4. Adaptive imitation

Formulaicity and the words of others in L2 English academic writing

Susy Macqueen | Australian National University

Ute Knoch | University of Melbourne

This chapter explores how L2 academic writers imitate adaptively as they manage the need to communicate academic content using language that aligns with the predictable patterns of the discourse community. Evidence from two studies of L2 writing is combined to explore how writers work with a dynamic store of language chunks as their emergent building blocks. One study, a cross-sectional discourse analysis of the writing of 480 test-takers (Knoch, Macqueen, & O’Hagan, 2014), investigates formulaicity and source text use in two writing tasks. The other, a longitudinal qualitative case study of a student writer (Macqueen, 2012), takes a close-up view of her word combinations and use of source texts as she revises an assignment. Taken together, the findings suggest that the early stages of L2 academic writing are characterized by greater reliance on verbatim imitation of the patterns of others and less formulaicity. Over time, L2 writers represent academic content through interweaving the words of others with their own internalized patterns in increasingly conventional manipulations.

Keywords: imitation, formulaic language, second language writing, academic literacy

Published online: 04 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.04mac

References

Abasi, A. R., Akbari, N., & Graves, B.

(2006) Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 102–117.

Arbib, M. A.

(2002) The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language. In K. Dautenhahn & C. L. Nehaniv (Eds.), Imitation in animals and artifacts (pp. 229–280). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bakhtin, M. M.

(1986) Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee (Trans.) C. Emerson & M. H. Austin (Eds.)). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T.

(2009) Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1), 1–27.

Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S.

(2014) Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 28–41.

Biber, D., & Gray, B.

(2013) Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT® test: A lexico-grammatical analysis. ETS Research Report, RR-13-04. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Boothe, B.

(2017) Constructing identity. In Petrucci Family Foundation Collection of African-American Art. Portland, OR: Portland Art Museum.

Bustamante, R. O., & Simonetti, J. A.

(2005) Is Pinus radiata invading the native vegetation in central Chile? Demographic responses in a fragmented forest. Biological Invasions, 7(2), 243–249.

Chandrasoma, R., Thompson, C., & Pennycook, A.

(2004) Beyond plagiarism: Transgressive and nontransgressive intertextuality. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 3(3), 171–193.

Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P.

(2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30–49.

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Eouanzoui, K., Erdosy, U., & James, M.

(2006) Analysis of discourse features and verification of scoring levels for independent and integrated prototype written tasks for the new TOEFL®. ETS Research Report, RR-05-13. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M.

(2005) Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 5–43.

Cumming, A., Yang, L., Qiu, C., Zhang, L., Ji, X., Wang, J., Zhan, J., Zhang, F., Xu, C., Cao, R., Yu, L., Chu, M., Liu, M., Cao, M., & Lai, C.

(2018) Students’ practices and abilities for writing from sources in English at universities in China. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 1–15.

Currie, P.

(1998) Staying out of trouble: Apparent plagiarism and academic survival. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 1–18.

de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.

(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.

Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N.

(2009) To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(2), 157–177.

Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J.

(1998) An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: CRC Press.

Ellis, N. C.

(2002) Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(02), 143–188.

(2012) Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44.

Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.

(2009) Language as a complex adaptive system. Chichester: Blackwell.

Firth, J. R.

([1951] 1968) A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952–1959 (pp. 168–205). London: Longmans Green.

Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y.

(2007) Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 440–465.

(2008) Plagiarism and second language writing in an electronic age. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 161–183.

Fortescue, M.

(2017) The abstraction engine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Granger, S.

(1998) Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 145–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gustafsson, H., & Verspoor, M.

(2017) Development of chunks in Dutch L2 learners of English. In J. Evers-Vermeul, L. Rasier, & E. Tribushinina (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and language teaching (pp. 235–262). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hirvela, A., & Du, Q.

(2013) “Why am I paraphrasing?”: Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for academic purposes, 12(2), 87–98.

Hou, J., Loerts, H., & Verspoor, M. H.

(2018) Chunk use and development in advanced Chinese L2 learners of English. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 148–168.

Howard, R. M.

(1993) A Plagiarism Pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11(3), 233–246.

Howard, R. M.

(1995) Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57(7), 788–806.

Howarth, P.

(1998) The phraseology of learner’s academic writing. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications (pp. 161–186). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hull, G., & Rose, M.

(1989) Rethinking remediation: Toward a social-cognitive understanding of problematic reading and writing. Written Communication, 6(2), 139–154.

Keck, C.

(2006) The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 261–278.

Kennedy, C., & Thorp, D.

(2007) A corpus-based investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS academic writing task. In L. Taylor & P. Falvey (Eds.), Research in speaking and writing assessment (pp. 316–377). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knoch, U., Macqueen, S., & O’Hagan, S.

(2014) An investigation of the effect of task type on the discourse produced by students at various score levels in the TOEFL iBT writing test. ETS Research Report, RR-14–43. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Krishnan, L. A., & Kathpalia, S. S.

(2002) Literature reviews in student project reports. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45(3), 187–197.

Lantolf, J. P.

(2003) Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the second language classroom. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 349–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L.

(2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D.

(2006) Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end, and there is no state. In Z. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 189–200). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

(2012) On the roles of repetition in language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 195–210.

(2019) On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 61–79.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.

(2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Laufer, B., & Waldman, T.

(2011) Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647–672.

Li, J., & Schmitt, N.

(2009) The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 85–102.

Macqueen, S.

(2012) The emergence of patterns in second language writing: A sociocognitive exploration of lexical trails. Bern: Peter Lang.

(2013) Emergence in second language writing: A methodological inroad. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13(2), 493–515.

McNamara, T.

(2019) Language and subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Neff van Aertselaer, J.

(2008) Contrasting English-Spanish interpersonal discourse phrases: A corpus study. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 85–99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nesselhauf, N.

(2005) Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ohlrogge, A.

(2009) Formulaic expressions in intermediate EFL writing assessment. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language: Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, and functional explanations (Vol. 2, pp. 375–386). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Paquot, M.

(2008) Exemplification in learner writing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 101–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Parker, I. M.

(2001) Safe site and seed limitation in Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom): Invasibility, disturbance, and the role of cryptogams in a glacial outwash prairie. Biological invasions, 3(4), 323–332.

Pawley, A., & Syder, F.

(1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). London: Longman.

Pecorari, D.

(2003) Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345.

Pennycook, A.

(1996) Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 201–230.

Petrić, B.

(2012) Legitimate textual borrowing: Direct quotation in L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 102–117.

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A.

(2013) Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 217–230.

Schmidt, R.

(1983) Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Sinclair, J.

(2004) Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.

Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & McClair, A.

(2013) Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section. Journal of English for academic purposes, 12(3), 214–225.

Stubbs, M.

(2001) Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Tomasello, M.

(2000) First steps towards a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1–2), 61–82.

Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E.

(2018) Bilingualism in the community: Code-switching and grammars in contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Lier, L.

(1996) Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.

Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X.

(2012) A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263.

Vygotsky, L. S.

(1962) Thought and language (E. H. G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

(1987) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K.

(2012) Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 118–133.

Wray, A.

(2000) Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463–489.

(2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R.

(2000) The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication, 20, 1–28.