This chapter examines L2 writing from a complex systems
perspective, viewing text construction as a process operating over multiple,
interconnected timescales and levels. Any attempt to capture the full
complexity of the system needs to be able to identify the different
components in play, the timescales and levels of social organization at
which they operate, the relationships between the components, and how the
components and their relationships change over time. We argue, similarly to
Dörnyei (2009), that mixed
methods research “suits the multi-level analysis of complex issues, because
it allows investigators to obtain data about both the individual and the
broader societal context” (p. 109) and discuss some of the affordances and
challenges of this approach with respect to L2 writing.
(2008) From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary research: A
case study. Qualitative Health Research, 18(4), 557–564.
Bazerman, C.
(1988) Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the
experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M.
(1987) The psychology of written composition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
Bryman, A.
(2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is
it done?Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Bryman, A.
(2007) Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative
research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 8–22.
Clift, R.
(2016) Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z.
(2009) The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feilzer, M. Y.
(2010) Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications
for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research
paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4, 6–16.
Fogal, G. G.
(2019) Tracking microgenetic changes in authorial voice
development from a complexity theory perspective. Applied Linguistics 40(3), 432–455.
Ganém-Gutiérrez, A.
(2008) Microgenesis, method and object: A study of collaborative
activity in a Spanish as a foreign language
classroom, Applied Linguistics 29(1), 120–148.
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Gilmore, A.
(2018a) Expert-novice interaction as the basis for L2
developmental activity: A SCT perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 5(1), 21–45.
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. & Gilmore, A.
(2018b) Tracking the real-time evolution of a writing event:
Second language writers at different proficiency
levels. Language Learning, 68(2), 469–506.
Gilmore, A.
(2007) Getting real in the language classroom: Developing
Japanese students’ communicative competence with authentic
materials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nottingham University, UK.
Gilmore, A.
(2011) “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’
communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786–819.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & Graham, W. F.
(1989) Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation
designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.
Hanlon, R. E., & Brown, J. W.
(1989) Microgenesis: Historical review and current
studies. In A. Ardila & F. Ostrosky-Solis (Eds.), Brain organization of language and cognitive processes (pp. 3–15). Dordrecht: Springer.
Johnson, K.
(1995) Understanding communication in second language
classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A.
(2007) Towards a definition of mixed methods
research. Journal of Mixed Methods, 1(2), 112–133.
Jones, R. H.
(2008) Good sex and bad karma: discourse and the historical
body. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 245–57). London: Routledge.
Kress, G.
(2010) Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary
communication. London: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J. & Murphy, L.
(2009) The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of
foreign language composing processes: Implications for
theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and
research (pp. 102–129). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Miller, K. S., Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P.
(2008) The psycholinguistic dimension in second language
writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer
keystroke logging. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 433–454.
Munro, A.
(2001, February19). Go ask Alice: Alice Munro interviewed by the New Yorker
fiction and poetry editor, Alice Quinn. The New Yorker, [URL]> (7January 2020).
Newman, I., & Benz, C. R.
(1998) Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the
interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Nishino, T., & Atkinson, D.
(2015) Second language writing as sociocognitive
alignment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 37–54.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J.
2003 Effect sizes in qualitative research: A
prolegomenonQuality & Quantity: International Journal of
Methodology 37 393 409
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L.
(2005) On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of
combining quantitative and qualitative research
methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387.
Scollon, R.
(2001) Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
(2004) Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.
Sieber, S. D.
(1973) The integration of fieldwork and survey
methods. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1335–1359.
Swain, M.
(2010) ‘Talking-it-through’: Languaging as a source of
learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language
learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A.
(2009) Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating
quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral
sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Trend, M. G.
(1978) ‘On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative
analyses: A case study’. Human Organization, 37(4), 345–354.
Willems, E. P., & Raush, H. L.
(1969) Naturalistic viewpoints in psychological
research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A. & Sloetjes, H.
(2006) ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality
research. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, A. Gagemi, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language
Resources and Evaluation (pp. 1556–1559). [URL]> (4January 2019).
Wong Scollon, S., & de Saint George, I.
(2012) Mediated discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 66–78). London: Routledge.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Fogal, Gary G.
2022. Second language writing from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Teaching 55:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Gánem-Gutiérrez, Gabriela Adela & Alexander Gilmore
2023. A mixed methods case study on the use and impact of web-based lexicographic tools on L2 writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:7 ► pp. 1365 ff.
Riazi, A. Mehdi & Mohammad Amini Farsani
2023. Mixed-methods research in applied linguistics: Charting the progress through the second decade of the twenty-first century. Language Teaching► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.