Chapter published in:
Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development
Edited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. 241270
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Ahearn, L. M.
(2001) Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. Crossref link
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.
(2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45, 5–35. Crossref link
Biesta, G.
(2010) Five theses on complexity reduction and its politics. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.), Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 5–13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Crossref link
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M.
(2007) Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39, 132–149. Crossref link
Byrne, D.
(2011) What is an effect? Coming at causality backwards. In M. Williams & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of innovation in research methods (pp. 80–94). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Crossref link
Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G.
(2014) Complexity theory and the social sciences. The state of the art. New York, NY: Routledge.
Byrnes, H.
(2002) The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437. Crossref link
(2012) Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A genre-based systemic functional linguistic approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 190–218). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Crossref link
(2014) Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 237–263). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2015) Linking ‘task’ and curricular thinking: An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp. 193–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2017) Toward a framework for U.S. collegiate foreign language instruction: Curricular considerations. In S. Coffey & U. Wingate (Eds.), New directions for research in foreign language education (pp. 200–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2018) Advanced-level grammatical development in instructed SLA. In P. A. Malovrh & A. G. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 133–156). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref link
(2019) Affirming the context of instructed SLA: The potential of curricular thinking. Language Teaching Research, 23, 514–532. Crossref link
(2020a) Developing an SFL-inspired 4-year collegiate foreign language program: Contexts, constructs, curriculum. In J. R. Martin, J. S. Knox, & D. Caldwell (Eds.), Developing theory: A handbook in appliable linguistics and semiotics. London: Bloomsbury.
(2020b) Toward an agenda for researching L2 writing and language learning: The educational context of development. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Byrnes, H., & Duff, P. A.
(2019) SLA across disciplinary borders: New perspectives, critical questions, and research possibilities Modern Language Journal, 103 (Supplement 2019), 3–174. Crossref link
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M.
(2014a) Task, task performance, and writing development: Advancing the constructs and the research agenda. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 267–299). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2014b) Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing: An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Byrnes, H., & Maxim, H., & Norris, J. M.
(2010) Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education. Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94, iv–vi, 1–235. Crossref link
Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grudnoff, L., & Aitken, G.
(2014) The challenge and promise of complexity theory for teacher education research. Teachers College Record, 116(050302), 1–38.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D.
(2006) Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
de Bot, K.
(2017) Complexity theory and dynamic systems theory: Same or different. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 51–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. & Verspoor, M.
(2013) Dynamic systems theory as a theory of second language development. In M. Garcia Mayo, M. Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Adrian (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21. Crossref link
Dörnyei, Z.
(2014) Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47, 80–91. Crossref link
Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & Muir, C.
(2016) Motivational currents in language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Douglas Fir Group
(2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 2016), 19–47. Crossref link
Ellis, N. C.
(2019) Essentials of a theory of language cognition. Modern Language Journal, 103 (Supplement 2019), 39–60. Crossref link
Emig, J.
(1977) Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122–128. Crossref link
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A.
(1998) What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023. Crossref link
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1991) Towards probabilistic interpretations. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 39–61). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
(1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. Crossref link
(1996) On grammar and grammatics. In R. Hasan, C. Cloran, & D. G. Butt (Eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory in practice (pp. 1–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1999) The notion of “context” in language education. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2002) Spoken and written modes of meaning. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar (pp. 323–351). London: Continuum.
(2007a) A language development approach to education (1994). In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and education (pp. 368–382). London: Continuum.
(2007b) The notion of “context” in language education (1991). In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and education (pp. 269–290). London: Continuum.
(2007c) On the concept of “educational linguistics” (1990). In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and education (pp. 354–367). London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.
(1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & revised by Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. New York, NY: Routledge. Crossref link
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2001) Individual cognitive/affective learner contributions and differential success in second language acquisition. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 12–24). Harlow, UK: Longman.
(2007) On the complementarity of chaos/complexity theory and dynamic systems theory in understanding the second language process. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 35–37. Crossref link
(2011) A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2015) Ten ‘lessons’ from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11–19). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
(2017) Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2019) On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. Modern Language Journal, 103(Supplement 2019), 61–79. Crossref link
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Tedick, D. J.
(2016) Teaching world languages: Thinking differently. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1335–1387). Washington, DC: AERA. Crossref link
Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T.
(2008) A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lemke, J. L., & Sabelli, N. H.
(2008) Complex systems and educational change: Towards a new research agenda. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 112–123). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref link
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2015) Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning, 65, 63–88. Crossref link
Manchón, R. M., & Matsuda, P. K.
(Eds.) (2016) Handbook of second and foreign language writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Crossref link
Martin, J. R.
(1991) Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics, 1, 99–162. Crossref link
(2009) Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21. Crossref link
Mason, M.
(Ed.) (2008) Complexity theory and the philosophy of education. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref link
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2015) Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics, 2(9), 1–48. Crossref link
Mick, C.
(2015) Sociological approaches to second language learning and agency. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 91–109). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Norris, J. M.
(2015) Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp. 27–57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2016) Language program evaluation. Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 2016), 169–189. Crossref link
Norris, J. M., & Manchón, R. M.
(2012) Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 219–245). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Crossref link
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. Crossref link
Ortega, L.
(2005) For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89, 427–443. Crossref link
Osberg, D., & Biesta, G.
(2010) Complexity theory and the politics of education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Crossref link
Overton, W. F.
(2007) A coherent metatheory for dynamic systems: Relational organicism-contextualism. Human Development, 50(2–3), 154–159. Crossref link
(2013) A new paradigm for developmental science: Relationism and relational-developmental systems. Applied Developmental Science, 17, 94–107. Crossref link
Peirce, C. S.
(1957) Essays in the philosophy of science. New York, NY: Liberal Arts Press.
Penris, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2017) Academic writing development: A complex dynamic process. In S. E. Pfenninger & J. Navracsics (Eds.), Future research directions for applied linguistics (pp. 215–242). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Crossref link
Ryshina-Pankova, M.
(2015) A meaning-based approach to the study of complexity in L2 writing: The case of grammatical metaphor. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 51–63. Crossref link
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H.
(2013) Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179–197. Crossref link
Slobin, D. I.
(1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M.
(2010) Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 532–553. Crossref link
Stenhouse, L.
(1975) An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Tardy, C. M.
(2011) The history and future of genre in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 1–5. Crossref link
Thompson, G.
(2001) Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22, 58–78. Crossref link
Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L. & Schönthal, D.
(Eds.) (2019) The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Tyler, A. E.
(2010) Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 270–291. Crossref link
Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L.
(2018) Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Tyler, A. E., Ortega, L., Uno, M., & Park, H. I.
(Eds.) (2018) Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H.
(2014) The good, the bad and the ugly? The dynamic interplay between educational practice, policy and research. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 11(2), 22–39. Crossref link
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., Chan, H. P., & Vahtrick, L.
(2017) Linguistic complexity in second language development: Variability and variation at advanced stages. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures. Les Cahiers de l’Acedle, 14(1), 1–27. Crossref link
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X.
(2012) A dynamic usage-based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 239–263. Crossref link
Verspoor, M., & Smiskova, H.
(2012) Foreign language writing development from a dynamic usage-based perspective. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 17–47). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Crossref link