Chapter published in:
Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development
Edited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. ixxviii
References
Bulté, B., & Housen, A.
(2014) Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26(1), 42–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 147–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2011) Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W. M., & Verspoor, M. H.
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2007) Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Wiliams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2009) Language as a complex adaptive system. Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fogal, G. G.
(2019) Tracking microgenetic changes in authorial voice development from a complexity theory perspective. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 432–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hou, J., Verspoor, M., & Loerts, H.
(2016) An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 65–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2017) Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 34(3), 321–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nitta, R., & Baba, K.
(2015) Self-regulation in the evolution of the ideal L2 self: A complex dynamic systems approach to the L2 motivational system. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 164–194). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2005) Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A.
(1987) Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2003) Task based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B.
(1994) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book of The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Geert, P.
(2008) The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92, 179–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H. J.
(2017) Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topics, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System, 66, 130–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar