Cover not available
Part of
Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development
Edited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. ix–xviii

Introduction

 | Sophia University
 | University of Groningen | University of Pannonia
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.int
References (19)
References
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26(1), 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 147–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W. M., & Verspoor, M. H. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Wiliams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fogal, G. G. (2019). Tracking microgenetic changes in authorial voice development from a complexity theory perspective. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 432–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hou, J., Verspoor, M., & Loerts, H. (2016). An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 65–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2017). Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 34(3), 321–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2015). Self-regulation in the evolution of the ideal L2 self: A complex dynamic systems approach to the L2 motivational system. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 164–194). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2003). Task based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book of The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92, 179–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H. J. (2017). Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topics, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System, 66, 130–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar