Chapter published in:
Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching: A collection of empirical studies
Edited by Wataru Suzuki and Neomy Storch
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 55] 2020
► pp. 130148
References

References

Brooks, L., & Swain, M.
(2009) Language in collaborative writing: Creation and response to expertise. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58–89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R.
(1989) Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13 (2), 145–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D.
(1983) Reformulating second-language compositions: A potential source of input for the learner (ERIC ED 228).Google Scholar
Cumming, A.
(1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7 (4), 482–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R.
(1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ferris, D.
(2010) Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32 (2), 181–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanaoka, O., & Izumi, S.
(2012) Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 332–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Tian, J.
(2010) Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14 (4), 397–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niu, R.
(2009) Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18 (3–4), 384–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pieson, H., Kumar, S., Lin, Z., & Neu, P.
(2007) New perspective graduate series reading, writing and rhetoric for the 21st Century (pp. 85–90). Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Storch, N.
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52 (1), 119–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31 , 275–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Crook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practices in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (3), 320–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion students’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37 (3-4), 285–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In B. Heidi (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L.
(2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (1), 5–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tocalli-Beller, A., & Swain, M.
(2005) Reformulation: The cognitive conflict and L2 learning it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15 (1), 5–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, W., & Wen, Q.
(2002) L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11 (3), 225–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M.
(2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11 (2), 121–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y.
(2008) Peer-peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64 (4), 605–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, K., & Mènard, N.
(1995) L1 and L2 writers’ strategic and linguistic knowledge: A model of multiple-level discourse processing. Language Learning, 45 (3), 381–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L., & Zhang, L.
(2010) Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research, 14 (4), 141–160.Google Scholar
Yang, L., & Gao, S.
(2013) Beliefs and practices of Chinese university teachers in EFL writing instruction. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26 (2), 128–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar