Chapter published in:
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 95118
References

References

Adrada-Rafael, S., & Filgueras-Gómez, M.
(2019) Reactivity, language of think aloud protocol, and depth of processing in the processing of reformulated feedback. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 201–213). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aghajanloo, K., Mobini, F., & Khosravi, R.
(2016) The effect of teachers’ written corrective feedback (WCF) types on intermediate EFL learners’ writing performance. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7, 28–37.Google Scholar
Ashwell, T.
(2000) Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R.
(2019) Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 702–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J.
(2008) Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) To what extent has the published written CF research aided our understanding of its potential for L2 development? ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167, 111–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D.
(2012) Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U.
(2008) The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31, 193–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Storch, N.
(2016) Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruton, A.
(2009) Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 136–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caras, A.
(2019) Written corrective feedback in compositions and the role of depth of processing. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 188–200). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, L., Manchón, R. M., & Nicolás-Conesa, F.
(2019) What do learners notice while processing written corrective feedback? A look at depth of processing via written languaging. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 173–187). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J.
(2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of second language writing, 12(3), 267–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, Y., Cánovas-Guirao, J., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2018) Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A.
(1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M.
(2015) Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 94–112). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2009) A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT journal, 63, 97–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H.
(2008) The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fathman, A., & Whalley, E.
(1990) Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178–190). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R.
(1999) The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B.
(2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M.
(2013) Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A.
(2013) An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(2017) L2 instructor individual characteristics. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 451–467). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harklau, L.
(2002) The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(2006) Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karimi, S. H.
(2016) Effects of different types of teacher written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(2), 216–229.Google Scholar
Kassim, A., & Ng, L. L.
(2014) Investigating the efficacy of focused and unfocused corrective feedback on the accurate use of prepositions in written work. English Language Teaching, 7, 119–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kepner, C. G.
(1991) An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 7, 305–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lalande, J. F.
(1982) Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, J.
(2007) Feedback in L2 learning: Responding to errors during practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practicing in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 111–137). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P.
(1999) The role of attention in second/foreign language classroom research: Methodological issues. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic Linguistics: Papers from the 2nd. Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 60–71). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Explicit and implicit learning in the L2 classroom: What does the research suggest? The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 2, 117–129.Google Scholar
(2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019a) ISLA: How implicit or how explicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research, 23, 476–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019b) From SLA > ISLA > ILL: A curricular perspective. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 485–493). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., & Cerezo, L.
(2016) Deconstructing the “I” and “SLA” in ISLA: One curricular approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 43–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., & Martín, A.
(2017) Enhancing the input to promote salience of the L2: A critical overview. In S. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (Eds.) Salience in SLA (pp. 167–186). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S.
(2017) Cognitive differences and ISLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 396–417). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
López, M. B., Van Steendam, E., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K.
(2018) The differential effects of comprehensive feedback forms in the second language writing class: Comprehensive feedback in the L2 writing class. Language Learning, 68, 813–850. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(2009) Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011a) The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: Lessons from research. In T. Cimasko & M. Reichelt (Eds.), Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices (pp. 44–64). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2011b) Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011c) Situating the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 3–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Nicolás-Conesa, F., Cerezo, L. & Criado, R.
(2020) L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback: Depth of processing via written languaging. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching (pp. 241–265). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2007) Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E. A. Soler & M. P. S. Jordá (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–121). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J. & Murphy, L.
(2009) The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing: Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–129). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O.
(2019) Language learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In J. B. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of language learning (pp. 341–362). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J.
(2016) L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2011) Reflections on the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of second language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 237–250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, E. S., & Kim, O. Y.
(2019) Learners’ use of indirect written corrective feedback: Depth of processing and self-correction. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 214–228). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polio, C.
(2012) The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polio, C., & Lee, J.
(2017) Written language learning. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 299–317). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I.
(1986) Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Coyle, Y., & Nicolás-Conesa, F.
(2016) Focus on writers: Processes and strategies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 267–286). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Murphy, L., Manchón, R. M., & Marín, J.
(2008) The foreign language writer’s strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 30–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semke, H. D.
(1984) Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2007) The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, R. P., Daily O’Meara, K., Snyder, S. E.
(2016) Grammar agreements: Crafting a more finely tuned approach to corrective feedback. Journal of Response to Writing, 2(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R.
(2013) The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 286–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W.
(2014) Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ understanding and use of two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64(1),103–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanou, C., & Revesz, A.
(2015) Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. Modern Language Journal, 99, 263–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(2010) Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 29–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G.
(2010) Learners’ processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, W.
(2012) Written languaging, direct correction, and second language writing revision. Language Learning, 62, 1110–1133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) The effect of quality of written languaging on second language learning. Writing & Pedagogy, 8, 461–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, W. & N. Storch
(Eds.) (2020) Languaging in language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(2005) The Output Hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J.
(1996) The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.
(2008) Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Beuningen, C. G.
(2010) Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F.
(2008) The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62, 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, T., & Jiang, L.
(2015) Studies on written corrective feedback: Theoretical perspectives, empirical evidence, and future directions. English Language Teaching, 8, 110–120.Google Scholar
Xu, C.
(2009) Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 270–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar