Chapter 13
Writing on history in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) context
Development of grammatical metaphor and abstraction as evidence of language learning
In this chapter we attempt to answer Manchón and Williams’ (2016, p. 580) question as to “how language and writing develop in content-based instruction and CLIL
programs” as a key concern in the study of writing as a site for language learning. Our longitudinal study from a CLIL
context traces students’ development in writing in English by analyzing a key feature of disciplinary literacy,
grammatical metaphor (GM), created through nominalizations and abstract nouns. Data for this study consists of 64
texts by the same 16 students, on a topic from the history syllabus, collected yearly over the four years of
obligatory secondary education. In the data we identified and analyzed just under 1,500 instances of GM. Results
showed a significantly higher use and greater accuracy of GM in second cycle texts. Given the role of writing in
learning subject discourses, the chapter closes by reflecting on the implications of these findings for practice and
for research directions for writing in CLIL contexts.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Writing in CLIL classes and academic language development
- The role of grammatical metaphor (GM) in meaning-making in history writing
- The development of grammatical metaphor
- The study
- Method
- Context, participants, and data collection procedures
- Data analysis procedures
- Results
- Discussion: Expanding meaning-making resources through writing on history
- Conclusions and pedagogical implications for writing in CLIL classes
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (68)
Beacco, J.-C.
(
2010)
Items
for a description of linguistic competence in the language of schooling necessary for learning/teaching
history (end of obligatory education). An approach with reference
points. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
[URL]> (
26 May 2020).
Beacco, J.-C.
(
2017)
Language
in all subjects: The Council of Europe’s perspective.
EuJAL
5, 157–176.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Byrnes, H.
(
2006)
What
kind of resource is language and why does it matter for advanced language learning. An
introduction. In
H. Byrnes (Ed.),
Advanced
language learning: The contribution of Halliday and
Vygotsky (pp. 1–8). London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Byrnes, H.
(
2009)
Emergent
L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical
metaphor.
Linguistics and
Education, 20, 50–66.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christie, F.
(
2002)
The
development of abstraction in adolescence in subject
English. In
M. Schleppegrell &
C. Colombi (Eds.),
Developing
advanced literacy in first and second
languages (pp. 45–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christie, F.
(
2012)
Language
education throughout the school years: A functional
perspective. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B.
(
2008)
School
discourse. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coffin, C.
(
2006)
Historical
discourse: The language of time, cause and
evaluation. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Colombi, M. C.
(
2009)
A
systemic functional approach to teaching Spanish for heritage speakers in the United
States.
Linguistics and
Education, 20, 39–49.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coetzee-Lachmann, D.
(
2007)
Assessment
of subject-specific task performance of bilingual geography learners: Analysing aspects of subject-specific
written discourse (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Osnabrück University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Graff, R., Koopman, G. J., & Westhoff, G.
(
2007)
Identifying
effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning
(CLIL).
Viewz 16(3), 12–19.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Oliveira, L. C.
(
2011)
Knowing
and wrting school history: The language of students’ expository writing and teacher
expectations. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Oliveira, L. C., & Lan, S.-W.
(
2014)
Writing
science in an upper elementary classroom: A genre-based approach to teaching English language
learners.
Journal of Second Language
Writing, 25, 23–39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eggins, S., Martin, J. R., & Wignell, P.
(
1993)
The
discourse of history: Distancing the recoverable
past. In
M. Ghadessy (Ed.),
Register
analysis: Theory and
practice (pp. 75–109). London: Pinter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
European
Commission/EACEA/Eurydice
(
2017)
Key data on teaching languages
at school in Europe: 2017 edition. Eurydice
Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fontaine, L.
(
2017)
Fluid
boundaries and the categorization of nominal
expressions. In
S. Neumann,
R. Wegener,
J. Fest,
P. Niemietz and
N. Hützen (Eds.),
Challenging
boundaries in linguistics: Systemic functional
perspectives (pp. 19–38). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gené-Gil, M., Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J.
(
2015)
Development
of EFL writing over three years in secondary education: CLIL and non-CLIL
settings.
Language Learning
Journal, 43(3), 286–303.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentil, G.
(
2011)
A
biliteracy agenda for genre research.
Journal of Second Language
Writing, 20(1), 6–23.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K.
(
1993)
Towards
a language-based theory of learning.
Linguistics and
Education, 5(2), 93–116.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C.
(
2014)
Halliday’s
introduction to functional
grammar. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harman, R.
(
2013)
Literary
intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2
writing.
Journal of Second Language
Writing, 22, 125–140.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, L.
(
2010)
Problem
solving in a foreign language: A study in content and language integrated
learning. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Humphrey, S., & Macnaught, L.
(
2016)
Functional
language instruction and the writing growth of English language learners in the middle
years.
TESOL
Quarterly, 50(4), 792–816.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jexenflicker, S., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
Lasagabaster, D.
(
2008)
Foreign
language competence in content and language integrated courses.
The Open
Applied Linguistics
Journal, 1, 30–41.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasagabaster, D.
(
2011)
English
achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings.
Innovation in
Language Learning and
Teaching, 5(1), 3–18.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liardét, C. L.
(
2013)
An
exploration of Chinese EFL learner’s deployment of grammatical metaphor: Learning to make academically valued
meanings.
Journal of Second Language
Writing, 22, 164–178.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liardét, C. L.
(
2015)
Academic
literacy and grammatical metaphor: Mapping development.
TESOL International
Journal, 10(1), 29–46.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liardét, C. L.
(
2016)
Grammatical
metaphor: Distinguishing success.
Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 22, 109–118.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Llinares, A., & Whittaker, R.
(
2010)
Writing
and speaking in a history class: A comparative analysis of CLIL and first language
contexts. In
C. Dalton-Puffer,
T. Nikula, &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Language
use and language learning in CLIL
classrooms (pp. 125–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenzo, F.
(
2016)
Historical
literacy in bilingual settings: Cognitive academic language in CLIL history
narratives.
Linguistics and
Education, 37, 32–41.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenzo, F., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
(
2016)
Historical
literacy in CLIL: Telling the past in a second
language. In
T. Nikula,
E. Dafouz,
P. Moore, &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Conceptualising
integration in CLIL and multilingual
education (pp. 55–72). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenzo, F., & Rodríguez, L.
(
2014)
Onset
and expansion of L2 cognitive academic language proficiency in bilingual settings: CALP in
CLIL.
System, 47, 64–72.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J.
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J.
(
2016)
L2
writing and SLA studies. In
R. M. Manchón &
P. K. Matsuda (Eds.),
Handbook
of second and foreign language
writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J. R., & White, P.
(
2005)
The
language of evaluation: Appraisal in
English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maton, K.
(
2013)
Making
semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building.
Linguistics and
Education, 24(1), 8–22.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCabe, A., & Whittaker, R.
Meyer, O., & Coyle, D.
(
2017)
Pluriliteracies
teaching for learning: Conceptualizing progression for deeper learning in literacies
development.
EuJAL, 5, 199–222.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mohan, B., & Beckett, G. H.
(
2001)
A
functional approach to research on content-based language learning: Recasts in causal
explanations.
Canadian Modern Language
Review, 58, 133–155.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Navés, T.
(
2011)
How
promising are the results of integrating content and langage for EFL writing and overall EFL
proficiency. In
Y. Ruiz de Zarobe,
J. M. Sierra, &
F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.),
Content
and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European
contexts (pp. 155–186). Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Painter, C., Derewianka, B., & Torr, J.
(
2005)
From
microfunction to metaphor: learning language and learning through
language. In
R. Hasan,
C. Matthiessen, &
J. Webster (Eds.),
Continuing
discourse on language: A functional
perspective, Vol. II (pp. 563–588). London: Equinox.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polio, C., & Park, J. H.
(
2016)
Language
development in second language writing. In
R. M. Manchón &
P. K. Matsuda (Eds.),
Handbook
of second and foreign language
writing (pp. 287–306). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roquet, H., & Pérez-Vidal, C.
(
2016)
Do
productive skills improve in content and language integrated contexts? The case of
writing.
Applied
Linguistics, 38(4), 1–24.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rose, D.
(
2010)
Reading
to learn: Implementation and outcomes of the professional development program. Report
for the Western NSW Region. NSW Department of Education and Training.
NSW, Australia.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
(
2012)
Learning
to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney
School. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ryshina-Pankova, M.
(
2015)
A
meaning-based approach to the study of complexity in L2 writing: The case of grammatical
metaphor.
Journal of Second Language
Writing, 29, 51–63.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H.
(
2013)
Writing
as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German
compositions.
Journal of Second Language
Writing, 22(2), 179–197.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(
2004)
The
language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(
2011)
Supporting
disciplinary learning through language analysis: developing historical
literacy. In
F. Christie &
K. Maton (Eds.),
Disciplinarity:
Functional linguistic and sociological
perspectives (pp. 197–216). London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M., & Otéiza, T.
(
2004)
The
grammar of history: enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on
language.
TESOL
Quarterly, 38(1), 67–93.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, H. J.
(
2000)
English
abstract nouns as conceptual shells. From corpus to
cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veel, R., & Coffin, C.
(
1996)
Learning
to think like an historian: the language of secondary school
history. In
R. Hasan &
G. Williams (Eds.),
Literacy
in
society (pp. 191–231). London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whittaker, R., & Acevedo, C.
(
2016)
Working
on literacy in CLIL/bilingual contexts: Reading to Learn and teacher
development.
Estudios sobre
Educacion, 31, 37–55.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A.
(
2009)
CLIL
in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written
productions. In
Y. Ruiz de Zarobe &
R. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.),
Content
and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in
Europe (pp. 215–234). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A.
(
2011)
Functions
of language in CLIL secondary classes: A systemic functional
approach. In
C. Escobar &
L. Nussbaum (Eds.),
Aprendre
en una altra llengua, Learning through another language, Aprender en otra
lengua (pp. 141–161). Barcelona: U.A.B.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A.
(
2011)
Written
discourse development in CLIL at secondary school.
Language Teaching
Research, 15(3), 343–362.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, J.
(
2012)
The
potential role(s) of writing in second language development.
Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 21, 321–331.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weissberg, R.
(
2006)
Connecting
speaking and writing in second language writing instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H.-Y.
(
1998)
Second
language development in writing: measures of fluency, accuracy and
complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Coyle, Yvette & Julio Roca de Larios
2024.
Exploring Children's L2 Disciplinary Literacy Through a Multimodal Science Project in a CLIL Context.
TESOL Quarterly 58:2
► pp. 628 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Llinares, Ana & Tarja Nikula
2024.
CLIL students’ production of cognitive discourse functions: Comparing Finnish and Spanish contexts.
Language and Education 38:3
► pp. 381 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Roca de Larios, Julio, Yvette Coyle & Vanessa García
2022.
The effects of using cognitive discourse functions to instruct 4th-year children on report writing in a CLIL science class.
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 12:4
► pp. 597 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.