Chapter published in:Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 309–332
Writing on history in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) context
Development of grammatical metaphor and abstraction as evidence of language learning
In this chapter we attempt to answer Manchón and Williams’ (2016, p. 580) question as to “how language and writing develop in content-based instruction and CLIL programs” as a key concern in the study of writing as a site for language learning. Our longitudinal study from a CLIL context traces students’ development in writing in English by analyzing a key feature of disciplinary literacy, grammatical metaphor (GM), created through nominalizations and abstract nouns. Data for this study consists of 64 texts by the same 16 students, on a topic from the history syllabus, collected yearly over the four years of obligatory secondary education. In the data we identified and analyzed just under 1,500 instances of GM. Results showed a significantly higher use and greater accuracy of GM in second cycle texts. Given the role of writing in learning subject discourses, the chapter closes by reflecting on the implications of these findings for practice and for research directions for writing in CLIL contexts.
Published online: 20 November 2020
(2010) Items for a description of linguistic competence in the language of schooling necessary for learning/teaching history (end of obligatory education). An approach with reference points. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/platform-plurilingual-intercultural-language-education/language-s-in-other-subjects> (26 May 2020).
Colombi, M. C.
De Graff, R., Koopman, G. J., & Westhoff, G.
De Oliveira, L. C.
De Oliveira, L. C., & Lan, S.-W.
Eggins, S., Martin, J. R., & Wignell, P.
Gené-Gil, M., Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J.
Halliday, M. A. K.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C.
Humphrey, S., & Macnaught, L.
Järvinen, H. M.
Jexenflicker, S., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
Liardét, C. L.
Llinares, A., & Whittaker, R.
Lorenzo, F., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
Lorenzo, F., & Moore, P.
Lorenzo, F., & Rodríguez, L.
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J.
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J.
Martin, J. R., & White, P.
McCabe, A., & Whittaker, R.
Meyer, O., & Coyle, D.
Mohan, B., & Beckett, G. H.
(2011) How promising are the results of integrating content and langage for EFL writing and overall EFL proficiency. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, & F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts (pp. 155–186). Bern: Peter Lang.
Painter, C., Derewianka, B., & Torr, J.
Polio, C., & Park, J. H.
Roquet, H., & Pérez-Vidal, C.
(2010) Reading to learn: Implementation and outcomes of the professional development program. Report for the Western NSW Region. NSW Department of Education and Training. NSW, Australia.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y.
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H.
Schleppegrell, M. J.
Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M., & Otéiza, T.
Schmid, H. J.
Veel, R., & Coffin, C.
Whittaker, R., & Acevedo, C.
Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A.
Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A.