Chapter 4
Do task repetition and pretask focus on form instruction impact
collaborative writing performance?
Evidence from young learners
This study examines the influence of task
repetition (TR) and pretask focus on form instruction (FFI) on
written collaborative production. Eighty-five low-proficiency EFL
children carried out a dictogloss task twice: one targeting the 3rd
person singular present “‑s”, and the other aiming at the possessive
determiners “his/her”. Participants were divided into three
different conditions: individual, collaborative, and pretask
FFI + collaborative. Their written output was analyzed for
complexity and accuracy, and overall text quality was gauged with an
analytic rubric. The results did not reveal an advantage for the
collaborative groups over the individuals. However, TR and
collaboration increased grammatical accuracy while pretask FFI
appeared to foster more accurate use of the target forms.
Pedagogical and research implications are discussed.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Collaborative vs individual L2 writing
- Task repetition
- Pretask focus on form instruction
- Methods
- Materials
- The DG texts
- The pretask FFI
- Procedure
- Analysis
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (89)
References
Agustín Llach, M. P. (2011). Lexical
errors and accuracy in foreign language
writing. Multilingual Matters.
Amiryousefi, M. (2016). The
differential effects of two types of task repetition on the
complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2
written production: A focus on computer
anxiety. Computer Assisted
Language
Learning, 29(5), 1052–1068.
Berthele, R., & Udry, I. (Eds.). (2021). Individual
differences in early instructed language
learning. Language Science Press.
Butler, Y. G. (2016). 22.
Assessing young
learners. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
assessment. De Gruyter.
Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2021a). Child
learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative
writing task: When form is not at odds with
communication. Language
Awareness, 30(1), 1–16.
Cambridge Assessment
English. (2018). Young
learners sample papers 2018–Flyers
A2. Cambridge Assessment English. Retrieved on 27 March
2023 from [URL]
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating
ESL reading by teaching text
structure. TESOL
Quarterly, 19(4), 727–752.
Chen, W. (2021). Understanding
students’ motivation in L2 collaborative
writing. ELT
Journal, 75(4), 442–450.
Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). A
longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes,
participation, and learning in collaborative
writing. System, 82, 83–96.
Council of
Europe. (2018). Common
European framework of reference for languages: learning,
teaching, assessment: Companion volume with new
descriptors. Council of Europe. Retrieved on 27 March
2023 from [URL]
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill
acquisition
theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories
in second language acquisition. An
introduction (pp. 94–112). Routledge.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective
scaffolding in second language
learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygostkian
approaches to second language
research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural
sequences in child second language
acquisition. Language
Learning, 24(1), 37–53.
Eckerth, J. (2008). Investigating
consciousness-raising tasks: Pedagogically targeted and
non-targeted learning
gains. International Journal
of Applied
Linguistics, 18(2), 119–145.
Elabdali, R. (2021). Are
two heads really better than one? A meta-analysis of the L2
learning benefits of collaborative
writing. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 52, 100788.
Ellis, N. C. (2004). The
processes of second language
acquisition. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning
connections in second language
acquisition (pp. 49–76). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ellis, N. (2006). Selective
attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition:
Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference,
overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual
learning. Applied
Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based
language teaching: Theory and
practice. Cambridge University Press.
Enever, J., & Driscoll, P. (2019). Introduction. AILA
Review, 32, 1–9.
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative
writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair,
and individual work. Journal
of Second Language
Writing, 21(1), 40–58.
Fernández, M.-J., Montanero, M., & Lucero, M. (2019). La
evaluación de la competencia narrativa en la educación
básica. Revista de
Educación, 383, 85–110.
García Mayo, M. P. (Ed.). (2021). Working
collaboratively in second/foreign language
learning. De Gruyter.
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2019). Task
modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns
of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school
children. System, 80, 165–175.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Álvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The
effects of task repetition on linguistic
output. Language
Learning, 49, 549–581.
Guiraud, P. (1959). Problèmes
et méthodes de la statistique
linguistique. Reidel.
Horst, M., White, J., & Bell, P. (2010). First
and second language knowledge in the language
classroom. International
Journal of
Bilingualism, 14(3), 331–349.
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Complexity,
accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurement and
research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions
of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and
fluency in
SLA (pp. 1–20). John Benjamins.
Huang, T., Steinkrauss, R., & Verspoor, M. (2021). Variability
as predictor in L2 writing
proficiency. Journal of
Second Language
Writing, 52. 100787.
Hunt, K. W. (1965). A
synopsis of clause-to-sentence length
factors. The English
Journal, 54(4), 300–309.
JASP
Team. (2019). JASP (Version
0.11.1)[Computer
software]. [URL]
Khezrlou, S. (2021). Effects
of timing and availability of isolated FFI on learners’
written accuracy and fluency through task
repetition. The Language
Learning Journal. 49(5), 568–580.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The
effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative
dialogue between Korean as a second language
learners. Language Teaching
Research, 12(2), 211–234.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using
pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning
opportunities. Language
Teaching
Research, 15(2), 183–199.
Kim, Y., Kang, S., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, B. (2020). The
role of task repetition in a Korean as a foreign language
classroom: Writing quality, attention to form, and learning
of Korean grammar. Foreign
Language
Annals, 53(4), 827–849.
Kopinska, M., & Azkarai, A. (2020). Exploring
young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual versus pair work
on dictogloss tasks. Studies
in Second Language Learning and
Teaching, 10(3), 607–630.
Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner
proficiency and focus on form during collaborative
dialogue. Language Teaching
Research, 8(1), 55–81.
Lim, J. (2019). An
investigation of the text features of discrepantly-scored
ESL essays: A mixed methods
study. Assessing
Writing, 39, 1–13.
Long, M. (1996). The
role of the linguistic environment in second language
acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
acquisition (pp. 121–158). Academic Press.
Long, M. (2015). Second
language acquisition and task-based language
teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.
Manchón, R. M. (2014). The
distinctive nature of task repetition in writing.
Implications for theory, research, and
pedagogy. Elia, 14(13), 13–41.
McKay, P. (2006). Assessing
young language
learners. Cambridge University Press.
Michel, M. (2017). Complexity,
accuracy, and fluency in L2
production. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of instructed second language
acquisition (pp. 50–68). Routledge.
Michel, M., Révész, A., Lu, X., Kourtali, N.-E., Lee, M., & Borges, L. (2020). Investigating
L2 writing processes across independent and integrated
tasks: A mixed-methods
study. Second Language
Research, 36(3), 307–334.
Murakami, A., & Ellis, N. C. (2022). Effects
of availability, contingency, and formulaicity on the
accuracy of English grammatical morphemes in second language
writing. Language
Learning, 1–42.
Patanasorn, C. (2010). Effects
of procedural content and task repetition on accuracy and
fluency in an EFL
context. Northern Arizona University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Pica, T. (1983). Methods
of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the
interpretation of second language
data. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 6(1), 69–78.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How
big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research:
Effect sizes in L2
research. Language
Learning, 64(4), 878–912.
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2018). Metacognitive
instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective
feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic
targets: Metacognitive instruction and corrective
feedback. Language
Learning, 68(2), 507–545.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The
role of consciousness in second language
learning. Applied
Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
Schmidt, R. W. (2010). Attention,
awareness, and individual differences in language
learning. In W. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J. W. Sew, T. Suthiwan, & I. Walker (Eds.), Proceedings
of CLaSIC
2010 (pp. 721–737). National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects
and student perceptions of collaborative writing in
L2. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 29(4), 286–305.
Shin, J. K., & Crandall, J. (Jodi). (2018). Teaching
reading and writing to young
learners. In S. Garton & F. Copland (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of teaching English to young
learners (pp. 188–202). Routledge.
Shin, S.-Y., Lidster, R., Sabraw, S., & Yeager, R. (2016). The
effects of L2 proficiency differences in pairs on idea units
in a collaborative text reconstruction
task. Language Teaching
Research, 20(3), 366–386.
Shintani, N., Aubrey, S., & Donnellan, M. (2016). The
effects of pre-task and post-task metalinguistic
explanations on accuracy in second language
writing. TESOL
Quarterly, 50(4), 945–955.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative
writing in L2
classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
Storch, N. (2016). Collaborative
writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook
of second and foreign language
writing (pp. 387–406). De Gruyter.
Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative
writing. Language
Teaching, 52(01), 40–59.
Storch, N. (2021). Collaborative
writing: Promoting languaging among language
learners. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Working
collaboratively in second/foreign language
learning (pp. 13–34). De Gruyter.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus
on form through conscious
reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus
on form in classroom second language
acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M. (2000). The
Output Hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through
collaborative
dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural
theory and second language
learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging,
agency and collaboration in advanced second language
proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced
language learning: The contribution of Halliday and
Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction
and second language learning: Two adolescent French
immersion students working
together. The Modern Language
Journal, 82(3), 320–337.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus
on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task
effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching
pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and
testing (pp. 99–118). Pearson Education.
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Raising
children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom
second language
learning. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning
foreign languages in primary school: Research
insights (pp. 22–48). Multilingual Matters.
Torras, M. R., Navés, T., Celaya, M. L., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2006). Age
and IL development in
writing. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age
and rate of foreign language
learning (pp. 156–182). Multilingual Matters.
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input
and output in establishing form-meaning
connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning
connections in second language
acquisition (pp. 29–47). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Villarreal, I., & Gil-Sarratea, N. (2019). The
effect of collaborative writing in an EFL secondary
setting. Language Teaching
Research, 24(6) 874–897.
Villarreal, I., & Munarriz-Ibarrola, M. (2021). “Together
we do better”: The effect of pair and group work on young
EFL learners’ written texts and
attitudes. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Working
collaboratively in second/foreign language
learning (pp. 89–115). De Gruyter.
Vyatkina, N. (2012). The
development of second language writing complexity in groups
and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus
study. The Modern Language
Journal, 96(4), 576–598.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind
in society: The development of higher psychological
processes. Harvard University Press.
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar
dictation. Oxford University Press.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair
versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity
and accuracy. Language
Testing, 26(3), 445–466.
Wigglesworth, G. & Storch, N. (2013). What
role for collaboration and writing and writing
feedback. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 21(4), 364–374.
Yang, Y., Sun, Y., Chang, P., & Li, Y. (2019). Exploring
the relationship between language aptitude, vocabulary size,
and EFL graduate students’ L2 writing
performance. TESOL
Quarterly, 53(3), 845–856.
Zalbidea, J. (2021). On
the scope of output in SLA: Task modality, salience, L2
grammar noticing, and
development. Studies in
Second Language
Acquisition, 43(1), 50–82.
Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Collaborative
writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and
methodological
review. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 49. 100753.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Mayo, María del Pilar García & María Luquin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.