Articles / Articulos / Aufsätze / Artikoloj
The relevance of motility in language shift research
Motility (sometimes referred to as ‘mobility capital’ or ‘mobility potential’) is
a still understudied and underutilised concept in both migration and
sociolinguistic literature. Perhaps even more than actual mobility, it can shed
an important light on the possible connection between language and migration. In
this theoretical article, it will be argued that motility can both be a
potential catalyst for language shift, but can in other instances also
contribute to language maintenance. Inspired by Fishman’s Graded
Intergenerational Disruption Scale (GIDS) and Simon and Lewis’ Expanded Graded
Intergenerational Scale (EGIDS), it is assumed that the most important factor in
processes of language shift is the attitude of parents, in particular their
willingness to transmit their heritage language to their children. This
willingness is connected with the perception of the value of the heritage
language, which might be, in addition to other factors, influenced by the
mobility capital the heritage language might give future generations. The
interplay between migrant networks in different countries and the country of
origin is key in understanding the parents’ decision-making process.
Furthermore, the three main features of motility (access, competence and
appropriation) fit quite logically in the already existing EGIDS scale. This
article thus argues that motility is a valuable and necessary concept for
sociolinguistic research and migration scholars alike.
Article outline
- Motility
- The (E)GIDS scale and motility
- Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (23)
References
Arends‐Tóth, J., & Van De Vijver, F. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish – Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(2), 249–266. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourdieu, P. (1977). L’économie des echanges linguistiques. Langue Française. 341, 17–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Castles, S., & Miller, M. (2009). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Çelik, Ç. (2015). ‘Having a German passport will not make me German’: Reactive ethnicity and oppositional identity among disadvantaged male Turkish second-generation youth in Germany. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(9), 1646–1662. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Swaan, A. (2001). Worlds of the world: The global language system. Malden: Polity Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Vroome, T., Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2014). Host national identification of immigrants in the Netherlands. International Migration Review, 48(1), 76–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fishman, J. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gobbo, F. (2015). Transnational communication in a ‘glocalized’ world: In search of balanced multilingualism. In I. Koutny (Ed.), Language Communication Information (Special issue on Interlinguistic and Esperanto Studies), 196–208.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, J., Roberts, M., & Verivaki, M. (1993). Language maintenance and shift in three New Zealand speech communities. Applied linguistics, 14(1), 1–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Houtkamp, C. (2014). Integrating language in theories on long-distance movement: Migration vs mobility and the concept of motility. A’dam Multiling, 1(1), 16–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 745–756. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, P. & Simon, G. (2010). Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Romanian Review of Linguistics, 55(2), 103–120.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Massey, D., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouanouci, A., Pellegrimo, A., & Taylor, E. (2008). Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milroy, L. (2002). Introduction: Mobility, contact and language change – Working with contemporary speech communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 61, 3–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Putnam, R. (2007).
E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sonntag, S. & Cardinal, L. (Eds.) (2015). State traditions and language regimes. Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stahl, C. (1993). Explaining international migration. In C. Stahl, R. Ball, C. Inglis, & P. Gutman. (Eds.), Global Population Movements and their Implications for Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stoessel, S. (2002). Investigating the role of social networks in language maintenance and shift. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1531, 93–131.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turkenburg, M. (2001). Onderwijs in allochtone levende talen: Een verkenning in zeven gemeenten. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR) (1989). Allochtonenbeleid. SDU; ’s-Gravenhage![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Website Volkskrant (last visited: 1–12–2016) [URL]
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Joshi, Saakshi & Ajay Bailey
2023.
What happens next? Exploring women's transport motility through the story completion method.
Journal of Transport Geography 107
► pp. 103547 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Gobbo, Federico & László Marácz
2021.
Two Linguas Francas? Social Inclusion through English and Esperanto.
Social Inclusion 9:1
► pp. 75 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.