Cover not available
Discussion published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 43:3 (2019) ► pp.312–317
Debate / Debate / Debatte / Debato

“Rejoinder” to Robert Phillipson, Languages in public policy, and constraints in academia

| CEPII, CREST, CEPR, Heriot-Watt University
Article outline
  • Consider first the scientific world
  • Consider next world trade
  • References
Published online: 3 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00047.mel
References
British Chambers of Commerce
(2003–2004) The BBC Language Survey. The Impact of Foreign Languages on British Business – Part 11 2003; Part 21 2004 (online, Web publication).Google Scholar
Dearing, R.
(2006) ‘The Dearing Report to the Secretary of State for Education & Skills’, The Languages Review, [URL]
Feely, A. & Winslow, D.
(2005) Talking sense. A Research Study of Language Skills Management in Major Companies (London: CILT, The National Center for Languages).Google Scholar
Graddol, D.
(1997) The Future of English (London: British Council).Google Scholar
Mélitz, J.
(2016) “English as a global language” in V. Ginsburgh and S. Weber, eds., The Palgrave handbook of economics and language,” Chapter 20 (pp.583–615) Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nuffield Foundation
(2000) Languages: the next generation; the final report and recom-mendations of the Nuffield Languages Inquiry (online).Google Scholar
Varis, T.
(1984) ‘The international flow of television programs’, Journal of Communication, 341, pp. 143–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar