Linguistic territoriality under stress
European perspectives
This article revisits a well-known dichotomy (the ‘territorial’ and ‘personal’ principles) and develops a
four-element classification of state approaches (from the most generous to the most menacing, from the perspective of speakers of
minority languages). The article examines the implications for language policy of geographically dispersed or spatially
concentrated patterns of distribution of speakers of particular languages. We begin by exploring the general literature on
language policy, focusing in particular on the territorial and personal principles, the use of ‘threshold rules’ at municipal and
other subnational levels, and the hybrid language regimes that are often a consequence of sociolinguistic complexity. We consider
the extent to which responses to linguistic diversity across Europe may be understood by reference to these principles and
categories. We explain why we have selected particular case studies (the Baltic republics, Transylvania, Switzerland, Belgium and
Ireland) for further exploration. We conclude that, notwithstanding the value of the typologies we consider, real-life cases are
almost invariably more complex, with states implementing policies that defy categorisation, that may change over time, and that
may treat different language minorities by reference to different principles.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The debate
- 3.The options
- 4.The case studies
- 5.Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (68)
References
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public
goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284. 

Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal
of Economic
Growth, 8(2), 155–194. 

Aparicio Fenoll, A., & Kuehn, Z. (2016). Does
foreign language proficiency foster migration of young individuals within the European
Union? In: M. Gazzola and B.-A. Wickström (Eds.), The
economics of language
policy (pp. 331–355). Cambridge (MA)/London: MIT Press. 

Arcand, J.-L., & Grin, F. (2013). Language
in economic development: Is English special and is linguistic fragmentation
bad?, in E. Erling and P. Seargeant (Eds.), English
and Development: Policy, Pedagogy and
Globalization (pp. 243–266). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 

Badie, B. (2014). La
fin des territoires: Essai sur le désordre international et sur l’utilité sociale du
respect. Paris: Fayard.
Barkey, K., & Gavrilis, G. (2016). The
Ottoman millet system: Non-territorial autonomy and its contemporary
legacy. Ethnopolitics 15(1), 24–42. 

Batory, A. (2010). Kin-state
identity in the European context: Citizenship, nationalism and constitutionalism in
Hungary. Nations and
Nationalism, 16(1), 31–48. 

Bowring, B. (1994). Report
of a Second Mission to the Republic of Latvia on behalf of the Fédération internationale des ligues des droits de l’homme and
the Bar of England and Wales Human Rights
Committee. London: Fédération internationale des ligues des droits de l’homme.
Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship
and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalising
states in the old ‘new Europe’ – and the new. Ethnic and Racial
Studies, 19(2), 411–437. 

Burckhardt, T. (2018). Linguistic
disenfranchisement and labour mobility in Europe. In: M. Gazzola, B.-A. Wickström and T. Templin (Eds.), Language
policy and linguistic justice: Economics, philosophical and sociolinguistic
approaches. (pp. 313–335). New York/Berlin: Springer. 

Burckhardt, T., & Gazzola, M. (2018). Le
plurilinguisme européen après le Brexit. Quels effets sur la participation démocratique et la mobilité des citoyens
européens ? in J.-C. Barbier (Ed.), Un
retour des nations en Europe ? Réflexions sur la crise politique de l’Union
européenne (p. 75–103). Paris: La Documentation Française.
Cardinal, L., & Léger, R. (2017). La
complétude institutionnelle en perspective. Politique et
Sociétés, 36(3), 3–14. 

Cardinal, L., & Sonntag, S. (2015a). Traditions
étatiques et régimes linguistiques: Comment et pourquoi s’ opèrent les choix de politiques
linguistiques? Revue internationale de politique
comparée, 22(1), 115–131. 

Cardinal, L., & Sonntag, S. K. (Eds.). (2015b). State
traditions and language regimes. Montreal, QC/Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
Chouinard, S. (2014). The
rise of non-territorial autonomy in Canada: Towards a doctrine of institutional completeness in the domain of minority
language
rights. Ethnopolitics, 13(2), 141–158. 

Coakley, J. (2012). Nationalism,
ethnicity and the state: Making and breaking
nations. London: Sage. 

Coakley, J. (2016a). Introduction:
dispersed minorities and non-territorial
autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 1–23. 

Coakley, J. (2016b). Conclusion:
Patterns of non-territorial
autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 166–185. 

Coakley, J. (Ed.) (2017). Non-territorial
autonomy in divided societies: Comparative
perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
Coakley, J. (2018). National
identity and the ‘Kohn dichotomy’. Nationalities
Papers, 46(2), 252–271. 

Csata, Z., & Marácz, L. (2016). Prospects
on Hungarian as a regional official language and Szeklerland’s territorial autonomy in
Romania. International Journal of Minority and Group
Rights, 23(4), 530–559. 

De Schutter, H. (2008). The
linguistic territoriality principle – a critique. Journal of Applied
Philosophy, 25(2), 105–120. 

Dembinska, M., Marácz, L., and Tonk, M. (2014). Introduction
to the special section: Minority politics and the territoriality principle in
Europe. Nationalities
Papers, 42(3), 355–375. 

Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s
growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 112(4), 1203–1250. 

Florida, R. (2005). Cities
and the creative
class. London: Routledge. 

Gazzola, M. (2006). Managing
multilingualism in the European Union: Language policy evaluation for the European
Parliament. Language
Policy, 5(4), 393–417. 

Grin, F. (1994). Immigrant
and autochthonous language rights: A territorial approach to
multilingualism. In: T. Skutnabb-Kangas, R. Phillipson & M. Rannut (Eds.), Linguistic
Human
Rights (pp. 31–48). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Grin, F. (2003). Language
policy evaluation and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Grin, F. (2010). L’aménagement
linguistique en
Suisse. Télescope 16(3), 55–74.
Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism,
community and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A. (2003). Introduction:
Language rights and political theory: Context, issues, and
approaches. In: W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language
rights and political
theory (pp. 1–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laponce, J. A. (1987). Languages
and their territories. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Laponce, J. A. (1993). Do
languages behave like animals? International Journal of the Sociology of
Language, 103(1), 19–30. 

Loughlin, J., Kincaid, J. & Swenden, W. (Eds.) (2013). Routledge
handbook of regionalism and
federalism. Abingdon: Routledge. 

Macartney, C. A. (1934). National
states and national minorities. London: Oxford University Press.
Marácz, L. (2011). Language
policies in Central and East European States with Hungarian minorities: Implications for linguistic rights protection of
national minorities in the EU. In I. Horváth and M. Tonk (Eds), Minority
politics within the Europe of
Regions (pp. 155–184). Cluj-Napoca: Scientia.
Marácz, L. (2020). Multilingualism
in the Hungarian Kingdom (1867–1918): Nature, legal basis and
practice. In A. Nuč & A. Wolf (Eds.), Das
habsburgische Babylon,
1848–1918 (pp. 59–72). Wien: Praesens Verlag.
May, S. (2012). Language
and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language. New York: Routledge.
McRae, K. D. (1975). The
principle of territoriality and the principle of personality in multilingual
states. International Journal of the Sociology of
Language, 1975(4), 33–54.
McRae, K. D. (1978). Bilingual
language districts in Finland and Canada: Adventures in the transplanting of an
institution. Canadian Public
Policy, 41, 331–351. 

McRae, K. D. (1983). Conflict
and compromise in multilingual societies. Switzerland. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
McRae, K. D. (1986). Conflict
and compromise in multilingual societies. Belgium. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
McRae, K. D. (1997). Conflict
and compromise in multilingual societies. Finland. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
McRae, K. D. (2007). Toward
language equality: Four democracies compared. International Journal of the Sociology of
Language, 187/1881, 13–34. 

Nimni, E. (Ed.) (2005). National
cultural autonomy and its contemporary
critics. London: Routledge.
Nimni, E. (2007) National-cultural autonomy as an alternative to minority territorial nationalism, Ethnopolitics, 6(3), 345–364. 

Nimni, E., Osipov, A., & Smith, D. J. (Eds.) (2013). The
challenge of non-territorial autonomy: Theory and
practice. Oxford: Peter Lang. 

Royal Commission. (1967). Report of the
Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism: General introduction: Book 1: Official
languages. Ottawa: Government Printer.
Safran, W. (1997). Citizenship
and nationality in democratic systems: Approaches to defining and acquiring membership in the political
community. International Political Science
Review, 18(3), 313–335. 

Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization:
A critical introduction. London: Macmillan International Higher Education. 

Scott, J. B. (1930). Nationality:
jus soli or jus sanguinis
. American Journal of
International
Law, 24(1), 58–64. 

Slama, S. (2017). Jus
soli, jus sanguinis, principes complémentaires et consubstantiels de la tradition
républicaine. Pouvoirs, 2017/1 (160), 19–34. 

Smith, D. J., & Cordell, K. (Eds.) (2008). Cultural
autonomy in contemporary
Europe. London: Routledge.
Smith, D. J., & Hiden, J. (2012). Ethnic
diversity and the nation state: National cultural autonomy
revisited. London: Routledge. 

Stojanović, N. (2010). Une
conception dynamique du principe de territorialité linguistique: la loi sur les langues du canton des
Grisons. Politique et
sociétés, 29(1), 231–259. 

Van Parijs, P. (2004). Europe’s
linguistic challenge. Archives Européennes de Sociologie/European Journal of
Sociology/Europäisches Archiv für
Soziologie, 45(1), 113–154. 

Van Parijs, P. (2011a). Linguistic
justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Van Parijs, P. (2011b). The
linguistic territoriality principle: Right violation or parity of
esteem? In P. De Grauwe & P. Van Parijs (Eds.), The
linguistic territoriality principle: Right violation or parity of esteem? [Re-Bel e-book
11] (pp. 5–20). Brussels: Re-Bel Initiative.
Vizi, B. (Ed.) (2016). Territoriality,
language rights and minorities – European perspectives, Special Issue, International Journal of
Minority and Group Rights, 23(4). 

Wickström, B.-A. (2019). The
percentage rule for minority language rights: Inadequate or discriminatory, Język. Komunikacja. Informacja, 141, 72–84.
Wickström, B.-A. (2020). On
the political economy of minority rights. Three ways to manipulate a minority: goals, rules, and border
poles. European Journal of Political
Economy, 641: 

Williams, C. H. (2013). Linguistic
minorities in democratic context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.