Article published in:
Revisiting Linguistic Territoriality in Contemporary EuropeEdited by Till Burckhardt, John Coakley and László Marácz
[Language Problems and Language Planning 45:2] 2021
► pp. 142–163
Territorial and non-territorial arrangements in a multi-ethno-linguistic context
The case of the Baltic States
Ádám Németh | University of Pécs
This article argues that the geographically dispersed distribution of the minorities in the Baltic republics
(apart from the Poles in Lithuania and the Russians in Northeast Estonia) constitutes an objective obstacle to provision of
territorially based minority rights. However, the potential alternatives to the territorial principle are also rarely adopted. The
cultural autonomy model in Estonia and Latvia failed to be implemented in practice, while threshold rules (in respect of
topographical bilingualism, for example) are in force only in Estonia, and there with the highest threshold in Europe (50%). The
paper aims to explain the reluctance to adopt these solutions by reviewing the main factors that affect language policy
implementation in general. It also considers the background to the debate over which languages need protection: the minority
languages within the Baltic States or the titular languages themselves (Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian), which at the global
level are small and vulnerable. In general, the strictness of language policies is in inverse relation to the size of the
minorities, with Lithuania being the most liberal and Latvia the most restrictive.
Keywords: Baltic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Russian, minority rights, language protection
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The territorial and personality principles
- 3.Obstacles to territorially based minority rights
- 3.1The ethno-linguistic landscape of the Baltic region
- 3.2Spatial patterns of the ethnic structure
- 3.3Attempts to build territorial autonomy
- 4.Alternatives to territorially defined rights
- 4.1Non-territorial cultural autonomy
- 4.2Threshold rules
- 5.Debates on language policy implementation
- 5.1Protection of the official languages
- 5.2Minority language rights
- 5.3Representation and perceived discrimination
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 24 November 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00075.nem
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00075.nem
References
Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National
Minorities
(2015) Fourth opinion on
Estonia. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
(2018a) Third opinion on
Latvia. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
(2018b) Fourth opinion on
Lithuania. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Agarin, T.
Alenius, K.
Apine, I.
Apsīte, E., Krišjāne, Z. and Bērziņš, M.
(2012) Emigration
from Latvia under economic crisis conditions. 2nd International conference on social science and
humanity,
IPEDR, 311, 134–138.
Berg, E.
Carpinelli, C.
Cianetti, L.
Council of Europe
(2016) Third report
submitted by Latvia pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the framework convention for the protection of national
minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
(2017) Fourth report
submitted by Lithuania pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the framework convention for the protection of national
minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
(2019) Fifth report
submitted by Estonia pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the framework convention for the protection of national
minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Croft, J.
CSBL
(2011) Population by mother tongue
and more widespread language skills. https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_OD/OSP_OD__tautassk__taut__tsk2000/TSK00-106.px
Csergő, Zs
Csernicskó, I. and Ferenc, V.
Dembinska, M., Marácz, L. and Tonk, M.
Dobržinskienė, R. and Stepanovienė, A.
Druviete, I.
Druviete, I. and Ozolins, U.
Druviete, I. and Kļava, G.
EFHR, European Foundation of Human
Rights
(2014) Lithuanian courts are still assigning financial penalties for
bilingual street names. Available at: http://en.efhr.eu/2014/04/10/lithuanian-courts-are-still-assigning-financial-penalties-for-bilingual-street-names
Ehala, M.
Galbreath, D. J. and Muižnieks, N.
Gobert, S.
Government of Latvia
(2018) Comments of
the Government of Latvia on the third opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the framework convention for
the protection of national minorities by Latvia. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Hirša, D.
(2019) Mūsu
valoda uz otrā gadu simteņa sliekšņa. In A. Veisbergs (Ed.), Valoda
un valsts. Zinatne, Valsts Valodas Komisija Raksti, 101, 175–185. https://www.president.lv/storage/kcfinder/files/VVK_Raksti,_10._sejuma_fails.pdf
Hogan-Brun, G., Ozolins, U., Ramoniene, M. and Rannut, M.
Jeffries, I.
Katus, K., Puur, A. and Põldma, A.
Kruma, K.
Kymlicka, W.
Lagerspetz, M.
Marácz, L.
McRae, K.
Mežs, I., Bunkše, E. and Rasa, K.
Mikkel, E. and Pettai, V.
Muižnieks, N., Rozenvalds, J. and Birka, I.
Németh, Á.
Németh, Á. and Dövényi, Z.
Németh, Á. and Léphaft, Á.
Nimni, E.
Osipov, A.
Papakostas, N.
(2012) Deconstructing
the notion of EU conditionality as a panacea in the context of enlargement. L’Europe en
Formation. 2(364). pp. 215–235. https://www.cairn.info/revue-l-europe-en-formation-2012-2-page-215.htm?contenu=article. 
Pettai, V. and Kallas, K.
Pilkington, H.
Plakans, A.
Popovski, V.
Poriņa, V.
Rannut, M.
(2004) Language
policy in Estonia. Noves SL Revista de Sociolinguistica. Spring-Summer
2004. Available at: http://www.gencat.cat/llengua/noves/noves/hm04primavera-estiu/docs/rannut.pdf
Shevel, O.
Smith, D. and Cordell, K.
Smith, D. J.
Statistics
Estonia
(2011) Population by native and foreign-origin, command of the
Estonian language, https://vana.stat.ee/sdb-update?db_update_id=13687
Vihalemm, T. and Hogan-Brun, G.
Vītoliņš, E. and Zvidriņš, P.