The territoriality principle stipulates that minority communities in a given territory should be linguistically accommodated. What are the economic effects of this principle? In this paper, we argue that the recognition of multiple languages confers respect on the minority group; it allows people to engage and participate meaningfully in society – thereby facilitating economic well-being. There is, however, a caveat: when recognition happens in areas where the minority is the overwhelming majority, there is a risk that the near-exclusive use of the minority language cuts the community off from the larger national state, which in turn stunts development. To test this, we focus on Transylvania, Romania. We leverage a legal stipulation that recognizes minority languages in areas where the minority constitutes more than 20% of the population. Using data at the municipal level, we find that recognition increases economic well-being in general – but not in areas where the minority are numerically dominant. Our results are normatively welcoming, but they also caution governments not simply to recognize minority languages but also to protect them adequately.
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.
Arcand, J. L., & Grin, F. (2013). Language in economic development: Is English special and is linguistic fragmentation Bad? In E. Erling & P. Seargeant (Eds.), English and development: Policy, pedagogy and globalization 171 (pp. 243–261). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.
Boia, L. (2015). Cum s-a românizat România. București: Humanitas.
Bracic, A. (2020). Breaking the exclusion cycle: How to promote cooperation between majority and minority ethnic groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Csata, Z. (2017). Munkaerőpiaci egyenlőtlenségek Romániában, etnikai metszetben. Erdélyi Társadalom, 15(1), 81–103.
Csata, Z. (2018). Economy and Ethnicity in Transylvania. In T. Kiss, I. Székely, T. Toró, N. Bárdi & I. Horváth (Eds.), Unequal accommodation of minority rights (pp. 345–379). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Csata, Z., Hlatky, R., & Liu, A. H. (2020). How to head count ethnic minorities: Validity of census surveys versus other identification strategies. East European Politics.
Csata, Z., & Marácz, L. K. (2016). Prospects on Hungarian as a regional official language and Szeklerland’s territorial autonomy in Romania. International Journal of Minority and Group Rights, 24(1), 1–30.
De Schutter, H. (2008). The linguistic territoriality principle: A critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(2), 105–120.
den Butter, F. A., & Mosch, R. H. (2003). Trade, trust and transaction cost. Amsterdam and Rotterdam: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 03-082/3.
Fosztó, L. (2009). Colecţie de studii despre romii din România. Cluj Napoca: Editura ISPMN.
Ginsburgh, V., & Weber, S. (2011). How many languages do we need?: The economics of linguistic diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D. N., & Weinstein, J. (2009). Coethnicity: Diversity and the dilemmas of collective action. New York: Russell Sage.
Horváth, I. (2009). A romániai nyelvpolitikák értékelése. Regio, 20(1), 3–16.
Horváth, I., Csata, Z., & Székely, I. G. (2021). Utilizarea limbii materne la nivelul unităților administrative locale: Estimare costuri. Cluj Napoca: Institutul Pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităţilor Naţionale.
Huebert, E. T. & Liu, A. H. (2017). Ethnic identity and attitudes toward state institutions: Evidence of judicial legitimacy among the indigenous in Latin America. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(4): 561–579.
Ionescu-Heroiu, M., Burduja, S., & Sandu, D. (2013). Competitive cities: Reshaping the economic geography of Romania: Report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Kim, M., Liu, A. H., Tuxhorn, K.-L., Brown, D. S., & Leblang, D. (2015). Lingua mercatoria: Language and foreign direct investment. International Studies Quarterly, 59(2): 330–343.
Kiss, T. (2010). Támpontok az erdélyi etnikai rétegződési rendszer vizsgálatához II. Pro Minoritate, 21, 3–42.
Kiss, T. (2018). A changing system of ethnic stratification: The social positions of Transylvanian Hungarians. In T. Kiss, I. Székely, T. Toró, N. Bárdi & I. Horváth (Eds.), Unequal accommodation of minority rights (pp. 419–458). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
Liu, A. H. (2015). Standardizing diversity: The political economy of language regimes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Liu, A. H., & Baird, V. (2012). Linguistic recognition as a source of confidence in the justice system. Comparative Political Studies, 45(10), 1203–1229.
Liu, A. H., Brown, D. S., & Dunn, M. H. (2015). Minority language recognition and trust: Evidence from twenty-five democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 113–138.
Liu, A. H., & Pizzi, E. (2018). Language of economic growth: A new measure of linguistic heterogeneity. British Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 953–980.
Liu, A. H., Shair-Rosenfield, S., Vance, L. R., & Csata, Z. (2018). Linguistic origins of gender equality and women’s rights. Gender and Society, 32(1), 82–108.
Marquardt, K. L. (2018). Identity, social mobility, and ethnic mobilization: Language and the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Comparative Political Studies, 51(7), 831–867.
Miguel, E., & Gugerty, M. K. (2005). Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2325–2368.
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.
Ricks, J. I. (2020). The effect of language on political appeal: Results from a survey experiment in Thailand. Political Behavior, 42(1), 83–104.
Salat, L., & Novák, C. Z. (2015). Ethnicity, nationalism, and the minority regime. In L. Stan & D. Vancea (Eds.), Post-communist Romania at twenty-five: Linking past, present, and future (pp. 63–86). Lanham: Lexington Books.
Sandu, D. (2011). Social disparities in the regional development and policies of Romania. International Review of Social Research, 1(1), 1–30.
Toró, T. (2020). Detached implementation: Discourse and practice in minority language use in Romania. Language Policy, 19(1), 5–29.
Van Parijs, P. (2011). Linguistic justice for Europe and for the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wickström, B. A. (2019). The percentage rule for minority language rights: Inadequate or discriminatory. Język. Komunikacja. Informacja, 141: 72–84.
Wolff, S. (2009). Ethnic minorities in Europe: The basic facts. Nottingham: Centre for International Crisis Management and Conflict Resolution.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Csata, Zsombor, Betty Compton, Amy H. Liu & Attila Papp Z
2024. Linguistic diversity in media and state language proficiencies: evidence from Hungarian minority regions in central-Eastern Europe. Regional & Federal Studies 34:4 ► pp. 473 ff.
Csata, Zsombor, Márton Péti, Betty Compton, Amy H. Liu & Zsolt Sándor
2024. The income effects of minority co-ethnic employment: the case of Hungarians in central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50:16 ► pp. 4192 ff.
Csata, Zsombor, Roman Hlatky & Amy H. Liu
2023. Ethnic Polarization and Human Development: The Conditional Effects of Minority Language Recognition. Studies in Comparative International Development 58:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Kao, Jay C., Amy H. Liu & Chun-Ying Wu
2023. Minority Language Recognition and Political Trust in Authoritarian Regimes. Political Research Quarterly 76:2 ► pp. 622 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.