Language policy debates regularly refer to the principles of personality and territoriality. Yet the precise meaning of these principles remains unclear. In this contribution, I conceptualize these principles as poles of a continuum between official bilingualism (instantiating the personality principle) and official unilingualism (exemplifying the territoriality principle), with a mixed regime in between (which grants a certain territorial primacy to a language, but allows exceptions based on linguistic affiliation). The question of the determination of particular points on the continuum cannot be separated from the metaterritorial question of the boundaries of the units within which those principles apply. Application of this ‘continuum model’ to Belgium draws attention to three language-political regimes. The first invokes a strict personality principle (Brussels). The second follows the strict territoriality principle (almost all municipalities in Flanders and Wallonia). The third is a mixed regime (a total of 27 ‘municipalities with facilities’ where one language enjoys primacy but speakers of another language enjoy certain linguistic ‘facilities’). The article also analyses the manner in which these regimes were historically established in Belgium in combination with a delineation of the language border and the division of the country into four language areas.
De Schutter, H. (2001). Taalpolitiek en multiculturalisme in het Brussels Nederlandstalige onderwijs. In: E. Witte & A. Mares (Eds.), Brusselse Thema’s 6. Twintig jaar onderzoek over Brussel (pp. 155–167).
De Schutter, H. (2017). Two principles of equal language recognition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20 (1), 75–87.
Grin, F. (2011). Using territoriality to support genuine linguistic diversity, not to get rid of it. In: P. De Grauwe and P. Van Parijs (Eds.), The linguistic territoriality principle: Right violation or parity of esteem? Re-Bel E-book 11 (pp. 28–33). Brussels: University Foundation.
Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the vernacular. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laponce, J. A. (1987). More about languages and their territories: A reply to Pattanayak and Bayer. Political Geography Quarterly, 6 (3), 265–267.
McRae, K. (1975). The principle of territoriality and the principle of personality in multilingual states. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 41, 33–54.
McRae, K. (2007). Toward language equality: Four democracies compared. International Journal for the Sociology of Language, 187/1881, 13–34.
Patten, A. (2003). What kind of bilingualism?, in W. Kymlicka and A. Patten (Eds.), Language rights and political theory (pp. 296–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Patten, A. (2014). Equal recognition: The moral foundations of minority rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Raskin, B. (2012). De taalgrens: of wat de Belgen zowel verbindt als verdeelt. Leuven: Davidsfonds.
Réaume, D. (2003). Beyond personality: The territorial and personal principles of language policy reconsidered. In W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language rights and political theory (pp. 271–295). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Renner, K. (2005 [1899]). State and nation. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National cultural autonomy and its contemporary critics (pp. 15–48). London: Routledge.
Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism. (1967). Report. Accessed on 5 July 2021 at [URL]
van der Jeught, S. (2017). Territoriality and freedom of language: The case of Belgium, Current Issues in Language Planning, 18 (2), 181–198.
Van Parijs, Ph. (2004). Europe’s linguistic challenge. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie, 45 (1), 113–154.
Van Parijs, Ph. (2011). Linguistic justice for Europe and for the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Witte, E. and Van Velthoven, H. (1998). Taal en politiek. De Belgische casus in een historisch perspectief. Brussel: Balans/VUBPRESS.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.