Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 47:3 (2023) ► pp.279–299

Elites, centers and “forces collectives”

Language standardization from Meillet to Gramsci – and beyond

 | Independent scholar
 | Università Cattolica S.C. di Milano
The concept of standard language has become highly controversial after the rise of the postmodernist paradigm. This article traces the roots of the concept in the studies of a group of European linguists who inquired into the spread of “common languages” and related it to the processes of modernization and the role of social elites and urban centers during the 1920s. It then reviews the central role it played in the studies on nationalism and nation-building after 1945 and discusses how the focus on structural, macro-historical processes as determinants of the emergence of standard languages came to be abandoned in classical and postmodernist approaches to language standardization. Finally, it suggests that Antonio Gramsci’s insights on the “language question” in Italy should be read on the background of the early research on common languages and suggests that a reconsideration of macro-historical approaches could contribute to the understanding of the spread of Global English.
Keywords: standard language, language standardization, Antoine Meillet, Otto Jespersen, Stein Rokkan, Karl Deutsch, Antonio Gramsci, Global English, history of language planning, postmodernism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Langues communes and standard languages
  • 3.Standard languages and nation-building: Karl W. Deutsch and Stein Rokkan
  • 4.Standardization and social planning: Heinz Kloss and Einar Haugen
  • 5.Postmodern language planning and the eclipses of the grandes forces collectives
  • 6.Gramsci, the “common language” and Global English
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.22037.col
References (57)
References
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ascoli, G. I. (1873). Proemio. In: Archivio glottologico italiano, Vol. I1, pp. v – liv.Google Scholar
Auer, P. (1998). Dialect Levelling and the Standard Varieties in Europe, In: Folia Linguistica vol. 32, no. 1–2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonfante, G. (1947). The Neolinguistic Position (A Reply to Hall’s Criticism of Neolinguistics). In: Language, Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 344–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramani, D. (2011). Stein Rokkan: The Macro-Sociological Fresco of State, Nation and Democracy in Europe. In: Bull, M. et al. (eds.), Masters of Political Science. Vol. 2. London: Routledge/ECPR.Google Scholar
Carlucci, A. (2013). Gramsci and Languages: Unification, Diversity, Hegemony. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge University Press (2nd Edition).Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. W. (1942). International Affairs: The Trend of European Nationalism – the Language Aspect. In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 533–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1953). Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
(1961). Social Mobilization and Political Development. In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 493–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esman, M. J. (ed., 1977). Ethnic Conflict in Western Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Directions in Sociolinguistics: Report on an Interdisciplinary Seminar. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, Vol. 2020, no. 263, pp 37–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flora, P. (1999). State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, J. (1986). The World City Hypothesis. John Friedmann. Development and Change. In International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 17, no.1, pp. 69–83.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1964). La lingua unica e l’Esperanto. In: Ferrata, G. & Gallo, N. (eds.), (2000). pagine di Gramsci, Vol. I. Nel tempo della lotta (1914–1926), Milano: Il Saggiatore, pp. 271–275.Google Scholar
(1975). Quaderni del carcere. 41 vols. Ed. by V. Garritana, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966). Dialect, Language, Nation. In: American Anthropologist, Vol. 681, pp. 922–935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1973). The Curse of Babel. In: Daedalus, Vol. 102, no. 3 (Language as a Human Problem), pp. 47–57.Google Scholar
Ives, P. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and Global English: Language Politics in Globalisation In: Political Studies, Vol 581, pp. 516–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Global English and the Limits of Liberalism: Confronting Global Capitalism and Challenges to the Nation State. In: Ricento, T. (ed.), Language Policy & Political Economy: English in a Global Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 48–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacquemet, M. (2005). Transidiomatic Practices: Language and Power in the Age of Globalization. In: Language & Communication, Vol. 25, no.3, pp. 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jernudd, B. H. & Nekvapil, J. (2012). History of the Field: A Sketch. In B. Spolsky (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language, its Nature, Development and Origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
(1946). Mankind, Nation and Individual from a Linguistic Point of View, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
(2010). Selected Writings. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Juul, A. & Nielsen, H. F. (1989). Otto Jespersen: Facets of his Life and Work. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kloss, H. (1969). Research Possibilities on Group Bilingualism: A Report. Quebec: International Center for research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
(1993). Abstand Languages and Ausbau Languages. In: A Retrospective of the Journal Anthropological Linguistics: Selected Papers, 1959–1985. Indiana University, pp. 158–170.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1964). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. New York: Columbia University Dissertation Publishing.
Linn, A. R. (2002). Quousque Tandem: Language-teaching Reform in 19th-century Scandinavia. In: The Henry Sweet Society Bulletin, Vol. 381. pp. 34–42.Google Scholar
(2008). The Birth of Applied Linguistics: The Anglo-Scandinavian School as Discourse Community. In: Historiographia Linguistica, Vol. 35 (n. 3/4), pp. 342–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo Piparo, F. (2010). The Linguistic Roots of Gramsci’s Non-Marxism. In: Ives, P. & Lacorte, R. (eds.), Gramsci, Language and Translation. Plymouth: Lexington Books, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevedon – Buffalo – Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. (2011). Sociolinguistics, Colonial and Postcolonial: An Integrationist Perspective. In: Language Sciences, Vol. 331, pp. 680–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, A. (1920). Aperçu d’une histoire de la langue grecque. Paris: Achette.Google Scholar
(1925). La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.Google Scholar
(1928). Les langues dans l’Europe nouvelle, Paris: Payot (2nd ed.).Google Scholar
(1967). The Comparative Method in Historical Linguistics (translated by Gordon B. Ford), Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (2001). Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardization. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). The Ideology of the Standard Language. In: Llamas, C., Mullany, L. & Stockwell, P. (eds.) Routledge Companion in Sociolinguistics, London: Routledge, pp. 133–139.Google Scholar
Muljačić, Ž. (1985). Come applicare il modello standardologico comparativo in diacronia? Sulla “focalizzazione” nella storia linguistica d’Italia. In: Agostiniani, L., Bellucci-Maffei, P. & Paoli, M. (eds.), Linguistica storica e cambiamento linguistico. Roma: Bulzoni, pp. 397–410.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2006). Postmodernism in Language Policy. In: T. Ricento (ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 60–76.Google Scholar
(2019). From Translanguaging to Translingual Activism. In: Marcedo, D. (ed.), Decolonizing Foreign Language Education: The Misteaching of English and Other Colonial Languages. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rokkan, S. & Urwin, D. (1983). Economy, Territory, Identity: The Politics of the European Peripheries. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosiello, L. (2010). Linguistics and Marxism in the Thought of Antonio Gramsci. In: Ives, P. & Lacorte, R. (eds.), Gramsci, Language and Translation. Plymouth: Lexington Books, pp. 29–49.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. & Jernudd, B. H. (1971). Can Languages Be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations. University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City. New York London Tokyo, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sklair, L. (2001). The Transnational Capitalist Class, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (1998). Nationalism and Modernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1900). The History of Language. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning Language, Planning Inequality. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2006). Critical Theory in Language Policy. In: T. Ricento (ed.): An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 42–59.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. W. & Milans Pérez, M. (2018). Research and Practice in Language Policy and Planning. In: The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, E. (1977). Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford; Stanford University Press.Google Scholar