Cover not available
Review article published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 24:3 (2000) ► pp.273–278
Review article

Francisco Veuthey (ed.). Jarlibro 2000. Rotterdam: UEA, 2000. 308 pp. andKongresa Libro Tel-Avivo, 25 julio – 1 aŭgusto 2000. Rotterdam: UEA, 2000. 104 pp.

Reviewer
| University of Hartford,
Published online: 8 February 2001
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.24.3.06ton
References (10)
References
Bollag, Burton. 2000. The New Latin: English Dominates in Academe. Chronicle of Higher Education, September 81: 73–77.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hal. 2000. A Farewell to Esperanto? Lingua Franca, May/June: 57–62.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graddol, David. 1997. The Future of English? London: British Council.Google Scholar
Janton, Pierre. 1993. Esperanto: Language, Literature, Community. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, David K. 1987. Esperanto and Esperantism: Symbols and Motivations in a Movement for Linguistic Equality. LPLP 111: 104–25. Reprinted in Humphrey Tonkin (ed.), Esperanto, Interlinguistics, and Planned Language. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1997: 39–65.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel, and Suzanne Romaine. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nuessel, Frank. 2000. The Esperanto Language. Ottawa: Legas.Google Scholar
Shorris, Earl. 2000. The Last Word: Can the World’s Smallest Languages Be Saved? Harper’s, August: 35–43.Google Scholar
Wood, Richard E. 1979. A Voluntary, Non-Territorial Speech Community. In William Francis Mackey and Jacob Ornstein (eds.), Sociolinguistic Studies in Language Contact: Methods and Cases. The Hague: Mouton: 433–50.Google Scholar