Esperanto seems to share several basic characteristics with minority languages. Tendencies regarded as basic features of the Esperanto community, such as voluntariness, non-ethnic composition, non-territorial distribution or the “internal idea” can be observed also among minority languages. It can thus be argued that phenomena and tendencies that can be observed in the case of Esperanto are even clearer or more pronounced in the case of the (other) minority languages, and vice versa. The two can function as “mirrors” for one another. Not only their aims to promote multilingualism, but also the current opportunities and problems that these strikingly similar linguistic communities face, appear to make cooperation useful and open new prospects for comparative research.
2023. “(W)Rapping” Traditions into Modernity: The Negotiation of Emilian and Esperanto Identities in YouTube Hip-Hop Songs. Modern Languages Open 2023:1
Hampton, Jessica
2023. Adopting Triangulation as an Attempt to Square the Circle: Swipe up for More. Modern Languages Open 2023:1
Schreyer, Christine
2021. Constructed Languages. Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1 ► pp. 327 ff.
ARAY, Başak
2020. ARADİLLER ve ARADİLBİLİM. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 10:19 ► pp. 127 ff.
Tonkin, Humphrey
2015. Language Planning and Planned Languages: How Can Planned Languages Inform Language Planning?. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 13:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.