Public-private domain distinction as an aspect of LPP frameworks
A case study of Bangladesh
While macro-level language policy and planning (LPP) that is done mainly by governments still dominates thinking in the field, limitations of this focus have been demonstrated by recent broader and more focused conceptualizations of LPP. For instance, global LPP, particularly for languages of wider communication such as English, has received considerable attention. Similarly, studies of meso- and micro-level planning has shown that many LPP decisions have to be taken at sub-national institutional, communal and familial levels, particularly in contexts where macro-level policies do not exist, where non-interventionist policies of benign neglect are deemed appropriate from a political point of view, or where a problem is too small to attract national attention. These recent developments have led to additions to the macro-level LPP framework, providing more appropriate and contextually relevant tools to understand LPP efforts carried out by LPP “actors” both within and beyond individual polities. However, this diversification of LPP frames and contexts can also be seen as going through a process of simultaneous unification and taking a macro-like character, as illustrated by the distinctions being drawn between the public and the private sector LPP. Taking Bangladesh as a case and drawing on LPP issues pertaining to public and private universities as well as pre-tertiary educational institutions with a particular focus on medium of instruction and the private tutoring industry, we argue for the relevance of this macro-like distinction for a better understanding of complex LPP issues in the country. We maintain that the public-private domain distinction may complement existing variables by adding a dimension that is increasingly becoming important in a globalized world dominated by neoliberalism.
Keywords: private sector LPP, language and private tutoring, public sector LPP, English-medium schools, English-medium higher education, Bangladesh, neoliberalism, LPP framework
Published online: 12 September 2014
(2011) DU history and its part in Bangladeshi national identity formation. bdnews24.com . Retrieved from http://opinion.bdnews24.com/2011/09/25/du-history-and-its-part-in-bangladeshi-national-identity-formation/
Alam, M., Haque, M.S., & Siddque, S.F.
(2009) Private higher education in Bangladesh. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO. Retrieved 20 Jan 2012 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001501/150151e.pdf
Al-Quaderi, G.G., & Al Mahmud, A.
Banu, R., & Sussex, R.
Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M.
Bray, M., & Lykins, C.
Chua, C.S.K., & Baldauf, R.B. Jr
Dang, H.-A., & Rogers, F.H.
Duchene, A., & Heller, M.
Erling, E.J., Hamid, M.O., & Seargeant, P.
Hamid, M.O., & Baldauf, R.B. Jr
Hamid, M.O., Sussex, R., & Khan, A.
Hamid, M.O., Jahan, I., & Islam, M.M.
Kaplan, R.B., & Baldauf, B.R.
Khan, R.H., Mridha, A.H.A., & Barua, S.
Salahuddin, M., Akbard, D., Hamid, O. & Islam, R.
(2009) Institutional, economic and technical dimensions of choosing private tertiary education in Bangladesh: Lessons for Australian Universities. ICIT '09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Phillipson, R.
Cited by other publications
Hamid, M. Obaidul
Hamid, M. Obaidul & Elizabeth J. Erling
Hamid, M. Obaidul & Andy Kirkpatrick
Hamid, M. Obaidul & Shuqin Luo
Obaidul Hamid, M.
Phan, T.T. Huyen & M. Obaidul Hamid
Rahman, Mohammad Mosiur, Md Shaiful Islam, Abdul Karim, Takad Ahmed Chowdhury, Muhammad Mushfiqur Rahman, Prodhan Mahbub Ibna Seraj & Manjet Kaur Mehar Singh
Rahman, Mohammad Mosiur & Manjet Kaur Mehar Singh
Rahman, Mohammad Mosiur, Manjet Kaur Mehar Singh & Abdul Karim
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.