Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 39:1 (2015) ► pp. 84104
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Alcalde, Javier
2018.  In Language Policy and Linguistic Justice,  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo
ARAY, Başak
2020. Aradiller ve Aradilbilim. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Crossref logo
Brosch, Cyril & Sabine Fiedler
2018.  In Language Policy and Linguistic Justice,  pp. 499 ff. Crossref logo
Fiedler, Sabine & Cyril Brosch
2018. Esperanto – a lingua franca in use. Language Problems and Language Planning 42:2  pp. 220 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

A New Framework Strategy for Multilingualism
Blanke, D.
(1996) Wege zur interlinguistischen und esperantologischen Fachliteratur. Language Problems and Language Planning, 2, 168–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Plansprache als Fachsprache. In L. Hoffmann, H. Kalverkämper and H.E. Wiegand (Eds.), Fachsprachen. Languages for Special Purposes. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Fachsprachenforschung und Terminologiewissenschaft. An International Handbook of Special-Language and Terminology Research (pp. 875–880). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010) Sprachwandel im Esperanto — gezeigt an Beispielen aus der Lexik. In K. Reinke and C. Sinner (Eds.), Sprache als Spiegel der Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Johannes Klare zum 80. Geburtstag (pp. 51–77). München: Peniope.Google Scholar
Bruthiaux, P.
(2002) Predicting challenges to English as a global language in the 21st century. Language Problems and Language Planning, 26(2), 129–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, P.V.
(2006) Language policy in the European Union: European/ English / Elite / Equal / Esperanto Union? Language Problems and Language Planning, 30(1), 21–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corsetti, R.
(1996) A mother tongue spoken mainly by fathers. Language Problems and Language Planning, 3, 263–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Swaan, A.
(2007) The language predicament of the EU since the enlargements. Sociolinguistica, 21, 1–21.Google Scholar
Duličenko, A.D.
(1989) Ethnic language and planned language. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 48–61). Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J.
(2010) Minority languages and group identity: Cases and categories. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. & MacPherson, L.
(1987) Views of constructed languages, with special reference to Esperanto. Language Problems and Language Planning, 11, 283–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eichner, H.
(2012) Konstruierte Intersprachen: Herausforderung und Chance für die Sprachwissenschaft? In A.B. Kölbl and J. Bretz (Eds.), Zwischen Utopie und Wirklichkeit. Konstruierte Sprachen für die globalisierte Welt (Begleitband zur Ausstellung an der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (14. Juni bis 9. September 2012) (pp. 123–149). München: Allitera.Google Scholar
Fettes, M.
(2003) The geostrategies of interlingualism. In J. Maurais and M.A. Morris (Eds.), Languages in a globalising world (pp. 37–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, S.
(2010a) Approaches to fair linguistic communication. European Journal of Language Policy, 2(1), 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010b) The English-as-a-lingua-franca approach: Linguistic fair play? Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(3), 201–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010c) Kultur und Plansprache: Betrachtungen zum Esperanto. In I.-A. Busch-Lauer (Ed.), Kaleidoskop der Kulturen (pp. 181–202). Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
(2012) The Esperanto denaskulo: The status of the native speaker of Esperanto within and beyond the planned language community. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(1), 69–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G.
(2007) Esperanto-Musik — Teil der Kultur der Esperanto-Sprachgemeinschaft. In D. Blanke (Ed.), Esperanto heute — wie aus einem Projekt eine Sprache wurde (Beiträge der 16. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V., 1.-3. Dezember 2006 in Berlin. Interlinguistische Informationen. Beiheft 14), 59–69. Berlin: Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V.Google Scholar
Forster, P.G.
(1982) The Esperanto Movement. The Hague: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerhards, J.
(2010) Mehrsprachigkeit im vereinten Europa: Transnationales sprachliches Kapital als Ressource in einer globalisierten Welt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburgh, V. & Weber, S.
(2011) How many languages do we need? The economics of linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, M.
(2000) Englisch als neuer Typ von Weltsprache und europäische Nationalsprachen (Artikel 68). In W. Besch, et al. (Eds.), Sprachgeschichte: ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung (pp. 1117–1123). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grin, F.
(2004) On the costs of cultural diversity. In P. van Parijs (Ed.) Cultural diversity versus economic solidarity (pp. 189–302). Brussels: de Boeck.Google Scholar
(2005) L’enseignement des langues étrangères comme politique publique. www​.unige​.ch​/eti​/elf ( Publications — > Rapports de recherche ) [accessed: 1 Sept 2014].Google Scholar
(2008) Principles of policy evaluation and their application to multlingualism in the European Union. In X. Arzoz (Ed.), Respecting linguistic diversity in the European Union (pp. 73–83). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grzega, J.
(2006) EuroLinguistischer Parcours. Kernwissen zur europäischen Sprachkultur. Frankfurt/M.: IKO.Google Scholar
Hagler, M.G.
(1978) The Esperanto language as a literary medium. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Bloomington: Indiana University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Haselhuber, J.
(2012) Mehrsprachigkeit in der Europäischen Union. Eine Analyse der EU-Sprachenpolitik, mit besonderem Fokus auf Deutschland. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hüllen, W.
(2003) Global English: Desired and dreaded. In R. Ahrens (Ed.), Europäische Sprachenpolitik/European Language Policy (pp. 113–122). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Jansen, W.
(2010) La Fundamenta Esperanto: nekontesteble eŭropa, sed … In D. Blanke and U. Lins (Eds.), La arto labori kune. Festlibro por Humphrey Tonkin (pp. 271–289). Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Kimura, G.C.
(2009) Esperanto als Minderheitensprache: Eine sprachsoziologische Betrachtung. In S. Fiedler (Ed.), Esperanto und andere Sprachen im Vergleich (Beiträge der 18. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V., 21.-23. November 2008, in Berlin). Interlinguistische Informationen. Beiheft 16) (pp. 11–24). Berlin: Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik.Google Scholar
(2010) La kornvala kaj Esperanto: entreprenoj similaj? In D. Blanke and U. Lins (Eds.), La arto labori kune. Festlibro por Humphrey Tonkin (pp. 171–177). Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
(2012) Esperanto and minority languages. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(2), 168–181.Google Scholar
Kraus P.A.
(2008) A union of diversity: Language, identity and polity-building in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, D.C.S.
(2003) Between English and Esperanto: What does it take to be a world language? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 164, 33–63.Google Scholar
Nißl, S.
(2011) Die Sprachenfrage in der Europäischen Union. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Sprachenpolitik für Europa. München: Herbert Utz Verlag.Google Scholar
Okrent, A.
(2009) In the land of invented languages. New York: Spiegel & Grau.Google Scholar
Parkvall, M.
(2011) How European is Esperanto? A typological study. Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(1), 63–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philippe, B.
(1991) Sprachwandel bei einer Plansprache am Beispiel des Esperanto. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R.
(2003) English-Only Europe. Challenging language policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piron, C.
(1989) Who are the speakers of Esperanto? In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlinguistics. Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 157–172). Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Choosing an official fanguage. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. Mattheier and P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics / Soziolinguistik: An international handbook of the science of language and society / Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft. Vol. 3 / 3. (pp. 2484–2493). Teilband: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pool, J. & B. Grofman
(1989) Linguistic artificiality and cognitive competence. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 145–156). Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reagan, T.G.
(2009) Language matters: Reflections on educational linguistics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Schubert, K.
(1989) Interlinguistics: Its aims, its achievements, and its place in language science. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlingistics: Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 7–44). Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, G.
(2008) Concise encyclopedia of the original literature of Esperanto. New York: Mondial.Google Scholar
Talebinezhad, M.R. & Aliakbari M.
(2001) Basic assumptions in teaching English as an international language. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(7). [http://​iteslj​.org​/Articles​/Talebinezhad​-EIL​.html] [20 December 2014]Google Scholar
Tellier, A.
(2012) (Ed.). Esperanto as a starter language for child second-language learners in the primary school. Stoke-on-Trent: Esperanto UK.Google Scholar
Tonkin, H.
(2007) Recent studies in Esperanto and interlinguistics: 2006. Language Problems and Language Planning, 31(2), 169–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Parijs, P.
(2004) Europe’s linguistic challenge. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, XLV(1), 113–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Linguistic justice for Europe & for the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, P.J.
(2009) Kampf der Sprachen. Die Europäische Union vor der sprachlichen Zerreißprobe. Hamburg: Krämer.Google Scholar
Wilss, W.
(2000) Weltgesellschaft — Weltverkehrssprache — Weltkultur. Globalisierung vs. Fragmentierung. In W. Wilss (Ed.): Weltgesellschaft, Weltverkehrssprache. Weltkultur (pp. 1–18). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Wright, S.
(2000) Community and communication: The role of language in nation state building and European integration. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wu H.
(2005) Das Sprachenregime der Institutionen der Europäischen Union zwischen Grundsatz und Effizienz. Frankfurt/M.: Lang.Google Scholar