Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 39:1 (2015) ► pp.84–104

The topic of planned languages (Esperanto) in the current specialist literature

| Universität Leipzig

Although planned languages such as Esperanto have achieved only limited success in their attempt to facilitate international communication so far, they have attracted considerable attention in discussions on the language question. This article examines how the topic is treated in recent publications on linguistics and language policy. The analysis reveals that researchers put forward a number of recurrent arguments for and against. Among arguments in favour of planned languages are their contribution to equal rights in international communication, their positive impact on the learning of other foreign languages, and their cost saving effects. Arguments against them include their bad image and limited communicative functions. Some researchers make predictions about the possible developments in the linguistic structure of Esperanto in the case of its official adoption, taking the development of ethnic languages as a point of departure. Esperanto’s Eurocentricity, its alleged isolation from culture, and the (non)existence of native speakers are among the features that are controversially discussed in the literature. Some conclusions for further interlinguistic research are drawn.

Keywords: planned language, Esperanto, interlinguistics, language policy
Published online: 17 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.39.1.05fie
References
A New Framework Strategy for Multilingualism
(2005) [URL] [accessed: 1 Sept 2014].Google Scholar
Blanke, D
(1996) Wege zur interlinguistischen und esperantologischen Fachliteratur. Language Problems and Language Planning, 21, 168–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Plansprache als Fachsprache. In L. Hoffmann, H. Kalverkämper and H.E. Wiegand (Eds.), Fachsprachen. Languages for Special Purposes. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Fachsprachenforschung und Terminologiewissenschaft. An International Handbook of Special-Language and Terminology Research (pp. 875–880). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010) Sprachwandel im Esperanto — gezeigt an Beispielen aus der Lexik. In K. Reinke and C. Sinner (Eds.), Sprache als Spiegel der Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Johannes Klare zum 80. Geburtstag (pp. 51–77). München: Peniope.Google Scholar
Bruthiaux, P
(2002) Predicting challenges to English as a global language in the 21st century. Language Problems and Language Planning, 26(2), 129–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, P.V
(2006) Language policy in the European Union: European/ English / Elite / Equal / Esperanto Union? Language Problems and Language Planning, 30(1), 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corsetti, R
(1996) A mother tongue spoken mainly by fathers. Language Problems and Language Planning, 31, 263–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Swaan, A
(2007) The language predicament of the EU since the enlargements. Sociolinguistica, 211, 1–21.Google Scholar
Duličenko, A.D
(1989) Ethnic language and planned language. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 48–61). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J
(2010) Minority languages and group identity: Cases and categories. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. & MacPherson, L
(1987) Views of constructed languages, with special reference to Esperanto. Language Problems and Language Planning, 111, 283–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eichner, H
(2012) Konstruierte Intersprachen: Herausforderung und Chance für die Sprachwissenschaft? In A.B. Kölbl and J. Bretz (Eds.), Zwischen Utopie und Wirklichkeit. Konstruierte Sprachen für die globalisierte Welt (Begleitband zur Ausstellung an der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (14. Juni bis 9. September 2012) (pp. 123–149). München: Allitera.Google Scholar
Fettes, M
(2003) The geostrategies of interlingualism. In J. Maurais and M.A. Morris (Eds.), Languages in a globalising world (pp. 37–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, S
(2010a) Approaches to fair linguistic communication. European Journal of Language Policy, 2(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b) The English-as-a-lingua-franca approach: Linguistic fair play? Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(3), 201–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010c) Kultur und Plansprache: Betrachtungen zum Esperanto. In I.-A. Busch-Lauer (Ed.), Kaleidoskop der Kulturen (pp. 181–202). Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Fischer, G
(2007) Esperanto-Musik — Teil der Kultur der Esperanto-Sprachgemeinschaft. In D. Blanke (Ed.), Esperanto heute — wie aus einem Projekt eine Sprache wurde (Beiträge der 16. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V., 1.-3. Dezember 2006 in Berlin. Interlinguistische Informationen. Beiheft 14), 59–69. Berlin: Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V.Google Scholar
Forster, P.G
(1982) The Esperanto Movement. The Hague: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerhards, J
(2010) Mehrsprachigkeit im vereinten Europa: Transnationales sprachliches Kapital als Ressource in einer globalisierten Welt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginsburgh, V. & Weber, S
(2011) How many languages do we need? The economics of linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Görlach, M
(2000) Englisch als neuer Typ von Weltsprache und europäische Nationalsprachen (Artikel 68). In W. Besch, et al. (Eds.), Sprachgeschichte: ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung (pp. 1117–1123). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grin, F
(2004) On the costs of cultural diversity. In P. van Parijs (Ed.) Cultural diversity versus economic solidarity (pp. 189–302). Brussels: de Boeck.Google Scholar
(2005) L’enseignement des langues étrangères comme politique publique. [URL] ( Publications — > Rapports de recherche ) [accessed: 1 Sept 2014].Google Scholar
(2008) Principles of policy evaluation and their application to multlingualism in the European Union. In X. Arzoz (Ed.), Respecting linguistic diversity in the European Union (pp. 73–83). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grzega, J
(2006) EuroLinguistischer Parcours. Kernwissen zur europäischen Sprachkultur. Frankfurt/M.: IKO.Google Scholar
Hagler, M.G
(1978) The Esperanto language as a literary medium. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Bloomington: Indiana University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Haselhuber, J
(2012) Mehrsprachigkeit in der Europäischen Union. Eine Analyse der EU-Sprachenpolitik, mit besonderem Fokus auf Deutschland. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hüllen, W
(2003) Global English: Desired and dreaded. In R. Ahrens (Ed.), Europäische Sprachenpolitik/European Language Policy (pp. 113–122). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Jansen, W
(2010) La Fundamenta Esperanto: nekontesteble eŭropa, sed … In D. Blanke and U. Lins (Eds.), La arto labori kune. Festlibro por Humphrey Tonkin (pp. 271–289). Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
Kimura, G.C
(2009) Esperanto als Minderheitensprache: Eine sprachsoziologische Betrachtung. In S. Fiedler (Ed.), Esperanto und andere Sprachen im Vergleich (Beiträge der 18. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik e.V., 21.-23. November 2008, in Berlin). Interlinguistische Informationen. Beiheft 16) (pp. 11–24). Berlin: Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik.Google Scholar
(2010) La kornvala kaj Esperanto: entreprenoj similaj? In D. Blanke and U. Lins (Eds.), La arto labori kune. Festlibro por Humphrey Tonkin (pp. 171–177). Rotterdam: UEA.Google Scholar
(2012) Esperanto and minority languages. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(2), 168–181.Google Scholar
Kraus P.A
(2008) A union of diversity: Language, identity and polity-building in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, D.C.S
(2003) Between English and Esperanto: What does it take to be a world language? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1641, 33–63.Google Scholar
Nißl, S
(2011) Die Sprachenfrage in der Europäischen Union. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Sprachenpolitik für Europa. München: Herbert Utz Verlag.Google Scholar
Okrent, A
(2009) In the land of invented languages. New York: Spiegel & Grau.Google Scholar
Parkvall, M
(2011) How European is Esperanto? A typological study. Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(1), 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippe, B
(1991) Sprachwandel bei einer Plansprache am Beispiel des Esperanto. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R
(2003) English-Only Europe. Challenging language policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piron, C
(1989) Who are the speakers of Esperanto? In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlinguistics. Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 157–172). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Choosing an official fanguage. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. Mattheier and P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics / Soziolinguistik: An international handbook of the science of language and society / Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft. Vol. 3 / 31. (pp. 2484–2493). Teilband: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pool, J. & B. Grofman
(1989) Linguistic artificiality and cognitive competence. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 145–156). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reagan, T.G
(2009) Language matters: Reflections on educational linguistics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Schubert, K
(1989) Interlinguistics: Its aims, its achievements, and its place in language science. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlingistics: Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 7–44). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, G
(2008) Concise encyclopedia of the original literature of Esperanto. New York: Mondial.Google Scholar
Talebinezhad, M.R. & Aliakbari M
(2001) Basic assumptions in teaching English as an international language. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(7). [[URL]] [20 December 2014]Google Scholar
Tellier, A
(2012) (Ed.). Esperanto as a starter language for child second-language learners in the primary school. Stoke-on-Trent: Esperanto UK.Google Scholar
Tonkin, H
(2007) Recent studies in Esperanto and interlinguistics: 2006. Language Problems and Language Planning, 31(2), 169–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Parijs, P
(2004) Europe’s linguistic challenge. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, XLV(1), 113–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Linguistic justice for Europe & for the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, P.J
(2009) Kampf der Sprachen. Die Europäische Union vor der sprachlichen Zerreißprobe. Hamburg: Krämer.Google Scholar
Wilss, W
(2000) Weltgesellschaft — Weltverkehrssprache — Weltkultur. Globalisierung vs. Fragmentierung. In W. Wilss (Ed.): Weltgesellschaft, Weltverkehrssprache. Weltkultur (pp. 1–18). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Wright, S
(2000) Community and communication: The role of language in nation state building and European integration. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wu H
(2005) Das Sprachenregime der Institutionen der Europäischen Union zwischen Grundsatz und Effizienz. Frankfurt/M.: Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Alcalde, Javier
2018. Linguistic Justice: An Interdisciplinary Overview of the Literature. In Language Policy and Linguistic Justice, ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
ARAY, Başak
2020. ARADİLLER ve ARADİLBİLİM. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 10:19 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Brosch, Cyril & Sabine Fiedler
2018. Esperanto and Linguistic Justice: An Empirical Response to Sceptics. In Language Policy and Linguistic Justice, ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Coluzzi, Paolo
2022. How learning Toki Pona may help improving communication strategies in a foreign or second language. Language Problems and Language Planning 46:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Fiedler, Sabine
2022. English as a lingua franca and linguistic justice: insights from exchange students’ experiences. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2022:277 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Fiedler, Sabine & Cyril Brosch
2018. Esperanto – a lingua franca in use. Language Problems and Language Planning 42:2 ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Esperanto – Lingua Franca and Language Community [Studies in World Language Problems, 10], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.