Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp. 85–99

Invented cities, invented languages

Esperanto and urban textuality, 1887–1914

| University of Hartford
L. L. Zamenhof saw the creation of his proposed international language, Esperanto, as a process of construction, rather like the building of a city. This new city of words would replace the walls of language difference that had previously separated the nations. His poems imagined a new “foundation” replacing the Tower of Babel and destroying the walls of Jericho. Unlike most other projectors of international languages, Zamenhof saw the creation of a community of Esperanto speakers, who could claim ownership of the language, as crucially important. The language began as text, but soon, as a result of its growing community of users, became a spoken language. The language owed its popularity to the emergence of an urban European middle class, eager to travel and learn about the world — at a time when the modern city was also emerging, its sense of identity defined above all by shared text and a common narrative. A common narrative and a shared text were also generated among the speakers of Esperanto, who were imbued with faith in technological progress and a corresponding belief in the achievement of common values. They developed common symbols and common modes of organization reflecting those that they found around them, notably the holding of annual international congresses in European cities, and other city-based activities. Zamenhof’s own beliefs were driven above all by his experience as a Central European Jew and by his exposure to early manifestations of the Zionist movement, which led him to dream of a kind of post-Zionist universalism embracing all creeds and races. Sadly, this was not to be: he could not put an end to anti-Semitism, nor bring about the kind of ecumenism of which he dreamed. That vision was lost in the rise of nationalism in World War I and beyond.
Keywords: Esperanto, universalism, Zamenhof, language and cities, anti-Semitism
Published online: 12 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.40.1.06ton
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Alcalde, Javier
2018.  In Language Policy and Linguistic Justice, ► pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Appiah, K.
(2006) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Archibugi, D.
(2007) The language of democracy: Vernacular or Esperanto? A comparison of the multiculturalist and cosmopolitan perspectives. In C. Rumford (Ed.), Cosmopolitanism and Europe (pp. 142–157). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Auld, W.
(Ed.) (1984) Esperanta antologio 1887-1981. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Barth, G.
(1980) City people: The rise of modern city culture in nineteenth-century America. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U.
(2006) The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T.
(1966) The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth and Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, P.
(2003) The anti-semitic moment: A tour of France in 1898. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blahuš, M.
(2012) Cifereca prilaboro de la Zamenhofaj adresaroj. In D. Blanke (Ed.), Pioniroj de la Internacia Lingvo (pp. 55–60). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Blanke, D.
(2009) Causes of the relative success of Esperanto. Language Problems and Language Planning, 33(3), 251–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, M.
(1960) Zamenhof, creator of Esperanto. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Boyer, M.C.
(1994) The city of collective memory: Its historical imagery and architectural entertainments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eco, U.
(1995) The search for the perfect language, trans. J. Fentress. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, P.
(1996) Reading Berlin 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garvía, R.
(2013) Religion and artificial languages at the turn of the 20th century: Ostwald and Zamenhof. Language Problems and Language Planning, 37(1), 47–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Esperanto and its rivals: The struggle for an international language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geppert, A. (2010) Fleeting cities. Imperial expositions in fin-de-siècle Europe. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gobbo, F.
(2009) Fondamenti di interlinguistics ed esperantologia: Pianificazione linguistica e lingue pianificate. Milano: Cortina.Google Scholar
Gordin, M.
(2015) Scientific Babel: How science was done before and after global English. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gubbins, P.
(1999) Majstra muzikado: Berlino en romanoj de Varankin kaj Schwartz. In V. Benczik (Ed.), Lingva arto: Jubilea libro omaĝe al William Auld kaj Marjorie Boulton (pp. 61–69). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
(2006) Kaj en ondoj dronas ankaŭ verda stelo: W. T. Stead kaj ni. British Esperantist, Spring, 26–35.Google Scholar
Harper, T.N.
(2002) Empire, diaspora, and the languages of globalism 1850-1914. In A.G. Hopkins (Ed.), Globalization in world history (pp. 141–166). New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Kim, Young Soo
(1999) Esperanto and global identity. In J. Boli and G.M. Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture (pp. 127–148). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiselman, C.
(2010) Hilelismo, homaranismo kaj neŭtrale-homa religio. In D. Blanke and U. Lins (Eds.), La arto labori kune (pp. 401–414). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2009) Religiaj kaj filozofiaj ideoj de Zamenhof: Kultura kaj socia fono. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Korĵenkov, A.
(2011) Homarano: La vivo, verkoj kaj ideoj de d-ro L. L. Zamenhof (2nd ed.). Kaliningrad: Sezonoj / Kaunas: Litova Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Korzhenkov, A.
(2010) Zamenhof: The Life, Works and Ideas of the Author of Esperanto, trans. I. Richmond. New York: Mondial.Google Scholar
Künzli, A.
(2010) L. L. Zamenhof (1859-1917): Esperanto, Hillelismus (Homaranismus) und die “jüdische Frage” in Ost- und Westeuropa. Wiesbaden, Germany: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lins, U.
(2008) Esperanto as language and idea in China and Japan. Language Problems and Language Planning, 32(1), 47–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lo Bianco, J.
(2004) Invented languages and new worlds. English Today, 20(2), 8–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maimon, N.Z.
(1978) La kaŝita vivo de Zamenhof. Tokyo: Japana Esperanto-Instituto.Google Scholar
Mazower, M.
(2012) Governing the world: The history of an idea, 1815 to the present. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Müller-Saini, G., & Benton, G.
(2006) Esperanto and Chinese anarchism 1907-1920: The translation from diaspora to homeland. Language Problems and Language Planning, 30, 45–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Esperanto and Chinese anarchism in the 1920s and 1930s. Language Problems and Language Planning, 30, 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, K.
(2010) “The new bilingualism”: Cosmopolitanism in the era of Esperanto. In J. Wilson, C. Şandru and S. Lawson Welsh (Eds.), Rerouting the postcolonial: New directions for a new millennium (pp. 48–59). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Okrent, A.
(2009) In the land of invented languages. New York: Spiegel & Grau.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, J., & Petersson, N.
(2005) Globalization: A short history. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Privat, E.
(1931) The Life of Zamenhof, trans. R. Eliott. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, K.
(2012) Small city on a big couch. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Romaniuk, Z., & Wiśniewski, T.
(2009) Ĉio komenciĝis ĉe la Verda. Pri Ludoviko Zamenhof, lia familio kaj la komenco de Esperanto / Zaczęło się na Zielonej. O Ludowiku Zamenhofie, jego rodzinie i początkach esperanta. Łódź, Poland: Księż Młyn.Google Scholar
Rossi, P.
(2000) Logic and the art of memory: The quest for a universal language, trans. S. Clucas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schor, E.
(2009) Esperanto: A Jewish story. Pakn Treger: The Magazine of the National Yiddish Book Center, 60, 16–23.Google Scholar
(2010) Zamenhof and the shadow people. Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(2), 183–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Zamenhof and the liberal/communitarian debate. Language Problems and Language Planning, 39(3), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sikosek, Z.
(2005) Sed homoj kun homoj. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Simon, S.
(2012) Cities in translation: Intersections of language and memory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stillman, R.
(1995) The new philosophy and universal languages in seventeenth-century England: Bacon, Hobbes, and Wilkins. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press; London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Tanner, T.
(1971) City of words: American fiction 1950-1970. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Tauli, V.
(1968) Introduction to a theory of language planning. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Tonkin, H.
(2002a)  La Espero: Esperanto-poetoj pri Esperanto. In R. McCoy (Ed.), Internacia Kongresa Universitato, Fortalezo, Brazilo 3-10 aŭgusto 2002 (pp. 46–67). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
(2002b) The role of literary language in Esperanto. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Planned languages: From concept to reality (pp. 11–35). Brussels: Hogeschool voor Wetenschap en Kunst.Google Scholar
(2012) Movado aŭ kulturo? La ideologia bazo de la Esperanto-poezio. In R. McCoy (Ed.), Internacia Kongresa Universitato, Hanojo, Vjetnamio 28 julio-4 aŭgusto 2012 (pp. 44–56). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
(2014) Planning the Past in Language Planning. A’dam Multiling (Amsterdam Working Papers in Multilingualism), 1(1), 6–15.Google Scholar
(2015) Language planning and planned languages: How can planned languages inform language planning? INDECS: Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 12, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Z.
(2012) Historio de UEA. Partizánske, Slovakia: Espero.Google Scholar
Zamenhof, L.L.
(1907) Esperanto and Jewish ideals: Interview for the Jewish Chronicle with Dr. Zamenhof. Jewish Chronicle (6 September), 16–18.Google Scholar
(1929) Originala verkaro, ed. J. Dietterle. Leipzig: Ferdinand Hirt.Google Scholar
(1961) Proverbaro esperanta. La Laguna: Régulo.Google Scholar
Żelazny, W.
(2012) Ludwik Zamenhof: Życie I dzieło, Recepcja I reminiscencje, Wybór pism I listów. Kraków: NOMOS.Google Scholar