Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 40:2 (2016) ► pp. 121–145

The Latvian referendum on Russian as a second state language, February 2012

| University of Latvia
| University of Western Sydney
On 18 February 2012 Latvian citizens participated in a referendum on making Russian a second official (“state”) language. The proposal was rejected by three-quarters of voters. There is a complex background to language policy in Latvia, where since regaining independence in 1991 the country has promoted Latvian as the only state language, though Russian and other languages are widely used at a societal level. The language law and associated citizenship law in Latvia (as in Estonia) have received considerable commentary, with recent significant writings disagreeing strongly regarding their interpretation. These laws have also very often been criticized by both European institutions and by Russia, yet are tenaciously clung to as a basis of Latvian sovereignty. Proficiency in Latvian among previous non-speakers of this language has improved markedly since regained independence, and generally there has been little interpersonal or community confict over language. The move for a referendum, promoted by Russian groups of a highly political character, and with a particular discourse about Latvia and language, brings a new phase to an ongoing language policy issue. Subsequent events both in Latvia (in the form of a constitutional amendment) and in Ukraine (in the form of both language law and armed conflict) show language policy being increasingly influenced by wider political forces.
Keywords: Russian language, Latvian language, Latvia, Latvian Language Referendum 2012
Published online: 04 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.40.2.01dru
References
Agarin, T
2010 A Cat‘s Lick. Democratisation and Minority Communites in the Post-Soviet Baltic. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Agustsson, A
(2011) Framed peoples: The discourse of minority elites and the language question in Ukraine. Slovo, 23(2), 80–94.Google Scholar
Alksnis, V
(1991) Suffering from self-determination. Foreign Policy, 841, 61–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balodis, R
(2014) Konstitūcijas sastāvdaļa – preambula: tās loma un nozīme mūsdienu konstitucionālismā/ [The Preamble to the Constitution: its role and importance in modern constitutionalism.] In University of Latvia Proceedings of 72nd Scientific Conference (pp. 295–311). Riga: University of Latvia,.
Baltic Institute of Social Sciences
2008 Language. Report March-April 2008. Retrieved from http://​www​.biss​.soc​.lv​/?lang​=en​&category​=resurss​&id​=2006​-2008.Google Scholar
Bildt, C
(1994) The Baltic litmus test. Foreign Affairs, 73(5), 72–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bratt Paulston, C., Szidonia Haragos, V.L. & Martelle, W
(2007) Some thoughts on extrinsic linguistic minorities. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(5), 385–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruthiaux, P
(2009) Language rights in historical and contemporary perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(1), 73–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budryte, D
(2005) Taming Nationalism? Political Community Building in the Post-Soviet Baltic States. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Deets, S
(2002) Reconsidering East European minority policy: liberal theory and European norms. East European Politics and Societies, 16(1), 30–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Varennes, F
(1995/6) The protection of linguistic minorities in Europe and human rights: possible solutions to ethnic conflicts? Columbia Journal of European Law, 2(1), 107–143.Google Scholar
Druviete, I
(1997) Linguistic Human rights in the Baltic States. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1271, 161–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Latvian language as the state language: As a symbol, as a form of communication, or the foundation for statehood? In A. Cimdina & D. Hanovs (Eds), Latvia and Latvians. A People and a State in Ideas, Images and Symbols (pp. 145–182). Riga: Zinātne.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R
(2001) Minority language rights in international law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 501, 90–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grigas, A
(2012) Legacies, Coercion and Soft Power: Russian Influence in the Baltic States. Retrieved from http://​www​.chathamhouse​.org​/publications​/papers​/view​/185321 (4 November, 2012).
Hogan-Brun, G
(2006) At the interface of language ideology and practice: The public discourse surrounding the 2004 education reform in Latvia. Language Policy, 5(2), 313–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogan-Brun, G., Ozolins, U., Ramoniene, M. & Rannut, M
(2007) Language politics and practices in the Baltic States. Current Issues in Language Planning, 8(4), 469–631. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarinovska K
(2013) Popular initiatives as means of altering the core of the Republic of Latvia. Juridica International Law Review, XX1, 152–159. Retrieved from http://​www​.juridicainternational​.eu​/public​/pdf​/ji​_2013​_1​_152​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jubulis, M
(2001) Nationalism and democratic transition: The politics of citizenship and language in post-Soviet Latvia. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Latvia. Latvian Language Agency [Latviešu valodas aģentūra
] (2011) Valodas situācija Latvijā 2004-2010 [The Language Situation in Latvia 2004-2010]. The Agency.Google Scholar
Latvia. State Language Commission
(2008) Break-out of Latvian. A Sociolinguistic Study of Situation, Attitudes, Processes, and Tendencies. Riga: Zinātne.Google Scholar
Levits E
(2013) Izvērstas Satversmes preambulas iespējamā teksta piedāvājums un komentārs. [Draft of possible text of a Constitutional Preamble and commentary] Jurista Vārds, 39(790), 8–19.Google Scholar
Loeber, D.A
(1993) Language rights in independent Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, 1918–1940. In S. Vilfan (Ed.), Ethnic Groups and Language Rights (pp. 221–249). Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Maurais, J
(Ed.) (1998) Les Politiques Linguistiques des Pays baltes. Special number of Terminogramme. Quebec: Office de la langue française.Google Scholar
Ozolins, U
(1999) Between Russian and European hegemony: Current language policy in the Baltic States. Current Issues in Language and Society, 6(1), 6–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The impact of European accession upon language policy in the Baltic States. Language Policy, 2(3), 217–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A
(2011) Language rights versus speakers’ rights: on the applicability of Western language rights approaches in Eastern European contexts. Language Policy, 10(1), 37–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pētersone, K
(2012) Latvia: The Hot Month of February. Retrieved from http://​baltic​-review​.com​/2012​/02​/latvia​-the​-hot​-month​-of​-february/
Pleps, J
(2014) The fundamental values of the Latvian constitutional order: some thoughts about the intentions of the constitutional legislator. Retrieved from http://​constitutional​-change​.com​/the​-fundamental​-values​-of​-the​-latvian​-constitutional​-order​-some​-thoughts​-about​-the​-intentions​-of​-the​-constitutional​-legislator/
Poriņa, V
(2009) Valsts valoda daudzvalodīgajā sabiedrībā [The State Language in Multilingual Society]. Riga: Latvian Language Institute, University of Latvia. (English summary, pp. 183–6).Google Scholar
Račevskis, K
(2002) Towards a postcolonial perspective on the Baltic States. Journal of Baltic Studies, 33(1), 37–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramishvili, T
(1998) Latvia and Estonia: Human rights violations in the center of Europe. International Affairs, 44(4), 116–127.Google Scholar
Rannut, M
(1994) Beyond linguistic policy: the Soviet Union versus Estonia. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & R. Phillipson (Eds), Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination (pp. 179–208). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Romanov, A
(2000) The Russian diaspora in Latvia and Estonia: predicting language outcomes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(1), 8–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, C
(2008) Ethnicity and language tensions in Latvia. Language Policy, 7(1), 3–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L
(2007) Linguistic human rights and mobility. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(4), 325–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaagman, R
(1999) Conflict Prevention in the Baltic States: The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Flensburg: ECMI [European Centre for Minority issues], Monograph #1.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Cyuńczyk, Filip
2020. Instrumentalization of Law in the Context of Memory Policies in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej ► pp. 40 ff. Crossref logo
Cyuńczyk, Filip
2021. Powrót do przeszłości? O przemianach prawnych mechanizmów regulacji pamięci zbiorowej w Hiszpanii z perspektywy Europy Środkowej. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej ► pp. 22 ff. Crossref logo
Kamińska-Korolczuk, Katarzyna
2017. Wpływ mniejszości narodowych zamieszkujących Estonię i Łotwę na rozwój systemów medialnych państw pobytu. Cywilizacja i Polityka 15:15 ► pp. 375 ff. Crossref logo
Lazdiņa, Sanita & Heiko F. Marten
2019.  In Multilingualism in the Baltic States, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Németh, Ádám
2021. Territorial and non-territorial arrangements in a multi-ethno-linguistic context. Language Problems and Language Planning 45:2 ► pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo
Ozolins, Uldis
2019.  In Multilingualism in the Baltic States, ► pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Veisbergs, Andrejs
2018.  In Language Planning in the Post-Communist Era, ► pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.