Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 40:3 (2016) ► pp.250–268

Linguistic accommodations and electoral participation

A comparative analysis

| Northern Kentucky University
| Northern Kentucky University

The purpose of this study was to advance the understanding of the influence geo-political events and legislation can have on the accommodation of minority language voters. Particularly, this study focused on the effects of (1) the Voting Rights Act of 1965 on minority language voters in the USA, and (2) World War I on minority language voters in Austria. We use a most similar systems design with our case studies. The results from the most similar systems design suggest that while both the USA and Austria have similar constitutional structures, are stable democracies, and have laws enacted to help protect the rights of minority language speakers (the VRA of 1965 in the USA, and Art. 8 of the Austrian State Treaty of 1955), they have developed two different approaches to linguistic accommodation for minority language speakers at elections. This study has helped to further the researchers’ understanding of the influence geo-political events and legislation can have on the accommodation of minority language voters.

Keywords: minority language speakers, Voting Rights Act 1965, World War One, accommodation, USA, Austria
Published online: 15 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.40.3.03rei
References
Abdelall, B.F
(2004) Not enough of a minority: Arab Americans and the language assistance provisions (Section 203) of the Voting Rights Act. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 38, 4, 911–940.Google Scholar
Ancheta, A
(2010) Language assistance and local voting rights law. Indiana Law Review, 44, 161, 161–199.Google Scholar
Austrian Constitution
(2011) Legislationline Website, URL: [URL]. (Accessed January 11, 2014).
Berezin, M
(2006) Xenophobia and the new nationalisms. In G. Delanty and K. Krishan (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalisms (pp. 273–284). London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, F.S., & Berry, W
(1990) State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 2, 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, W., & Baybeck, B
(2005) Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition. American Political Science Review, 99, 4, 505–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, A
(2005) Discourse and power in a multilingual world. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, T. & Markman, S
(1983) The 1982 amendments to the Voting Rights Act: A legislative history. Washington and Lee Law Review, 40, 4, 1347–1428.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. & Campbell, D
(1976) Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Brockhaus, F.A
(1955) Der Grosse Brockhaus, vol. 81. Wiesbaden. Halbleder Zustand: leichte Gebrauchsspuren.Google Scholar
Bureau of the Census
(2000) U.S. Department of Commerce, Current Population Reports, Voting and Registration by Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin, for States: November 2000, Tbl 4b. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. & LeVine, R
(1968) Ethnocentrism and intergroup relations. In R. Abelson (Ed.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 551–564). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Combs, A
(2006) Being and becoming: A field approach to psychology. New York, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Crain, R
(1966) Fluoridation: Diffusion of an innovation among cities. Social Forces, 44, 4, 467–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, K
(2014) States, debt, and power: ‘Saints’ and ‘sinners’ in European history and integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
“FPÖ Wirbt Mit “Heimatliebe Statt Marokkaner-Diebe,“
(2012) Die Welt Website, URL: [URL] (Accessed May 2, 2014).
“Fünfzig Kronen,“
(2014) Geldschein.at Website, URL: [URL] (Accessed October 1, 2014).
Gray, V
(1973) Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 671, 1174–1185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gully, J
(2011) Bilingual signs in Carinthia: International treaties, the Ortstafelstreit, and the spaces of German transit. URL: [URL] (Accessed May 1, 2014).
Hiesel, M
(2010) Der Kärntner Ortstafelstreit. Europäisches Journal Für Minderheitenfragen, 3-41, 167–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, N
(2002) Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. Language Policy, 11, 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber-Bachmann, E., Schöberl, C., & Schönauer, A
(2013) Statistics Austria. Vienna: Aichfelder Druck GesmbH.Google Scholar
Jelavich, B
(1987) Modern Austria: Empire and republic, 1815-1986. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kann, R
(1980) A history of the Habsburg empire, 1526-1918. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Geschichte Des Habsburgerreiches 1526 Bis 1918. Vienna and Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Kinder, D
(2003) Belief systems after converse. In M. MacKuen and G. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Electoral democracy (pp. 13–47). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Koenigsberg, R
(2009) Nations have the right to kill: Hitler, the Holocaust, and war. New York: Library of Social Science.Google Scholar
Luebke, F
(1980) Legal restrictions on foreign languages in the Great Plains states, 1917-1923. In P. Schach (Ed.), Languages in conflict: Linguistic acculturation on the Great Plains (pp. 1–19). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Mason, J
(2014) The dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian empire, 1867-1918. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, S
(2000) Accommodating and resisting minority language policy: The case of Wales. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 3, 2, 101–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Niesen, P
(2004) Kunstfreiheit und Kunstzerstörung. In G. Frankenberg and P. Niesen (Eds.), Bilderverbot: Recht, Ethik Und Ästhetik Der öffentlichen Darstellung (pp.150–169). Münster: Lit Verlag Münster.Google Scholar
Patten, A
(2001) Political theory and language policy. Political Theory, 29, 5, 691–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A
(2002) We have room for but one language here: Language and national identity in the US at the Turn of the 20th Century. Multilingua, 21, 2-3, 163–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Introduction: Bilingualism and thought in the 20th century. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 1–28). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Powell, J
(2009) Encyclopedia of north American immigration. New York: Infobase Publishing.Google Scholar
Republik Österreich Parliament
(2014) “Nationalrat,” Republik Österreich Parliament Website, URL: [URL] (Accessed November 30, 2014).
Roshwald, A
(2001) Ethnic nationalism and the fall of empires: Central Europe, Russia & the Middle East, 1914-1923. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schorkopf, M., Joshi, S., & Friedrich, M
(2013) Kinderpsychiatrische Interventionen in Der Schule: Diagnostik, Beratung Und Behandlung. In G. Lehmkuhl, F. Poustka, M. Holtmann and H. Steiner (Eds.), Lehrbuch Der Kinder- Und Jugendpsychiatrie: Grundlagen Und Störungsbilder (pp. 1434–1458). Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & KG.Google Scholar
“Second Report by the Republic of Austria Pursuant to Art. 15, Paragraph 1 of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages,”
(2007) Bundeskanzleramt Österreich Website, URL: [URL] (Accessed April 27, 2014).
Shipan, C. & Volden, C
(2008) The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 4, 840–857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B., Dobbin, F. & Garrett, G
(2006) Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60, 4, 781–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith-Williams, H
(1908) Germanic empires. A history of the Habsburg empire, 1526-1918. London: Hooper & Jackson.Google Scholar
Sumner, W
(1906) Folkways. New York: Ginn Custom Publishing.Google Scholar
Taras, R
(2012) Xenophobia and Islamophobia in Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Triandis, H
(1990) Theoretical concepts that are applicable to the analysis of ethnocentrism. In R. Brislin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 34–55). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tucker, J.T
(2013) “Statement of Dr. James Thomas Tucker before the Presidential Commission on Election Administration Barriers to Language Minority Voters and How to Overcome Them, August 8, 2013.” Supportthevoter.gov Website. URL: [URL] (Accessed March 25, 2014).
Vouk, R
(2004) Der Anlassfall. In M. Pandel, M. Polzer, M. Polzersrienz, and R. Vospernik (Eds.), Ortstafelkonflikt in Kärnten – Krise Oder Chance (pp.79–102). Vienna: Braunmüller Verlag.Google Scholar
Walker, J
(1969) The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 3, 880–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wawro, G
(1997) The Austro-Prussian War: Austria’s war with Prussia and Italy in 1866. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, S. & Mcilraith, J
(1906) Austria. London: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Wiley, T
(1998) The imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in north America. In T. Ricento and B. Burnaby (Eds.), Language and politics in the US and Canada: Myths and realities (pp. 211–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wright, S
(2003) Language policy and language planning: From nationalism to globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Barber, Michael, David Gordon, Ryan Hill & Joseph Price
2017. Status Quo Bias in Ballot Wording. Journal of Experimental Political Science 4:2 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.