Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 41:2 (2017) ► pp. 103114
References

References

Barreto, A. A.
(2001) The politics of language in Puerto Rico. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
Crawford, J.
(2000) At war with diversity: U.S. language policy in an age of anxiety. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dookhan, I.
(1994) A history of the Virgin Islands of the United States. Kingston, Jamaica: Canoe Press.
Faingold, E. D.
(2004) Language rights and language justice in the constitutions of the world. Language Problems and Language Planning, 28, 11–24. Crossref link
(2007) Language rights in the 2004 draft of the European Union Constitution. Language Problems and Language Planning, 31, 25–36. Crossref link
(2012a) Language rights in the United States Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In P. C. Miller, J. L. Watzke and M. Montero (Eds.), Readings in language studies, volume 3: Language and identity (pp. 447–457). Grandville, MI: International Society for Language Studies.
(2012b) Official English in the constitutions and statutes of the fifty states in the United States. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36, 136–148. Crossref link
(2013) Official English in the constitutions and legislative statutes of the 50 states in the United States. Presented at the 19th International Congress of Linguists. Geneva, Switzerland. July 22–27.
(2014) Language rights for Mexican Americans and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. In P. C. Miller, J. L. Watzke and M. Montero (Eds.), Readings in language studies, volume 4: Language and social justice (pp. 271–281). Grandville, MI: International Society for Language Studies.
(2015) Language rights in the European Union and the Treaty of Lisbon. Language Problems and Language Planning, 39, 33–49. Crossref link
(2016a) Language rights for minorities and the right to code-switch in the United States. In P. C. Miller, B. G. Rubrecht, E. A. Mikulec and C. T. McGivern (Eds.), Readings in language studies, volume 6: A critical examination of language and community (pp. 1–13). Grandville, MI: International Society for Language Studies.
(2016b) Language rights in Catalonia and the constitutional right to secede from Spain. Language Problems and Language Planning, 40, 146–162. Crossref link
Grabowski, J. F. & Grabowski, P. A.
(1992) U.S. Territories and Possessions. New York, NY: Chelsea House Publishers.
Leibowitz, A. H.
(1989) Defining status: A comprehensive analysis of U.S. territorial policy. Dordrech: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
McKay, S. & Hornberger, N.
(1996) Sociolinguistics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phillipson, R.
(2003) English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. New York: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. & Skutnabb-Kangas, T.
(1996) English-only worldwide or language ecology. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 429–452. Crossref link
Shaffer, J. R.
(2000) American Sāmoa: 100 years under the United States flag. Honolulu: Island Heritage Publishing.
Shohamy, E. G.
(2006) Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York: Routledge. Crossref link
Tully, J.
(1995) Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Turi, G.
(1994) Typology of language legislation. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas and R. Phillipson (Eds.), Linguistic human rights: Overcoming linguistic discrimination (pp. 111–119). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Varennes, F. de
(1996) Language, minorities and human rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Willens, H. P., & Siemer, D. C.
(2002) An honorable accord: The covenant between the Northern Mariana Islands and the United States. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Faingold, Eduardo D.
2018. Language rights in the United States island territory of Guam. Language Problems and Language Planning 42:2  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 january 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.