Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 41:2 (2017) ► pp. 115–135

Compulsory African language learning at a South African university

An exploration of macro- and micro dynamics

| University of Leipzig/KwaZulu-Natal
While many universities in the world are making provisions to include the English language in their institutional structure, the South African University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) is opposing the hegemony of English in its institution. The University has launched a language policy and planning (LPP) strategy that makes provisions first to incorporate the vernacular language Zulu as language of learning and teaching, and second, to promote it as a subject. In this vein, the institution recently made an unprecedented decision for the South African higher education system. Since the first semester of 2014, a specific Zulu language module is a mandatory subject for undergraduate students who have no proficiency in the language. Although considered a watershed moment among many African language promoters, the mandatory ruling is fiercely discussed and debated in the institution and beyond. Theoretically grounded in Language Management Theory (LMT) and empirically based on semi-ethnographic fieldwork, this article examines the interplay between macro and micro language dynamics at UKZN in the context of the mandatory Zulu module. In juxtaposing interview discourses of language policy stakeholders with those of Zulu lecturers, the study reveals a stark discrepancy between macro and micro language management at this university. The article argues that this mismatch between the language policy intents and actual practices on the ground is symptomatic for South Africa’s language policy in education being shaped more by ideological interests than by pedagogical regards.
Keywords: higher education language policy, South African education, Zulu
Published online: 27 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.41.2.03rud
Bibliography

Bibliography

Ager, D.
(2001) Motivation in language planning and language policy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Alexander, N.
(1989) Language policy and national unity in South Africa/Azania. Cape Town: Buchu Books.Google Scholar
(1993) South Africa: Harmonising Nguni and Sotho. In N. Crawhall (Ed.), Democratically speaking: International perspectives on language planning (pp. 56–68). Cape Town: National Language Project.Google Scholar
(2004) The politics of language planning in post-apartheid in South Africa. Language Problems and Language Planning, 28(2), 113–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alidou, H.
(2003) Language policies and language education in Francophone Africa: A critique and a call to action. In S. Makoni, G. Smitherman, A. F. Ball, and A. K. Spears (Eds.), Black Linguistics (pp. 103–116). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, A.
(1991) Language and the nation: The language question in sub-Saharan Africa. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Language and the African renaissance: Lessons from the South African experience. In H. E. Wolff (Ed.), Tied tongues (pp. 39–60). Münster: LiT Verlag.Google Scholar
Banda, F.
(2015) Language policy and orthographic harmonization across linguistic, ethnic and national boundaries in Southern Africa. Language Policy: Crossref.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(2010) Sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, N.
(2013) Student responses to being taught physics in isiZulu. South African Journal of Science, 109(9/10), 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, N., & Merrett, C.
(2014) The struggle for the soul of a South African university. Printed Manuscript.Google Scholar
Cobarrubias, J.
(1983) Ethical issues in status planning. In J. Cobarrubias and J. Fishman (Eds), Progress in language planning. International perspectives (pp. 41–86). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Djité, P.
(2008) The Sociolinguistics of development in Africa. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, T.
(2006) From monolingual to bilingual higher education: The repositioning of historically Afrikaans-medium universities in South Africa. Language Policy, 5(1), 87–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P.
(2015) Social linguistics and literacies. Ideology in discourse. London/ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gumede, W.
(2012) Rising tribalism in South Africa. In Pambazuka News. Retrieved August 3, 2015 from http://​www​.pambazuka​.net​/en​/category​.php​/features​/82016
Hartshorne, K. B.
(1992) Crisis and challenge: Black education 1910–1990. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, M. & Hachimi, A.
(2013) Talking class, talking race: language, class, and race in the call center industry in South Africa. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(6), 551–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jernudd, B. H. & Neustupny, J. V.
(1987) Language planning: For whom? In L. Laforge (Ed.) Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Language Planning (pp. 69–84). Quebec: Les Presses de l’Universite LavalGoogle Scholar
Jernudd, B. H.
(2002) Managing languages at bilingual universities: Relationships between universities and their language environment. In Li Wei, J-M. Dewaele and A. Housen (Eds), Opportunities and challenges of bilingualism (pp. 297–310). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. C.
(2004) Language policy discourse and bilingual language planning. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 19(2), 73–97.Google Scholar
Kamwangamalu, N.
(2010) Vernacularization, globalization and language economics in non-English speaking countries in Africa. Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kashula, R. H.
(2011) Masincokole! Talk to me. Retrieved September 10, 2014 from http://​mg​.co​.za​/article​/2011​-04​-21​-masincokole​-talk​-to​-me
Khumalo, L.
(2015) Semi-automatic term extraction for an isiZulu linguistic terms dictionary. Lexikos, 25, 495–506.Google Scholar
Kuo, E. C. Y., & Jernudd, B. H.
(1993) Balancing macro- and micro-sociolinguistic perspectives in language management: The case of Singapore. Language Problems and Language Planning, 17, 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lafon, M.
(2008)  Asikhulume! African languages for all, a powerful strategy for spearheading trasnformation and improvement of the South African education system. IFAS Working Paper Series, 11, 35–59.Google Scholar
(2010) Promoting social cum racial integration in South Africa by making an African language a National Senior Certificate Pass requirement. Alternation, 17(1), 417–442.Google Scholar
Madiba, M.
(2005) Integration and national identity in South Africa: A dilemma for linguistic minorities. In R. Finlayson and S. Slabbert (Eds.), Language and identities in a postcolony Southern African perspective (pp. 175–194). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Makoni, S.
(2003) From misinvention to disinvention of language: Multilingualism and the South African constitution. In S. Makoni, G. Smitherman, A. F. Ball and A. K. Spears (Eds.), Black linguistics (pp. 132–151). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mwaniki, M.
(2011) Language management in Africa: The dialectics of theory and practice. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 29(3), 243–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, J.
(2006) From language planning to language management. Sociolinguistica: International Yearbook of European Sociolinguistics, 20, 92–104.Google Scholar
(2009) The integrative potential of Language Management Theory. In J. Nekvapil, and T. Sherman (Eds.), Language management in contact situations (pp. 1–11). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Nekvapil, J., & T. Sherman
(2015) An introduction: Language Management Theory in language policy and planning. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 232, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neustupny, J. V.
(1978) Outline of a theory of language problems. In J. V. Neustupny (Ed.), Post-structural approaches to language: language theory in a Japanese context (pp. 243–257). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
(1994) Problems of English contact discourse and language planning. In T. Kandiah and J. Kwan-Terry (Eds.), English and language planning (pp. 50–69). Singapore: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nkosi, P. Z.
(2013) Postgraduate students’ experiences and attitudes towards isiZulu as a medium of instruction at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. Postgraduate students’ experiences and attitudes towards isiZulu as a medium of instruction at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. Current Issues in Language Planning, Crossref.Google Scholar
Orman, J.
(2013) Book review: Munene Mwaniki: Language Planning in South Africa: Towards a Language Management Approach. Language Policy, 12(4), 359–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pan South African Language Board (PanSALB)
(2013) PanSALB website. Retrieved July 23, 2013 from http://​www​.pansalb​.org​.za​/pansalbhistory​.html
Posel, D., & Zeller, J.
(2015) Language shift or increased bilingualism in South Africa? Evidence from census data. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Probyn, M.
(2014) Pedagogical translanguaging: Bridging discourses in South African science classrooms. Language and Education, 29(3), 218–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramanathan, V.
(2011) Researching-Texting Tensions in Qualitative Research: Ethics in and around Textual Fidelity, Selectivity. In T. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and Language Policy (pp. 255–270). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reagan, T.
(2001) The promotion of linguistic diversity in multilingual settings: Policy and reality in post-apartheid South Africa. Language Problems and Language Planning, 25(1), 51–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roy-Campbell, Z. M.
(2003) Promoting African languages as conveyors of knowledge in educational institutions. In S. Makoni, G. Smitherman, A. F. Ball and A. K. Spears (Eds.), Black linguistics (pp. 83–102). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S.
(2014) Ethnolinguistic dynamics in two young democracies: A comparison of language stigmas. In H. Horakova and S. Rudwick (Eds.) Global challenges and local reactions: Czech Republic and South Africa. Berlin: LiT Verlag.Google Scholar
Sherman, T.
(2015) Behaving toward language in the Mormon mission: The Czech case. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 232, 33–57.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E.
(2006) Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B.
(2009) Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, N. S.
(2012) African languages as compulsory courses in KwaZulu-Natal: Illusory initiative or inspired intervention? Per Linguam, 28(2), 26–47.Google Scholar
Webb, V.
(2004) African languages as media of instruction in South Africa. Language Problems and Language Planning, 28(2), 147–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, H. E.
(2003) The vision of the African renaissance. In H. E. Wolff (Ed.), Tied tongues (pp. 1–20). Münster: LiT Verlag,Google Scholar
(2010) The African predicament and the ‘language factor’: Unidentified, under-researched, underrated. In A. O. Agwuele, U. M. Nwankwo and O. Akinwumi (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on overcoming the African predicament (pp. 348–361). Berlin: Mediateam IT Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Ndebele, Hloniphani
2020. Exploring the challenges of information and communication technology localization in South African higher education: a language management approach. International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Posel, Dorrit, Mark Hunter & Stephanie Rudwick
2020. Revisiting the prevalence of English: language use outside the home in South Africa. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sherman, Tamah
2020.  In A Language Management Approach to Language Problems [Studies in World Language Problems, 7], ► pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.