Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 41:2 (2017) ► pp. 136158
References

References

Adam, R.
(2015) Standardization of Sign Languages. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 432–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, R., & Kaplan, R.
(2003) Who are the actors? The role of (applied) linguists in language policy. In P. Ryan & R. Terborg (Eds.), Language: Issues of Inequality (pp. 19–40). Mexico City: CELE/ Autonomous National University of Mexico.Google Scholar
Batterbury, S., Ladd, P., & Gulliver, M.
(2007) Sign Language Peoples as indigenous minorities: implications for research and policy. Environment and Planning, 39, 2899–2915. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickford, J. A., Lewis, M. P., & Simons, G. F.
(2014) Rating the vitality of sign languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(5), 513–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, A., & Emery, S.
(2014) The Case for Deaf Legal Theory Through the Lens of Deaf Gain. In H. -D. L. Bauman & J. J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity (pp. 37–62). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Committee on the Icelandic Sign Language
(2015) Report of the Committee on Icelandic Sign Language. 7 June 2015. Retrieved from http://​www​.arnastofnun​.is​/solofile​/1017031
Conama, J. B.
(2013) Situating the socio-economic position of the Irish Deaf community in the equality framework. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: an International Journal, 32(2), 173–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deaf Sector Partnership
(2015) Scottish Government announces plans to recruit Deaf BSL users to the British Sign Language (BSL) National Advisory Group (NAG) [Press release]. Retrieved from https://​www​.bda​.org​.uk​/news​/bsl​-nag
de Bres, J.
(2015) The hierarchy of minority languages in New Zealand. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(7), 677–693. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Meulder, M.
(2012) Het decreet houdende de erkenning van de Vlaamse Gebarentaal: een evaluatie [The decree on the recognition of the Flemish Sign Language: an evaluation]. In G. De Clerck & R. Pinxten (Eds.), Gebarentaal zegt alles (pp. 56–70). Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
(2016) Promotion in Times of Endangerment: the Sign Language Act in Finland. Language Policy, 16(2), 189–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015a): Sign language recognition: tensions between specificity and universalism in international deaf discourses. In A. Kusters & M. Friedner (Eds.), It’s Small World. Inquiries into International Deaf Spaces (pp. 160–172). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(2015b) The Legal Recognition of Sign Languages. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 498–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015c) A Barking Dog That Never Bites?: The British Sign Language (Scotland) Bill. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 446–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) The influence of deaf people’s dual category status on sign language: The British Sign Langauage (Scotland) Act (2015). Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(2), 215–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R.
(2006) Is There a Duty to Legislate for Linguistic Minorities? Journal of Law and Society, 33(1), 181–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eichmann, H.
(2009) Planning sign languages: promoting hearing hegemony? Conceptualizing sign language standardization. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10(3), 293–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emery, S.
(2011) Citizenship and the Deaf Community. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Erlenkamp, S., Gjøen, S., Haualand, H., Kvitvær, H. B., Peterson, P. R., Schrøder, O., & Vonen, A. M.
(2007) Begrunnelser for å gjøre norsk tegnspråk til offisielt språk [Reasons for making Norwegian Sign Language an official language]. Norges Døveforbund.Google Scholar
European Union of the Deaf
(2011) Sign Languages’ status under threat in Denmark and the Netherlands? [Press release]. Retrieved from http://​www​.eud​.eu​/news​/wfd​-eud​-press​-release/
Fishman, J.
(1991) Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Geraci, C.
(2012) Language Policy and Planning: The Case of Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 12(4), 494–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D., Looney, D., & Lusin, N.
(2015) Enrollment in Languages Other Than English in United States Institutions of Higher Education Fall 2013. Retrieved from Modern Language Association website: https://​apps​.mla​.org​/pdf​/2013​_enrollment​_survey​.pdf
Hauser, P., & Kartheiser, G.
(2014) The Advantages of Learning a Sign Language. In H. -D. L. Bauman & J. J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity (pp. 133–145). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hoyer, K.
(2004) The Sociolinguistic Situation of Finland-Swedish Deaf People and Their Language, Finland-Swedish Sign Language. In M. Van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities (Vol. 10, pp. 3–23). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Human Rights Commission
(2013) A New Era in the Right to Sign: He Houhanga Rongo te Tika ki te ReoTuri. Report of the New Zealand Sign Language Inquiry. Retrieved from https://​www​.hrc​.co​.nz​/files​/8014​/2356​/7275​/A​-New​-Era​-in​-the​-Right​-to​-Sign​-for​-web​.pdf
Humphries, T.
(1977) Communicating across Cultures (Deaf-Hearing) and Language Learning (Doctoral dissertation, Union Institute and University, Cincinnati, OH). Retrieved from http://​libguides​.gallaudet​.edu​/content​.php​?pid​=114455​&sid​=989379
Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. R.
(2012) Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduction Journal, 9(1), 16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Language Choices for Deaf Infants: Advice for Parents Regarding Sign Languages. Clinical Pediatrics, 55(6), 513–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Institute for Language and Folklore
(2016) About the Institute for Language and Folklore. Retrieved from http://​www​.sprakochfolkminnen​.se​/om​-oss​/verksamhet​/about​-the​-institute​.html.
Johnston, T.
(2006) W(h)ither the Deaf Community? Population, Genetics, and the Future of Australian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 6(2), 137–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jousma, C.
(2009) Van warme woorden en “gave” gebaren [Of warm words and “whole” signs]. Leeuwarden/Ljouwert: in opdracht van het Fries Centrum voor Doven en Slechthorenden.Google Scholar
Kisch, S.
(2008) Deaf discourse: The social construction of deafness in a Bedowin Community in the Negev. Medical Antropology, 27(3), 283–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knoors, H., & Marschark, M.
(2012) Language Planning for the 21st Century: Revisiting Bilingual Language Policy for Deaf Children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(3), 291–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krausneker, V.
(2000) Sign Languages and the Minority Language Policy of the European Union. In M. Metzger (Ed.), Bilingualism & Identity in Deaf Communities (pp. 142–158). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Has something changed? Sign Languages in Europe: the case of minorised minority languages. Deaf Worlds, 19(2), 33–46.Google Scholar
(2015) Ideologies and Attitudes towards Sign Languages: An Approximation. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 411–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Moreland, C. J., Napoli, D. J., Osterling, W., Padden, C., & Rathmann, C.
(2010) Infants and Children with Hearing Loss Need Early Language Access. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 21(2), 143–154.Google Scholar
Kusters, A.
(2015) Deaf Space in Adamorobe: An ethnographic study in a village in Ghana. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, P.
(2003) Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Language Council of Norway
McKee, R.
(2008) The construction of deaf children as marginal bilinguals in the mainstream. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(5), 579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Action Pending: Four Years on from the New Zealand Sign Language Act. VUW Law Review, 42(2), 277–298.Google Scholar
(2017) Assessing the vitality of New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 17(3), 322–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKee, R., & Manning, V.
(2015) Evaluating Effects of Language Recognition on Language Rights and the Vitality of New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 473–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
May, S.
(2003) Rearticulating the Case for Minority Language Rights. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4(2), 95–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Language and minority rights. Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language (2nd ed.). NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A.
(2004) Chasing the Mythical Ten Percent: Parental Hearing Status of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4(2), 138–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. E., Young, T. A., Bachleda, B., & Karchmer, M. A.
(2006) How Many People Use ASL in the United States? Why Estimates Need Updating. Sign Language Studies, 6(3), 306–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. J.
(2007) “One touch of nature makes the whole world kin”: the transnational lives of Deaf Americans, 1870–1924 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://​ir​.uiowa​.edu​/cgi​/viewcontent​.cgi​?article​=1317​&context​=etd
(2015) Linguistic Human Rights Discourse in Deaf Community Activism. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 379–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niemela, J.
(2011) Danish Sign Language as an endangered language? Presented at the WFD-EUD conference “Sign Languages as Endangered Languages,” Ål, Norway, 7 November 2011.
Nonaka, A. M.
(2014) (Almost) everyone here Spoke Ban Khor Sign Language – until they started using TSL: Language shift and endangerment in a Thai village sign language. Language and Communication, 38, 54–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nover, S.
(2000) History of Language Planning in Deaf Education: the 19th Century (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://​arizona​.openrepository​.com​/arizona​/handle​/10150​/284155
O’Rourke, B., Pujolar, J., & Famallo, F.
(2015) New speakers of minority languages: The challenging opportunity – Foreward. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 231, 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padden, C. & Humphries, T.
(1988) Deaf in America. Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Punch, R., & Hyde, M. B.
(2011) Communication, Psychosocial, and Educational Outcomes of Children with Cochlear Implants and Challenges Remaining for Professionals and Parents. International Journal of Otolaryngology, 4, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quer, J.
(2012) Legal pathways to the recognition of sign languages: A comparison of the Catolan and Spanish Sign language acts. Sign Language Studies, 12(4), 565–582.Google Scholar
Reagan, T.
(2010) Language Policy and Planning for Sign Languages (Vol. 16). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Ideological Barriers to American Sign Language: Unpacking Linguistic Resistance. Sign Language Studies, 11(4), 606–636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S.
(2006) Planning for the survival of linguistic diversity. Language Policy, 5(4), 441–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Marín, R.
(2003) Language Rights: Exploring the Competing Rationales. In W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language Rights and Political Theory (pp. 52–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz, R.
(1984) Orientations in language planning. NABE: The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education, 8(2), 15–34.Google Scholar
Sarivaara, E., Uusiautti, S., & Määttä, K.
(2013) How to Revitalize an Indigenous Language? Adults’ Experiences of the Revitalization of the Sámi Language. Cross-Cultural Communication, 9(1), 13–21.Google Scholar
Schermer, T.
(2012) Sign Language Planning in the Netherlands between 1980 and 2010. Sign Language Studies, 12(4), 467–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Government
Skutnabb-Kangas, T.
(2010) Language rights. In J. Jaspers, J-O Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatic highlights. Society and Language Use (Vol. 7, pp. 212–232). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Aikio-Puoskari, U.
(2003) Exclusion or inclusion – linguistic human rights for a linguistic minority, the Deaf Sign language users, and an indigenous people, the Saami. In P. Lee (Ed.), Many voices, one vision: The Right to Communicate in Practice (pp. 59–88). London: Southbound.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B.
(2003) Reassessing Mãori regeneration. Language in Society, 32(4), 553–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, W.
(1960) Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf. In Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers (No. 8). Buffalo: Dept. of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Suomen viittomakielten kielipoliittinen ohjelma
(2010) [The Language Policy Programme for the National Sign Languages in Finland] Helsinki: Kuurojen Liitto ry & Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus. Retrieved from http://​www​.kotus​.fi​/index​.phtml​?s​=3834
Tallroth, P.
(2012) Multilingualism in Finland: A Legal Perspective. Language & Law, 1. Advance online publication. https://​www​.languageandlaw​.de​/volume​-1​/3339.
Tervoort, B.
(1953) Structurele analyse van visueel taalgebruik binnen een groep dove kinderen [Structural analysis of visual language use within a group of deaf children]. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J.
(2001) Language policy/planning and disadvantages. In R. Kaplan (Ed.) Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 415–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, G. H.
(2003a) On policies and prospects for British Sign Language. In G. Hogan-Brun & S. Wolff (Eds.), Minority Languages in Europe: frameworks, status, prospects (pp. 173–191). Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003b) Government recognition and £1 million boost for British Sign Language. Deaf Worlds, 19(1), 74–78.Google Scholar
UNESCO
(2013) UNESCO Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Van Herreweghe, M., De Meulder, M., & Vermeerbergen, M.
(2015) From Erasure to Recognition (and Back Again?): The Case of Flemish Sign Language. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Language Research, Policy and Practice (pp. 45–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Spotti, M., Juffermans, K., Cornips, L., Kroon, S., & Blommaert, J.
(2014) Globalization in the margins: toward a re-evalution of language and mobility. Applied Linguistics Review, 5(1), 23–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, M. & Pabsch, A.
(2010) Sign Language Legislation in the European Union. Brussels: European Union of the Deaf.Google Scholar
(2012) Sign Language Legislation in the European Union (2nd ed.). Brussels: European Union of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A., Archbold, S. M., Hardie, T., & Watson, L. M.
(2009) Children with cochlear implants: The communication journey. Cochlear Implants International, 10(1), 41–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U. & De Vos, C.
(2012) Sign Languages in Village Communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. Sign Language Typology Series No. 4. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

De Meulder, Maartje & Hilde Haualand
2019. Sign language interpreting services. Translation and Interpreting Studies Crossref logo
De Meulder, Maartje, Verena Krausneker, Graham Turner & John Bosco Conama
2019.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Minority Languages and Communities,  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
De Meulder, Maartje, Annelies Kusters, Erin Moriarty & Joseph J. Murray
2019. Describe, don't prescribe. The practice and politics of translanguaging in the context of deaf signers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40:10  pp. 892 ff. Crossref logo
Haualand, Hilde & Ingela Holmström
2019. When language recognition and language shaming go hand in hand – sign language ideologies in Sweden and Norway. Deafness & Education International 21:2-3  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Leeson, Lorraine
2019. Ophelia, Emma, and the beast from the east effortful engaging and the provision of sign language interpreting in emergencies. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 29:2  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo
Meulder, Maartje De
2019. “So, why do you sign?” Deaf and hearing new signers, their motivation, and revitalisation policies for sign languages. Applied Linguistics Review 10:4  pp. 705 ff. Crossref logo
Moriarty, Erin
2020. “Sign to me, not the children”: Ideologies of language contamination at a deaf tourist site in Bali. Language & Communication 74  pp. 195 ff. Crossref logo
Snoddon, Kristin & Maartje De Meulder
2020. Introduction: Ideologies in sign language vitality and revitalization. Language & Communication 74  pp. 154 ff. Crossref logo
Snoddon, Kristin & Erin Wilkinson
2019. Problematizing the Legal Recognition of Sign Languages in Canada. The Canadian Modern Language Review 75:2  pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Young, Alys, Jemina Napier & Rosemary Oram
2019. The translated deaf self, ontological (in)security and deaf culture. The Translator 25:4  pp. 349 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.