Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 41:2 (2017) ► pp. 136158


Adam, R.
(2015) Standardization of Sign Languages. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 432–445. Crossref link
Baldauf, R., & Kaplan, R.
(2003) Who are the actors? The role of (applied) linguists in language policy. In P. Ryan & R. Terborg (Eds.), Language: Issues of Inequality (pp. 19–40). Mexico City: CELE/ Autonomous National University of Mexico.
Batterbury, S., Ladd, P., & Gulliver, M.
(2007) Sign Language Peoples as indigenous minorities: implications for research and policy. Environment and Planning, 39, 2899–2915. Crossref link
Bickford, J. A., Lewis, M. P., & Simons, G. F.
(2014) Rating the vitality of sign languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(5), 513–527. Crossref link
Bryan, A., & Emery, S.
(2014) The Case for Deaf Legal Theory Through the Lens of Deaf Gain. In H. -D. L. Bauman & J. J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity (pp. 37–62). University of Minnesota Press.
Committee on the Icelandic Sign Language
(2015) Report of the Committee on Icelandic Sign Language. 7 June 2015. Retrieved from http://​www​.arnastofnun​.is​/solofile​/1017031
Conama, J. B.
(2013) Situating the socio-economic position of the Irish Deaf community in the equality framework. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: an International Journal, 32(2), 173–194. Crossref link
Deaf Sector Partnership
(2015) Scottish Government announces plans to recruit Deaf BSL users to the British Sign Language (BSL) National Advisory Group (NAG) [Press release]. Retrieved from https://​www​.bda​.org​.uk​/news​/bsl​-nag
de Bres, J.
(2015) The hierarchy of minority languages in New Zealand. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(7), 677–693. Crossref link
De Meulder, M.
(2012) Het decreet houdende de erkenning van de Vlaamse Gebarentaal: een evaluatie [The decree on the recognition of the Flemish Sign Language: an evaluation]. In G. De Clerck & R. Pinxten (Eds.), Gebarentaal zegt alles (pp. 56–70). Leuven: Acco.
(2016) Promotion in Times of Endangerment: the Sign Language Act in Finland. Language Policy, 16(2), 189–208. Crossref link
(2015a): Sign language recognition: tensions between specificity and universalism in international deaf discourses. In A. Kusters & M. Friedner (Eds.), It’s Small World. Inquiries into International Deaf Spaces (pp. 160–172). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
(2015b) The Legal Recognition of Sign Languages. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 498–506. Crossref link
(2015c) A Barking Dog That Never Bites?: The British Sign Language (Scotland) Bill. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 446–472. Crossref link
(2017) The influence of deaf people’s dual category status on sign language: The British Sign Langauage (Scotland) Act (2015). Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(2), 215–232. Crossref link
Dunbar, R.
(2006) Is There a Duty to Legislate for Linguistic Minorities? Journal of Law and Society, 33(1), 181–198. Crossref link
Eichmann, H.
(2009) Planning sign languages: promoting hearing hegemony? Conceptualizing sign language standardization. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10(3), 293–307. Crossref link
Emery, S.
(2011) Citizenship and the Deaf Community. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
Erlenkamp, S., Gjøen, S., Haualand, H., Kvitvær, H. B., Peterson, P. R., Schrøder, O., & Vonen, A. M.
(2007) Begrunnelser for å gjøre norsk tegnspråk til offisielt språk [Reasons for making Norwegian Sign Language an official language]. Norges Døveforbund.
European Union of the Deaf
(2011) Sign Languages’ status under threat in Denmark and the Netherlands? [Press release]. Retrieved from http://​www​.eud​.eu​/news​/wfd​-eud​-press​-release/
Fishman, J.
(1991) Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Geraci, C.
(2012) Language Policy and Planning: The Case of Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 12(4), 494–518. Crossref link
Goldberg, D., Looney, D., & Lusin, N.
(2015) Enrollment in Languages Other Than English in United States Institutions of Higher Education Fall 2013. Retrieved from Modern Language Association website: https://​apps​.mla​.org​/pdf​/2013​_enrollment​_survey​.pdf
Hauser, P., & Kartheiser, G.
(2014) The Advantages of Learning a Sign Language. In H. -D. L. Bauman & J. J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity (pp. 133–145). University of Minnesota Press.
Hoyer, K.
(2004) The Sociolinguistic Situation of Finland-Swedish Deaf People and Their Language, Finland-Swedish Sign Language. In M. Van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities (Vol. 10, pp. 3–23). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
Human Rights Commission
(2013) A New Era in the Right to Sign: He Houhanga Rongo te Tika ki te ReoTuri. Report of the New Zealand Sign Language Inquiry. Retrieved from https://​www​.hrc​.co​.nz​/files​/8014​/2356​/7275​/A​-New​-Era​-in​-the​-Right​-to​-Sign​-for​-web​.pdf
Humphries, T.
(1977) Communicating across Cultures (Deaf-Hearing) and Language Learning (Doctoral dissertation, Union Institute and University, Cincinnati, OH). Retrieved from http://​libguides​.gallaudet​.edu​/content​.php​?pid​=114455​&sid​=989379
Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. R.
(2012) Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduction Journal, 9(1), 16. Crossref link
(2015) Language Choices for Deaf Infants: Advice for Parents Regarding Sign Languages. Clinical Pediatrics, 55(6), 513–517. Crossref link
Institute for Language and Folklore
(2016) About the Institute for Language and Folklore. Retrieved from http://​www​.sprakochfolkminnen​.se​/om​-oss​/verksamhet​/about​-the​-institute​.html.
Johnston, T.
(2006) W(h)ither the Deaf Community? Population, Genetics, and the Future of Australian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 6(2), 137–173. Crossref link
Jousma, C.
(2009) Van warme woorden en “gave” gebaren [Of warm words and “whole” signs]. Leeuwarden/Ljouwert: in opdracht van het Fries Centrum voor Doven en Slechthorenden.
Kisch, S.
(2008) Deaf discourse: The social construction of deafness in a Bedowin Community in the Negev. Medical Antropology, 27(3), 283–313. Crossref link
Knoors, H., & Marschark, M.
(2012) Language Planning for the 21st Century: Revisiting Bilingual Language Policy for Deaf Children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(3), 291–305. Crossref link
Krausneker, V.
(2000) Sign Languages and the Minority Language Policy of the European Union. In M. Metzger (Ed.), Bilingualism & Identity in Deaf Communities (pp. 142–158). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
(2003) Has something changed? Sign Languages in Europe: the case of minorised minority languages. Deaf Worlds, 19(2), 33–46.
(2015) Ideologies and Attitudes towards Sign Languages: An Approximation. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 411–431. Crossref link
Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Moreland, C. J., Napoli, D. J., Osterling, W., Padden, C., & Rathmann, C.
(2010) Infants and Children with Hearing Loss Need Early Language Access. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 21(2), 143–154.
Kusters, A.
(2015) Deaf Space in Adamorobe: An ethnographic study in a village in Ghana. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
Ladd, P.
(2003) Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Language Council of Norway
McKee, R.
(2008) The construction of deaf children as marginal bilinguals in the mainstream. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(5), 579. Crossref link
(2011) Action Pending: Four Years on from the New Zealand Sign Language Act. VUW Law Review, 42(2), 277–298.
(2017) Assessing the vitality of New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 17(3), 322–362. Crossref link
McKee, R., & Manning, V.
(2015) Evaluating Effects of Language Recognition on Language Rights and the Vitality of New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 473–497. Crossref link
May, S.
(2003) Rearticulating the Case for Minority Language Rights. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4(2), 95–125. Crossref link
(2012) Language and minority rights. Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language (2nd ed.). NY and London: Routledge.
Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A.
(2004) Chasing the Mythical Ten Percent: Parental Hearing Status of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4(2), 138–163. Crossref link
Mitchell, R. E., Young, T. A., Bachleda, B., & Karchmer, M. A.
(2006) How Many People Use ASL in the United States? Why Estimates Need Updating. Sign Language Studies, 6(3), 306–335. Crossref link
Murray, J. J.
(2007) “One touch of nature makes the whole world kin”: the transnational lives of Deaf Americans, 1870–1924 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://​ir​.uiowa​.edu​/cgi​/viewcontent​.cgi​?article​=1317​&context​=etd
(2015) Linguistic Human Rights Discourse in Deaf Community Activism. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 379–410. Crossref link
Niemela, J.
(2011) Danish Sign Language as an endangered language? Presented at the WFD-EUD conference “Sign Languages as Endangered Languages,” Ål, Norway, 7 November 2011.
Nonaka, A. M.
(2014) (Almost) everyone here Spoke Ban Khor Sign Language – until they started using TSL: Language shift and endangerment in a Thai village sign language. Language and Communication, 38, 54–72. Crossref link
Nover, S.
(2000) History of Language Planning in Deaf Education: the 19th Century (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://​arizona​.openrepository​.com​/arizona​/handle​/10150​/284155
O’Rourke, B., Pujolar, J., & Famallo, F.
(2015) New speakers of minority languages: The challenging opportunity – Foreward. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 231, 1–20. Crossref link
Padden, C. & Humphries, T.
(1988) Deaf in America. Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Punch, R., & Hyde, M. B.
(2011) Communication, Psychosocial, and Educational Outcomes of Children with Cochlear Implants and Challenges Remaining for Professionals and Parents. International Journal of Otolaryngology, 4, 1–10. Crossref link
Quer, J.
(2012) Legal pathways to the recognition of sign languages: A comparison of the Catolan and Spanish Sign language acts. Sign Language Studies, 12(4), 565–582.
Reagan, T.
(2010) Language Policy and Planning for Sign Languages (Vol. 16). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
(2011) Ideological Barriers to American Sign Language: Unpacking Linguistic Resistance. Sign Language Studies, 11(4), 606–636. Crossref link
Romaine, S.
(2006) Planning for the survival of linguistic diversity. Language Policy, 5(4), 441–473. Crossref link
Rubio-Marín, R.
(2003) Language Rights: Exploring the Competing Rationales. In W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language Rights and Political Theory (pp. 52–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruiz, R.
(1984) Orientations in language planning. NABE: The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education, 8(2), 15–34.
Sarivaara, E., Uusiautti, S., & Määttä, K.
(2013) How to Revitalize an Indigenous Language? Adults’ Experiences of the Revitalization of the Sámi Language. Cross-Cultural Communication, 9(1), 13–21.
Schermer, T.
(2012) Sign Language Planning in the Netherlands between 1980 and 2010. Sign Language Studies, 12(4), 467–493. Crossref link
Scottish Government
Skutnabb-Kangas, T.
(2010) Language rights. In J. Jaspers, J-O Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatic highlights. Society and Language Use (Vol. 7, pp. 212–232). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Aikio-Puoskari, U.
(2003) Exclusion or inclusion – linguistic human rights for a linguistic minority, the Deaf Sign language users, and an indigenous people, the Saami. In P. Lee (Ed.), Many voices, one vision: The Right to Communicate in Practice (pp. 59–88). London: Southbound.
Spolsky, B.
(2003) Reassessing Mãori regeneration. Language in Society, 32(4), 553–578. Crossref link
Stokoe, W.
(1960) Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf. In Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers (No. 8). Buffalo: Dept. of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo.
Suomen viittomakielten kielipoliittinen ohjelma
(2010) [The Language Policy Programme for the National Sign Languages in Finland] Helsinki: Kuurojen Liitto ry & Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus. Retrieved from http://​www​.kotus​.fi​/index​.phtml​?s​=3834
Tallroth, P.
(2012) Multilingualism in Finland: A Legal Perspective. Language & Law, 1. Advance online publication. https://​www​.languageandlaw​.de​/volume​-1​/3339.
Tervoort, B.
(1953) Structurele analyse van visueel taalgebruik binnen een groep dove kinderen [Structural analysis of visual language use within a group of deaf children]. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeverij.
Tollefson, J.
(2001) Language policy/planning and disadvantages. In R. Kaplan (Ed.) Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 415–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turner, G. H.
(2003a) On policies and prospects for British Sign Language. In G. Hogan-Brun & S. Wolff (Eds.), Minority Languages in Europe: frameworks, status, prospects (pp. 173–191). Palgrave Macmillan. Crossref link
(2003b) Government recognition and £1 million boost for British Sign Language. Deaf Worlds, 19(1), 74–78.
(2013) UNESCO Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger. Paris: UNESCO.
Van Herreweghe, M., De Meulder, M., & Vermeerbergen, M.
(2015) From Erasure to Recognition (and Back Again?): The Case of Flemish Sign Language. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Language Research, Policy and Practice (pp. 45–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, X., Spotti, M., Juffermans, K., Cornips, L., Kroon, S., & Blommaert, J.
(2014) Globalization in the margins: toward a re-evalution of language and mobility. Applied Linguistics Review, 5(1), 23–44. Crossref link
Wheatley, M. & Pabsch, A.
(2010) Sign Language Legislation in the European Union. Brussels: European Union of the Deaf.
(2012) Sign Language Legislation in the European Union (2nd ed.). Brussels: European Union of the Deaf.
Wheeler, A., Archbold, S. M., Hardie, T., & Watson, L. M.
(2009) Children with cochlear implants: The communication journey. Cochlear Implants International, 10(1), 41–62. Crossref link
Zeshan, U. & De Vos, C.
(2012) Sign Languages in Village Communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. Sign Language Typology Series No. 4. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

De Meulder, Maartje & Hilde Haualand
2019. Sign language interpreting services. Translation and Interpreting Studies Crossref logo
De Meulder, Maartje, Verena Krausneker, Graham Turner & John Bosco Conama
2019.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Minority Languages and Communities,  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
De Meulder, Maartje, Annelies Kusters, Erin Moriarty & Joseph J. Murray
2019. Describe, don't prescribe. The practice and politics of translanguaging in the context of deaf signers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40:10  pp. 892 ff. Crossref logo
Haualand, Hilde & Ingela Holmström
2019. When language recognition and language shaming go hand in hand – sign language ideologies in Sweden and Norway. Deafness & Education International 21:2-3  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Leeson, Lorraine
2019. Ophelia, Emma, and the beast from the east effortful engaging and the provision of sign language interpreting in emergencies. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 29:2  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo
Meulder, Maartje De
2019. “So, why do you sign?” Deaf and hearing new signers, their motivation, and revitalisation policies for sign languages. Applied Linguistics Review 10:4  pp. 705 ff. Crossref logo
Snoddon, Kristin & Erin Wilkinson
2019. Problematizing the Legal Recognition of Sign Languages in Canada. The Canadian Modern Language Review 75:2  pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Young, Alys, Jemina Napier & Rosemary Oram
2020. The translated deaf self, ontological (in)security and deaf culture. The Translator  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.