Cover not available
Part of
Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education: Research Methods and Perspectives from Applied Linguistics
Edited by Mary Jane Curry and David I. Hanauer
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 1] 2014
► pp. 1–8

Chapter 1. Integrating applied linguistics and literacies with STEM education

Studies, aims, theories, methods, and forms

| Indiana University of Pennsylvania
| University of Rochester
This chapter describes the impetus for this collection of papers and provides an overview of the ways in which applied linguistics and literacies can be integrated with the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). We first explore the value of applied linguistics and literacies approaches to researching STEM education. Through a review of the studies included in this book, we present their underpinning theoretical orientations, research methodologies, communicative forms, and aims. We propose a facilitative role for applied linguistics in terms of the broad educational agenda of STEM.
Published online: 12 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.1.01han
References
Bazerman, C.
(1988) Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gee, J.P.
(2012) Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D., Frederick, J., Fotinakes, B., & Strobel, S.
(2012) Linguistic analysis of project ownership for undergraduate research experiences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 378–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2004) Disciplinary differences: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K.
(1981) The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.
(2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.
(1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A.
(2001) Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Poe, M., Lerner, N., & Craig, J.
(2010) Learning to communicate in science and engineering. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, N.
(2003) Science education researchers as orthographers: Documenting Keiyo (Kenya) knowledge, learning and narratives about snakes. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 89–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yore, L., Bisanz, G.L., & Hand, M.
(2003) Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Pisano, Alycia, Amanda Crawford, Heather Huffman, Barbara Graham & Nicole Kelp
2021. Development and Validation of a Universal Science Writing Rubric That is Applicable to Diverse Genres of Science Writing. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 22:3 DOI logo
Sharma, Bal Krishna & Suresh Canagarajah
2023. Spatial repertoires in the disciplinary communication of international STEM scholars. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:6 ► pp. 665 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.