Chapter 5. Writing as social practice in engineering
Views from a cross-disciplinary study
This chapter reports on a collaborative study that used a range of qualitative data (interviews, observations, talk around text, and written reports) as its empirical base to examine academic and professional writing in four schools of the faculty of engineering at a British university. Findings demonstrate that writing in these schools is closely related to its context of production. As such, writing not only reflects the views on knowledge and ideologies of engineering as a discipline but also helps to reaffirm them. The findings contribute to understandings of the nature and dynamics of writing as social practice that emerged from the research efforts of a cross-disciplinary team of researchers in applied linguistics and engineering. They show that both applied linguists and engineers can inform pedagogical approaches to disciplinary writing practices so that they can become more context- and discipline-specific. The chapter concludes by suggesting avenues for further cross-disciplinary research in writing.
References (41)
Alley, M
(
2000)
The craft of editing: A guide for managers, scientists and engineers. New York, NY: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R
(
2000)
Situated literacies. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bazerman, C. & Prior, P
(
2003)
What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bracewell, R.J. & Witte, S.P
(
2003)
Tasks, ensembles, and activity: Linkages between text production and situation of use in the workplace.
Written Communication, 20(4), 511–559.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brieger, N
(
2011)
Collins English for business: Writing. London: Harper Collins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charmaz, K
(
2005)
Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In
N.K. Denzin, &
Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.),
The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charmaz, K
(
2011)
A constructivist grounded theory analysis of losing and regaining a valued self. In
F. J. Wertz,
K. Charmaz,
L.M. McMullen,
R. Josselson,
R. Anderson, &
E. McSpadden (Eds.),
Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry (pp. 165–204). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christie, M., Ferdos, F. & Adawi, T
(
2009)
Cross disciplinary research in engineering and educational sciences: A Swedish case study. Proceedings of the 37th SEFI Annual Conference, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Available at
[URL] (12 March 2013).
Cross, N
(
1997)
Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example.
Design Studies, 18(4), 427–440.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curry, M.J
(
2012)
Transcending ‘traditional academic boundaries’: Designing and implementing a science communication course for science and engineering Ph.D. students.
Professional and Academic Writing, 40, 4–7.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curry, M.J
(
2014)
Graphics as invention heuristics in writing for publication by academic engineers. In
M. J. Curry &
D. Hanauer, (Eds.),
Language, literacy, and learning in STEM Education: Research methods and perspectives from applied linguistics (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Engineers’ Council for Professional Development
(
1947)
Canons of ethics for engineers. New York: Engineers’ Council for Professional Development.’.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Figueiredo, A.D
(
2008)
Toward an epistemology of engineering. Proceedings of the Workshop on Philosophy & Engineering (pp. 94–96). London: Royal Engineering Academy.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, I.S
(
1998)
Assessment criteria for undergraduate project work in engineering design.
European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(3), 389–395.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gimenez, J
(
2008)
Beyond the academic essay: Discipline-specific writing in nursing and midwifery.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3), 151–164.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gimenez, J
(
2012)
Disciplinary epistemologies, generic attributes and undergraduate academic writing in nursing and midwifery.
Higher Education, 63(4), 401–419.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gimenez, J. & Thondhlana, J
(
2012)
Collaborative writing in engineering: Perspectives from research and implications for undergraduate education.
European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 471–487.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gygi, K. & Zachry, M
(
2010)
Productive tensions and the regulatory work of genres in the development of an engineering communication workshop in a transnational corporation.
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(3), 358–381.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Henry, J
(
1886)
Scientific writings of Joseph Henry. Washington, DC: The Smithsonian Institution.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Isherwood, B.F
(
1863)
Experimental researches in steam engineering. Philadelphia, PA: W. Hamilton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, A
(
2009)
Redisciplining generic attributes: The disciplinary context in focus.
Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 85–100.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, H.C. & Severison Eklundh, K
(
2001)
Reviewing practices in collaborative writing.
Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10(2), 247–259.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S
(
1986)
Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lillis, T
(
2008)
Ethnography as method, methodology, and ‘deep theorizing’. Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research.
Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luzon, M.J
(
2005)
Genre analysis in technical communication.
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(3), 285–295.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nelson, S
(
2000)
Teaching collaborative writing and peer review techniques to engineering and technology undergraduates. Proceedings of the 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, S2B-1–5.
McClellan, W
(
1913)
A suggestion for the engineering profession.
Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 32(2), 1271–72.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parks, S
(
2001)
Moving from school to the workplace: Disciplinary innovation, border crossing, and the reshaping of a written genre.
Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 405–438.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seifert, C
(
2009)
Writing for business: A graduate level course in problem-solving.
Business Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 200–213.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sherwin, J
(
2010)
An approach towards holism in science and engineering.
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 19(3), 285–305.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Storch, N. & Tapper, J
(
2009)
The impact of an EAP course on postgraduate writing.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 207–223.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strauss, A.L
(
1987)
Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Street, B.V
(
2001)
Literacy and development: Ethnographic perspectives. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tenopir, C., & King, D.K
(
2004)
Communication patterns of engineers. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Emden, J
(
2005)
Writing for engineers. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, X
(
2008)
Software engineering foundations. New York, NY: Auerbach Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wheeler, E. & McDonald, R
(
2000)
Writing in engineering courses.
Journal of Engineering Education, 89(4), 481–486.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winsor, D
(
1996)
Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winsor, D
(
2001)
Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition.
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(1), 5–28.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhu, W
(
2004)
Writing in business courses: An analysis of assignment types, their characteristics, and required skills.
English for Specific Purposes, 23(2), 111–135.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
le Roux, Kate, Malebogo Ngoepe, Corrinne Shaw & Brandon Ian Collier-Reed
2022.
Language and disciplinary literacies for accessing, learning and communicating meaning: students’ experiences of the transition from school to first-year undergraduate engineering.
European Journal of Engineering Education 47:6
► pp. 1144 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Barr, Nancy
2019.
2019 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm),
► pp. 121 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Freddi, Alessandro & Mario Salmon
2019.
Engineering Design and Industrial Design. In
Design Principles and Methodologies [
Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering, ],
► pp. 3 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.