Article published in:
Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education: Research Methods and Perspectives from Applied Linguistics
Edited by Mary Jane Curry and David I. Hanauer
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 1] 2014
► pp. 87–106

Chapter 6. Graphics and invention in academic engineers’ writing for publication

| University of Rochester
This chapter explores how academic engineers write for publication, focusing on “invention” – that is, moments when writers identify the research results they want to present and decide on the arguments they want to make in an article. A key finding presented is that beyond the well-documented role of graphics in displaying research results, graphics also play a crucial heuristic role in invention. This finding emerged from an ethnographic study of three engineering research groups, which entailed the analysis of a range of qualitative data to offer perspectives on the experiences of academic engineers writing for publication. Drawing on this research, the chapter documents that in developing texts for publication, engineers often begin with the graphic results of data analysis to identify findings and begin to craft arguments. Further, in research group and informal meetings, engineers invoke the notion of storytelling through graphics as they socialize their group members into the practices of research dissemination via posters and articles.
Published online: 12 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.1.06cur
References

References

Alford, E. & Stubblefield, P.
(2002). Mentoring engineering graduate students in professional communications: An interdisciplinary workshop approach. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Quebec, 11835–11849.
Amare, N., & Manning, A.
(2007) The language of visuals: Text + graphics = Visual rhetoric tutorial. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50(1), 57–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archer, A.H.
(2006) A multimodal approach to academic ‘literacies’: Problematizing the visual/verbal divide. Language and Education, 20(6), 449–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M.
(1986) The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (trans. V.W. McGee). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barton, D. & Tusting, K.
(2005) (Eds.) Beyond communities of practice: Language, power, and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bawarshi, A.
(2003) Genre and the invention of the writer: Reconsidering the place of invention in composition. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C.
(1980) A relationship between reading and writing: The conversational model. College English, 41, 656–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, K.
(2009) English academic style manuals: A survey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 43–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, J. & Kress, G.
(2008) Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakeslee, A.
(1997) Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11(2), 125–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K.
(2006) Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chiu, Y.-H.
(2011) Exploring non-native science scholars’ perspectives of writing for publication in English. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 469–476.Google Scholar
Curry, M.J.
(2003) Skills, access, and “basic writing”: A community college case study from the United States. Studies in the Education of Adults, 35(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
(2011) “Where there is no laundry”: Review of five books on writing for publication. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 1–4. Doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Graphics as invention heuristics in writing for publication by academic engineers. In M. J. Curry & D. Hanauer, (Eds.), Language, literacy, and learning in STEM Education: Research methods and perspectives from applied linguistics (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Curry, M.J. & Lillis, T.
(2010) Making academic publishing practices visible: Designing research-based heuristics to support English-medium text production. In N. Harwood (Ed.), Language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 322–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) A scholar’s guide to getting published in English: Critical choices and practical strategies. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dicks, B., Flewitt, R., Lancaster, L. & Pahl, K.
(2011) Multimodality and ethnography: Working at the intersection. Qualitative Research, 11, 227–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gimenez, J. & Thondhlana, J.
(2012) Collaborative writing in engineering: Perspectives from research and implications for undergraduate education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 471–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graves, H.
(2005) Rhetoric in (to) science: Style as invention in inquiry. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D.
(2006) Scientific discourse: Multimodality in the science classroom. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2009) Science and the linguistic landscape: A genre analysis of representational wall space in a microbiology laboratory. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 287–301). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harwood, N.
(2005) What do we want EAP teaching materials for? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 149–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawhee, D.
(2002) Kairotic encounters. In J. M. Atwill & J. M. Lauer (Eds.), Perspectives on rhetorical invention (pp. 16–35). Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Hutto, D.
(2007) Graphics and invention in engineering writing. Technical Communication, 54(1), 88–98.Google Scholar
Kamler, B. & Thomson, P.
(2008) The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 507–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K.
(1981) The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, D.
(2006) Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 19–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G.
(2011) ‘Partnerships in research’: Multimodality and ethnography. Qualitative Research, 11: 239–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaFevre, K.
(1987) Invention as a social act. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.
(1979) Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lauer, J.
(2004) Invention in rhetoric and composition. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Lea, M. & Street, B.V.
(2006) Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2): 157–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leydens, J. & Olds, B.
(2007) Publishing in scientific and engineering contexts: A course for graduate students. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50(1), 45–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y.Y.
(2002) Writing for international publication: The perceptions of Chinese doctoral researchers. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 179–193.Google Scholar
(2005) Multidimensional enculturation: The case of an EFL Chinese doctoral student. Journal of Asian Pacific Communications, 15(1), 153–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T.
(2001) Student writing: Access, regulation and desire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2003) An ‘academic literacies’ approach to student writing in higher education: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T.M. & Curry, M.J.
(2006) Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 23(1), 3–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lillis, T. & Scott, M.
(2007) Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P.
(2000) Storytelling and the development of discourse in the engineering design process. Design Studies, 21, 357–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luzon, M.J.
(2005) Genre analysis in technical communication. IEEE Explore, 285–295.Google Scholar
Mathison, M.
(2000) “I don’t have to argue my design – the visual speaks for itself”: A case study of mediated activity in an introductory mechanical engineering course. In S. Mitchell & R. Andrew (Eds.), Learning to argue in higher education (pp. 74–84). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
Nathan, M. & Petrosino, A.
(2003) Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 905–928. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odell, L. & Swersey, B.
(2003) Reinventing invention: Writing across the curriculum without WAC. Language & Learning across the Disciplines, 6(3): 38–53.Google Scholar
Poe, M., Lerner, N., & Craig, J.
(2010) Learning to communicate in science and engineering: Case studies from MIT. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rymer, J.
(1988) Scientific composing processes: How eminent scientists write journal articles. In D. A. Joliffe (Ed.), Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 211–250). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Selzer, J.
(1983) The composing processes of an engineer. College Composition and Communication, 34(2), 178–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, P.
(2010) Research reports in academic and industrial research. In M. F. Ruiz-Garrido, J.C. Palmer-Silveira & I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), English for professional and academic purposes (pp. 73–87). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Shehzad, W.
(2006) How to end an introduction in a computer science article: A corpus-based approach. In E. Fitzpatrick (Ed.) Language and computers, corpus linguistics beyond the word: Corpus linguistics from phrase to discourse (pp. 227–241). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E.
(1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, D.
(1992) What counts as writing? An argument from engineers’ practice. Journal of Advanced Composition, 12(2), 337–347.Google Scholar
(1994) Invention and writing in technical work: Representing the object. Written Communication, 11(2), 227–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Canagarajah, Suresh
2018. English as a spatial resource and the claimed competence of Chinese STEM professionals. World Englishes 37:1 ► pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Curry, Mary Jane
2014.  In Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education [Language Studies, Science and Engineering, 1], ► pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Gimenez, Julio
2014.  In Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education [Language Studies, Science and Engineering, 1], ► pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Goldsmith, Rosalie, Keith Willey & David Boud
2019. Investigating invisible writing practices in the engineering curriculum using practice architectures. European Journal of Engineering Education 44:1-2 ► pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Hanauer, David I.
2014.  In Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education [Language Studies, Science and Engineering, 1], ► pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Minakova, Valeriya & Suresh Canagarajah
2020. Monolingual ideologies versus spatial repertoires: language beliefs and writing practices of an international STEM scholar. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.