Chapter 8. Learning while teaching
How classroom discourse practices mediate mathematics teachers’ learning about student thinking
The literature in mathematics education has extensively documented the ways that discourse practices affect student learning and dispositions. However, there has been little discussion about how discourse practices affect what teachers learn in classrooms. This chapter builds from Davis’s (1997) description of listening practices to explore the related propositions that what teachers learn in the context of their teaching is tied to the ways they listen, and their opportunities for listening are tied to the language patterns they enact in their classrooms. I provide examples of classroom discussions to illustrate various types of listening/language patterns and their implications for teacher learning. The episodes of classroom discourse demonstrate a continuum of teachers’ listening practices and associated language patterns, from evaluative listening and teacher-centric language patterns to more interpretive listening and interactive discourse practices. In these episodes, evaluative listening involved less ambiguity than interpretive forms of listening, but revealed little about the deep ways students made sense of the mathematics. Interpretive and hermeneutic listening, by contrast, involved higher ambiguity but yielded deeper insights into student thinking than evaluative forms of listening. These findings highlight the importance of connecting teacher practices not only to student learning but also to what teachers know about how students learn mathematics. They also demonstrate the value of discourse analysis to understanding mathematics classroom practices of teaching and learning.
References
Ball, D.L
(
1993)
With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics.
The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397.


Cazden, C.B
(
2001)
Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Choppin, J
(
2011a)
The impact of professional noticing on teachers’ adaptations of challenging tasks.
Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(3), 175–197.


Choppin, J
(
2011b)
Learned adaptations: Teachers’ understanding and use of curriculum resources.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 331–353.


Choppin, J
(
2011c)
The role of local theories: Teacher knowledge and its impact on engaging students with challenging tasks.
Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(1), 5–25.


Cobb, P., Zhao, Q., & Dean, C
(
2009)
Conducting design experiments to support teachers’ learning: A reflection from the field.
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 165–199.


Cohen, D.K
(
2011)
Teaching and its predicaments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Davis, B
(
1997)
Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355–376.


Engle, R.A., & Conant, F. R
(
2002)
Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom.
Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.


Forman, E.A., McCormick, D.E., & Donato, R
(
1998)
Learning what counts as a mathematical explanation.
Linguistics and Education, 9(4), 313–339.


Franke, M., Carpenter, T., Levi, L., & Fennema, E
(
2001)
Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics.
American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689.


Franke, M., & Kazemi, E
(
2001)
Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In
T. Wood,
B.S. Nelson, &
J. Warfield (Eds.),
Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 47–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gee, J.P
(
1999)
An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.

Goos, M
(
2004)
Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258–291.


Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Choppin, J., Wagner, D., & Pimm, D
. (Eds.) (
2012)
Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices and policies. New York, NY: Springer.


Herbel-Eisenmann, B.A., & Breyfogle, M.L
(
2005)
Questioning our patterns of questioning.
Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(9), 484–489.

Lappan, G., Fey, J.T., Fitzgerald, W.M., Friel, S.N., & Phillips, E.D
(
2006)
Connected mathematics 2. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.

Latour, B
(
1988)
Drawing things together. In
M. Lynch &
S. Woolgar (Eds.),
Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Lemke, J.L
(
1990)
Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

Lerman, S
(
2001)
Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.


Ma, L
(
1999)
Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mehan, H
(
1979)
Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Michaels, S., O’Connor, M.C., & Resnick, L.B
(
2008)
Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life.
Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.


O’Connor, M. C, & Michaels, S
(
1993)
Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy.
Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–355.


Schultz, K
(
2003)
Listening: A framework for teaching across differences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Sfard, A
(
2007)
When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint.
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613.


Simon, M., & Tzur, R
(
1999)
Explicating the teachers’ perspective from the researchers’ perspectives: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers’ practice.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 252–264.


Stein, M.K., Engle, R.A., Smith, M.S., & Hughes, E.K
(
2008)
Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell.
Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313–340.


Truxaw, M.P., & DeFranco, T.C
(
2008)
Mapping mathematics classroom discourse and its implications for models of teaching.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(5), 489–525.

Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Falout, Joseph, Matthew Apple & Glen Hill
2022.
Setting the Stage of STEM English for Students. In
STEM English in Japan,
► pp. 3 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.