This chapter revisits the field of educational ergonomics in the light of the current state of learner-computer interactions (LCI) and within the specific context of language learning. The discussion starts by defining the elements that constitute ergonomics in computer assisted language learning (CALL) as a methodological and theoretical framework, reviewing key concepts and principal theories upon which CALL ergonomics is based. The discussion focuses on the motives behind this innovative approach before exploring specific examples of engineering methods that can be applied to CALL research. We argue that methods inherited from human-computer interaction (HCI) or human-centred design (HCD) offer an excellent complement to CALL research and that, vice-versa, CALL ergonomics constitutes a framework that is closely related to HCI research, in that the user plays a central role in influencing the interactions, providing rich data that can be recycled in many ways.
Bærentsen, K.B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance.
Proceedings of NordiCHI 2002
(pp.51–60). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15.
Benedyk, R., Woodcock, A., & Harder, A. (2009). The hexagon-spindle model for educational ergonomics. Work,32(3), 237–248.
Bertin, J.C., & Gravé, P. (2010). In favor of a model of didactic ergonomics. InJ.C. Bertin, P. Gravé, & J.-P. Narcy-Combes(Eds.), Second language distance learning and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and didactic ergonomics (pp. 1 –36). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Bevan, N. (1999). Quality in use: Meeting user needs for quality. Journal of Systems and Software, 49(1), 9–96.
Bevan, N. (2009). Extending quality in use to provide a framework for usability measurement. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human Centered Design (pp. 13–22). Proceedings of HCI International 2009, San Diego, California, USA. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Bijker, W. (1997). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Towards a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chalmers, P. (2003). The role of cognitive theory in human–computer interface. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19, 593–607.
Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colpaert, J. (2006). Toward an ontological approach in goal-oriented language courseware design and its implications for technology-independent content structuring. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2), 109–127.
Caws, C. (2013). Evaluating a web-based video corpus through an analysis of user interactions. ReCALL, 25(1), 85-104.
Caws, C., & Hamel, M.-J. (2013). From analysis to training: Recycling interaction data into learning processes. OLBI Working Papers, 5, 25-36.
Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’ experiences of e-learning in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Felix, U. (2005). E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: The need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches. ReCALL, 17(1), 85-100.
Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students’ behaviour in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 409–442.
Guichon, N. (2007). Recherche-développement et didactique des langues. Les Cahiers de l’ACEDLE, 4(1), 37–54.
Guth, S. (2009). Personal learning environments for language learning. InM. Thomas(Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 451–471). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Hamel, M.-J. (2012). Testing aspects of the usability of an online learner dictionary prototype: A product- and process-oriented study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 339-365.
Hamel, M.-J. (2013). Questionnaires to inform user tests in CALL. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 56–76.
Hamel, M.-J., & Caws, C. (2010). Usability tests in CALL development: Pilot studies in the context of the Dire autrement and FrancoToile projects. CALICO, 27(3), 491–504.
Handley, Z., & Hamel, M.-J. (2005). Establishing a methodology for benchmarking speech synthesis for computer assisted language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 9(3), 99–120. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Hauck, M. (2005). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive strategies, and CALL. In J. Egbert & G. Petrie (Eds.), Research perspectives on CALL (pp. 65–86). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Hémard, D. (2003). Language learning online: Designing towards user acceptability. In U. Felix(Ed.)Language learning online: Towards best practice (pp. 21–42). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hémard, D. (2006). Design issues related to the evaluation of learner-computer interaction in a web-based environment: Activities v. tasks. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2–3), 261–276.
Hornbæk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 9–102.
Huh, K., & Hu, W. (2005). Criteria for effective CALL research. InJ.L. Egbert & G.M. Petrie(Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 9–24). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
International Organization for Standardization. (n.d.). Standards. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Laville, A. (1976). L’ergonomie. Paris: PUF.
Leontiev, A.N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. InJ.V. Wertsch(Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Levy, M. (2013). Design-based research and the quest for normalization in CALL. In J. Rodriguez & C. Pardo-Ballester(Eds.), Design-based research in CALL (Vol. 11, pp.31–40). CALICO Monograph Series. San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Cambrige, MA: Academic Press.
Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris, France: A. Colin.
Raby, F., Baillé, F., & Bressoux, P., & Chapelle, C. (2003). Ergonomic theory and practice: What language learners do in a self-access room. Asp enligne, 41–42. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Raby, F. (2005). A user-centered ergonomic approach to CALL research. InJ.L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie(Eds.), CALL Research Perspectives (pp. 179–190). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sanders, M., & McCormick, E. (1987). Human factors in engineering and design. NewYork, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Scapin, D., & Bastien, J. (1997). Ergonomic criteria for evaluating ergonomic quality of interface systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 16, 220–231.
Selber, S. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Vérillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artefacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 7–101.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. 
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2022. Language instructors on their emergency remote teaching pedagogy during
the pandemic. In Intelligent CALL, granular systems and learner data: short papers from
EUROCALL 2022, ► pp. 135 ff.
Lightbourn, Ryleigh & Catherine Caws
2021. Une analyse sociocritique de l’usage de Twitter pour le développement de compétences socio-interactionnelles et numériques. Éducation et francophonie 49:2
Seffah, Ahmed, Mohammad Amin Kuhail & Joao Negreiros
2021. 2021 9th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET), ► pp. 215 ff.
Hamel, Marie-Josée
2019. Bilingues, francophiles et citoyens du web ! / Bilinguals, Francophiles and Web Citizens!. CALICO Journal 36:3 ► pp. 162 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.