Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 42:1 (2019) ► pp. 143147


Bauman, James J.
1974Pronominal verb morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 1.1: 108–55.Google Scholar
1975Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie J. A.
1957Colloquial Chin as a pronominalized language. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 20: 323–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Brian Houghton
1847On the Kocck, Bodo and Dhimál tribes. Calcutta: J. Thomas, Baptist Mission Press. (A slightly revised version also appears in Hodgson 1880, Volume I.)Google Scholar
[ p. 148 ]
1856Aborigines of the Nilgiris with remarks on their affinities. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 25: 498–522. (Reprinted in Hodgson 1980, Vol. II, 1, 125–144.)Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian H.
1857On the physical geography of the Himálaya. In Selections from the Records of The Government of Bengal, No. XXVII: Papers related to the colonization, commerce, physical geography, &c, &c of the Himalaya mountains and Nepal, by Brian Houghton Hodgson, 48–82. Calcutta: John Gray, “Calcutta Gazette” Office.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian Houghton
1880Miscellaneous essays relating to Indian subjects. Vol. I. & II, London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Konow, Sten
1904Tibeto-Burman family, Part III, Specimens of the Kuki-Chin and Burma Groups. Vol. III of G. A. Grierson (ed.), Linguistic survey of India, Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2018Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Critical concepts in linguistics, Volumes I-IV. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, Max
1854Letter to Chevalier Bunsen, on the classification of the Turanian languages. London. https://​archive​.org​/details​/cu31924087972182​/page​/n157