Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 47:1 (2024) ► pp.90–117

Revisiting “aberrant” features in Saek

Contact-induced changes and its position within Tai

 | Chulalongkorn University
This study challenges the notion of Saek as an aberrant member of Tai by proposing that certain features previously considered archaic are, in fact, contact-induced innovations. Specifically, it argues that multiple correspondences involving /j-/ and the alleged split of the Proto-Tai *A1 tone can be traced back to Vietnamese and Lao or Thai influence. Additionally, this paper asserts that Saek is closely related to Fusui, a Northern Tai dialect spoken in southwestern Guangxi. This paper concludes that Saek is a Tai language with some unique retentions and traces of contact with neighboring languages.
Keywords: Saek, Tai, Kra-Dai, sound change, contact-induced change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Multiple correspondences of Saek palatal glide
  • 4.Alleged split of *A1
  • 5.Position of Saek
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.00018.pit
References (58)
References
Alves, Mark J. 2007. A look at North-Central Vietnamese. In Ratree Wayland, John Hartmann & Paul Sidwell (eds.), Papers from the 12th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 1–7. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Boltz, William G. 1991. The Old Chinese terrestrial Rames in Saek. In William G. Boltz & Michael C. Shapiro (eds.), Studies in the historical phonology of Asian languages, 53–67. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burusphat, Somsonge. 2018. Regional variation and change of Tai Dam single initials. Dialectologia 211. 17–36.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, James R. 1975. A new look at the history and classification of the Tai languages. In Jimmy G. Harris & James R. Chamberlain (eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney, 49–66. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.Google Scholar
1991. Mène: A Tai dialect originally spoken in Nghê an (Nghê Tinh), Viêtnam: Preliminary linguistic observations and historical implications. Journal of the Siam Society 791. 103–123.Google Scholar
1998. The origin of the Sek: Implications for Tai and Vietnamese history. Journal of the Siam Society 861. 27–48.Google Scholar
2000. The origin of the Sek: Implications for Tai and Vietnamese history. In Somsongse Burusphat (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Tai Studies, 97–127. Bangkok: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Ferlus, Michel. 1992. Histoire abregée de des consonnes initiales du vietnamien. Mon-Khmer Studies 201. 111–127.Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony. 1995. Linguistic Reconstruction: An introduction to theory and method. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraisse, André. 1950. Les tribus Sek et Kha de la province de Cammon (Laos). Bulletin de la Société des Etudes Indochines 251. 333–348.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2015. Trees, waves, and linkages: Models of language diversification. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 161–89. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gedney, William J. 1970. The Saek language of Nakhon Phanom province. Journal of the Siam Societiy 581. 67–87.Google Scholar
1972a. A checklist for determining tones in Tai dialects. In M. Estellie Smith (ed.), Studies in Linguistics in Honor of George L. Trager, 423–437. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1972b. A puzzle in comparative Tai phonology. In Jimmy G. Harris & Richard B. Noss (eds.), Tai phonetics and phonology, 52–57. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.Google Scholar
1989a. Evidence for another series of voiced initials in Proto-Tai. In Robert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas J. Hudak & Patcharin Peyasantiwong (eds.), Selected Papers on Comparative Tai Studies, 229–270. Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
1989b. The Saek language of Nakhon Phanom province. In Robert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas J. Hudak & Patcharin Peyasantiwong (eds.), Selected Papers on Comparative Tai Studies, 373–400. Ann Arbor: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
1989c. Yay, a Northern Tai language in Vietnam. In Robert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas J. Hudak & Patcharin Peyasantiwong (eds.), Selected Papers on Comparative Tai Studies, 401–414. Ann Arbor: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
1993a. Saek final -l: archaism or innovation? In Thomas J. Hudak (ed.), William J. Saek Language: Glossaries, texts, and translations, 917–974. Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993b. The twelve year names in Saek. In Thomas J. Hudak (ed.), William J. Saek Language: Glossaries, texts, and translations, 975–989. Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guangxi Regional Language Commission Research Office. 1994. Zhuangyu fangyan tuyu yinxi [Sound systems of Zhuang vernaculars]. Nanning: Guangxi Minzu Chuban She.Google Scholar
Harrison, Shelly P. 2003. On the Limits of the Comparative Method. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 213–242. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1952. Les occlusives velaires en thai. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 481. 86–89.Google Scholar
. 1958. Les Sek de la province du Cammon (Laos), migration thai ou déportation chinoise?. Journal Asiatique 2461. 107–108.Google Scholar
. 1963a. La langue Sek. In Proceedings of the 25th Congress of Orientalists, 414–415. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1963b. Remarques sur les initiales complexes de la language Sek. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 581. 156–163.Google Scholar
. 1976. La tonologie du Sek. 711. 299–304.Google Scholar
Holm, David G. 2010. Linguistic diversity along the China-Vietnam border. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 33(2). 1–62.Google Scholar
2023. The Brigands’ Song among the Ngạn People in Northern Vietnam. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities 261. 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Jinhua, Nicom Charumanee & Ling Qingsong. 2015. Taiguo, Laowo de Shijia yu laiyuan tansuo [Exploring the origin of the Saek language of Thailand and Laos]. Xinan Minzu Daxue Xuebao (Renwen Shehui Ban) [Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Science)] 361. 56–59.Google Scholar
Hudak, Thomas J. 1993. William J. Gedney’s The Saek language: Glossaries, texts, and translations Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
2008. William J. Gedney’s Comparative Tai Source Book. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
2010. William J. Gedney’s Concise Saek-English, English-Saek Lexicon. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Inprasitha, Narumol. 1991. A study of the trend of sound change in Saek at Ban Atsamat, Nakhonphanom province. Salaya: Mahidol University PhD thesis.
Jitbanjong, Sarinya. 2008. A variation of lexicon usage in Saek language among three generations. Journal of Mekong Society 41. 61–80.Google Scholar
. 2010. A comparison study of Saek phonology and morphology in Lao and Thailand. Tha Pho: Naresuan University PhD thesis.
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1923. Analytic dictionary of Chinese and Sino-Japanese. Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Khanittanan, Wilaiwan. 1976. Phasa Saek [The Saek language]. Bangkok: Thammasat University.Google Scholar
. 2008. Saek revisited. In Anthony V. N. Diller, Jerold A. Edmonson & Yongxian Luo (eds.), The Tai-Kadai Languages, 389–392. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kosaka, Ryuichi. 1992. Tentative reconstruction d’un proto-“saek-chuang” et comparaison de son vocabulaire avec l’ancien siamois. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies MA thesis.
. 1997. On the loans of Vietnamese origin in the Saek language. In Arthur S. Abramson (ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics Studies in Honor of Vichin Panupong, 127–146. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
L-Thongkum, Theraphan. 1976. The Saek language of Ban Bawa: Some phonetic notes. In Mantaro J. Hashimota & James A. Mattisoff (eds.), Genetic Relationship, Diffusion and Typological Similarities of East and Southeast Asian Languages: Papers for the 1st Japan-US Joint Seminar on East & Southeast Asian Linguistics. Tokyo: Center for Asian and African Studies.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-kuei. 1945. Some Old Chinese loan words in the Tai languages. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 81. 333–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1954. Consonant clusters in Tai. Language 301. 368–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1957. The Jui dialect of Po-ai and the Northern Tai. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 291. 315–322.Google Scholar
. 1960. A tentative classification of Tai dialects. In Stanley Diamond (ed.), Culture in History: Essays in honor of Paul Radin, 951–959. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
. 1977. Handbook of comparative Tai. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Meng, Weijian. 2023. A grammar of Saek. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD thesis.
Morev, Lev N. 1988. Yazik sek [Saek language]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Ostapirat, Weera. 2007. Proto-Tai velars and postvelars. In Jimmy G. Harris, Somsongse Burusphat & James E. Harris (eds.), Studies in Tai and Southeast Asian linguistics, 293–300. Bangkok: Ekphimthai Ltd.Google Scholar
. 2009. Proto-Tai and Kra-Dai finals *-l and *-c. Journal of Language and Culture 281. 41–56.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Jueya, Cheng Fang & Yu Cuirong. 1984. Jingyu jianzhi [A sketch of Jing]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2009a. The phonology of Proto-Tai. Ithaca: Cornell University PhD thesis.
. 2009b. Proto-Southwestern Tai revised: A new reconstruction. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 21. 119–143.Google Scholar
. 2013. Tonal developments and Southwestern Tai subgrouping. Journal of Letters 421. 305–339.Google Scholar
Robequain, Charles. 1929. Le Thanh Hoá: Etude géographique province annamite Paris and Bruxelles: G. Van Oest.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Axel. 2009. Mininal Old Chinese and later Han Chinese: A companion to Grammatica serica recensa. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Tangsiriwattanakul, Shinnakrit. 2020. Ming Shilu as evidence of devoicing of voiced obstruents in Siamese. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 131. 67–95.Google Scholar
Zhang, Junru, Ouyang Jueya, Zheng Yiqing, Li Xulian & Xie Jianyou. 1999. Zhuangyu fangyan yanjiu [Zhuang dialect studies]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Press.Google Scholar